the lineup
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: the lineup
- Raider917
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,700
- And1: 770
- Joined: Apr 14, 2009
- Location: Nova Scotia
-
Re: the lineup
why didnt i start this thread sooner?
Re: the lineup
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,458
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Re: the lineup
Seriously? This is his change? Cito never ceases to confuse me.
Re: the lineup
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 11,501
- And1: 624
- Joined: Dec 19, 2008
-
Re: the lineup
Mustard_Tiger wrote:He finally changes the lineup, but does it by moving Vernon Wells up in the order? The guy that was struggling the most of anybody?
Cito is too funny.
the clean up spot is the most important position in a lineup not #3, i'm sure you know that though, he put our best hitter at 4. As for not moving Vernon down i'm certain its because he wants speed at the top of the lineup and i agree with him
Re: the lineup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,098
- And1: 3,629
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: the lineup
Modern_epic wrote:As for your point about a lack of speed in the bottom of the order, the number of times the speed difference comes into play probably isn't as valuable as the increased at bats and higher leverage of situations with where those two are batting now. Plus, when these situations come up late in games, you come to the one place Cito likes making in game moves: subbing the Prime Minister of Defence into the game as a pinch runner. That alone probably eliminates 25% of the time this is a potentially outcome affecting concern.
Speed difference came into play tonight!
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: the lineup
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,458
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Re: the lineup
Avenger wrote:the clean up spot is the most important position in a lineup not #3, i'm sure you know that though, he put our best hitter at 4. As for not moving Vernon down i'm certain its because he wants speed at the top of the lineup and i agree with him
Actually, according to people who have looked at this statistically, the number one spot in the order is pretty conclusively to be the most important spot. But four is probably a close second. Or maybe the number two spot. Not three, though.
And Rios is almost certainly faster than Wells, and having a better year, so I'm not sure what you are talking about with speed at the top of the order.
chocolateSensi wrote:Speed difference came into play tonight!
I didn't see the game, so I can't say for sure, but looking at that lineup, I'm guessing this is a joke? Rios and Inglett were both in the bottom half of the order...
Re: the lineup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,098
- And1: 3,629
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: the lineup
Modern_epic wrote:chocolateSensi wrote:Speed difference came into play tonight!
I didn't see the game, so I can't say for sure, but looking at that lineup, I'm guessing this is a joke? Rios and Inglett were both in the bottom half of the order...
Yeah. Rios stole 2nd, and then 3rd on the Barajas K, and then scored on a soft Inglett single. Inglett stole second, and then took 3rd on a wild pitch, and then scored on Hill's liner to left.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: the lineup
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,458
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Re: the lineup
Ah. I don't know if I would claim it 'came into play' in a game we lost so badly... but it is good to hear we are productively stealing bases.
Looking at the other side, though, if Rios's two hits were in the three spot like he used to be, he may have driven in some runs, which would also be nice.
Looking at the other side, though, if Rios's two hits were in the three spot like he used to be, he may have driven in some runs, which would also be nice.
Re: the lineup
- Raider917
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,700
- And1: 770
- Joined: Apr 14, 2009
- Location: Nova Scotia
-
Re: the lineup
wells goes 0/5 today 0/9 now as a #3 hitter
wells goes 0/3 today 0/12 now as a #3 hitter
wells goes 0/3 today 0/12 now as a #3 hitter
Re: the lineup
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,394
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Re: the lineup
Raider917 wrote:wells goes 0/5 today 0/9 now as a #3 hitter
wells goes 0/3 today 0/12 now as a #3 hitter
lol.. this is just...... sad...... wow, our franchise player folks!
Re: the lineup
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,486
- And1: 2,162
- Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Re: the lineup
In 1997, Joe Carter only batted 3rd or 4th in the Jays lineup. He had 668 plate appearances that year and 102 RBI.
His final line? .234/.284/.399 (.683 OPS).
So yeah, Cito is not going to move Vernon Wells, barring some sort of divine intervention. I still don't understand why he moved Rios, who while struggling, at least had an OPS in the .750 range. Wells is sub-.700.
His final line? .234/.284/.399 (.683 OPS).
So yeah, Cito is not going to move Vernon Wells, barring some sort of divine intervention. I still don't understand why he moved Rios, who while struggling, at least had an OPS in the .750 range. Wells is sub-.700.
Re: the lineup
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,793
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jan 16, 2009
Re: the lineup
Vernon has the experience in the 3 spot!
At least that's my guess on Cito's logic there.
At least that's my guess on Cito's logic there.