ImageImageImageImageImage

the lineup

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
Raider917
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 770
Joined: Apr 14, 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
       

Re: the lineup 

Post#21 » by Raider917 » Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:52 pm

why didnt i start this thread sooner?
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: the lineup 

Post#22 » by Modern_epic » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:40 am

Seriously? This is his change? Cito never ceases to confuse me.
Avenger
Banned User
Posts: 11,501
And1: 624
Joined: Dec 19, 2008
   

Re: the lineup 

Post#23 » by Avenger » Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:09 am

Mustard_Tiger wrote:He finally changes the lineup, but does it by moving Vernon Wells up in the order? The guy that was struggling the most of anybody?

Cito is too funny.

the clean up spot is the most important position in a lineup not #3, i'm sure you know that though, he put our best hitter at 4. As for not moving Vernon down i'm certain its because he wants speed at the top of the lineup and i agree with him
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,098
And1: 3,629
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: the lineup 

Post#24 » by s e n s i » Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:14 am

Modern_epic wrote:As for your point about a lack of speed in the bottom of the order, the number of times the speed difference comes into play probably isn't as valuable as the increased at bats and higher leverage of situations with where those two are batting now. Plus, when these situations come up late in games, you come to the one place Cito likes making in game moves: subbing the Prime Minister of Defence into the game as a pinch runner. That alone probably eliminates 25% of the time this is a potentially outcome affecting concern.


Speed difference came into play tonight!
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: the lineup 

Post#25 » by Modern_epic » Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:37 am

Avenger wrote:the clean up spot is the most important position in a lineup not #3, i'm sure you know that though, he put our best hitter at 4. As for not moving Vernon down i'm certain its because he wants speed at the top of the lineup and i agree with him


Actually, according to people who have looked at this statistically, the number one spot in the order is pretty conclusively to be the most important spot. But four is probably a close second. Or maybe the number two spot. Not three, though.

And Rios is almost certainly faster than Wells, and having a better year, so I'm not sure what you are talking about with speed at the top of the order.

chocolateSensi wrote:Speed difference came into play tonight!


I didn't see the game, so I can't say for sure, but looking at that lineup, I'm guessing this is a joke? Rios and Inglett were both in the bottom half of the order...
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,098
And1: 3,629
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: the lineup 

Post#26 » by s e n s i » Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:34 am

Modern_epic wrote:
chocolateSensi wrote:Speed difference came into play tonight!


I didn't see the game, so I can't say for sure, but looking at that lineup, I'm guessing this is a joke? Rios and Inglett were both in the bottom half of the order...


Yeah. Rios stole 2nd, and then 3rd on the Barajas K, and then scored on a soft Inglett single. Inglett stole second, and then took 3rd on a wild pitch, and then scored on Hill's liner to left.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: the lineup 

Post#27 » by Modern_epic » Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:45 pm

Ah. I don't know if I would claim it 'came into play' in a game we lost so badly... but it is good to hear we are productively stealing bases.

Looking at the other side, though, if Rios's two hits were in the three spot like he used to be, he may have driven in some runs, which would also be nice.
User avatar
Raider917
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 770
Joined: Apr 14, 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
       

Re: the lineup 

Post#28 » by Raider917 » Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:25 pm

wells goes 0/5 today 0/9 now as a #3 hitter
wells goes 0/3 today 0/12 now as a #3 hitter
evilRyu
General Manager
Posts: 8,394
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2006

Re: the lineup 

Post#29 » by evilRyu » Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:42 am

Raider917 wrote:wells goes 0/5 today 0/9 now as a #3 hitter
wells goes 0/3 today 0/12 now as a #3 hitter

lol.. this is just...... sad...... wow, our franchise player folks!
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 9,486
And1: 2,163
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

Re: the lineup 

Post#30 » by Michael Bradley » Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:27 am

In 1997, Joe Carter only batted 3rd or 4th in the Jays lineup. He had 668 plate appearances that year and 102 RBI.

His final line? .234/.284/.399 (.683 OPS).

So yeah, Cito is not going to move Vernon Wells, barring some sort of divine intervention. I still don't understand why he moved Rios, who while struggling, at least had an OPS in the .750 range. Wells is sub-.700.
Mustard_Tiger
Banned User
Posts: 4,793
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 16, 2009

Re: the lineup 

Post#31 » by Mustard_Tiger » Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:43 am

Vernon has the experience in the 3 spot!

At least that's my guess on Cito's logic there.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays