ImageImageImageImageImage

2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread

Moderator: JaysRule25

cHiNoz
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,254
And1: 14
Joined: Apr 23, 2002
         

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#241 » by cHiNoz » Fri Nov 7, 2025 2:42 pm

COY0607 wrote:
LoveMyRaps wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is shocking


Unless something changed dramatically overnight, Jays are +2000.
Next closest is NYY at +425


Bichette is -210 though
brwnman
Senior
Posts: 551
And1: 332
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
     

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#242 » by brwnman » Fri Nov 7, 2025 4:02 pm

Raptors Realtor wrote:
brwnman wrote:It's probably the WS high, and everyone wants Bo signed, but this is practically the same team that flamed out the previous year. They got contributions from unexpected contributors this year and I don't know if it's reasonable to expect that going into next year.

How are the Jays going to build around the core of Bo/Vlad? Right now, the only way to do it is by spending $$... but at some point, that well is going to be tapped dry. Will they finally build a pipeline to supplement the ML club, or will it just be via Free Agency?


I hear what you're saying, and you're not wrong, some regresssion by the likes of an aging Springer wouldn't be surprising. However, I think the difference between this year's team versus recent previous seasons is the very underrated addition of Popkins last offseason. This team had a far better approach at the plate, was well prepared to face not only our opponents starters, but their relief pitchers as well, hence all our late inning comeback wins this season. I think Popkins needs to be locked up asap to a long term contract because he's going to catch the attention of rival teams, if he hasn't already, and we don't need the likes of the Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc starting to pursue him at the earliest opportunity.


I think the addition of Popkins was likely the biggest factor for this offense. However, I think once the league adjusts to the new swing paths and new approach for players, they have to re-adjust. That's going to be something to watch. I don't think they need to worry about a long-term contract for a hitting coach. Twins let him go because their team was too hot and cold with little consistency. It led to one of their collapses and Jays almost had one down the stretch this year. Not necessarily Popkins fault, because in the end, it's on the players.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,552
And1: 22,609
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#243 » by Randle McMurphy » Fri Nov 7, 2025 4:26 pm

brwnman wrote:It's probably the WS high, and everyone wants Bo signed, but this is practically the same team that flamed out the previous year. They got contributions from unexpected contributors this year and I don't know if it's reasonable to expect that going into next year.

How are the Jays going to build around the core of Bo/Vlad? Right now, the only way to do it is by spending $$... but at some point, that well is going to be tapped dry. Will they finally build a pipeline to supplement the ML club, or will it just be via Free Agency?

Just become the Canadian Dodgers and money will solve any problems they have.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
brwnman
Senior
Posts: 551
And1: 332
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
     

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#244 » by brwnman » Fri Nov 7, 2025 4:59 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
brwnman wrote:It's probably the WS high, and everyone wants Bo signed, but this is practically the same team that flamed out the previous year. They got contributions from unexpected contributors this year and I don't know if it's reasonable to expect that going into next year.

How are the Jays going to build around the core of Bo/Vlad? Right now, the only way to do it is by spending $$... but at some point, that well is going to be tapped dry. Will they finally build a pipeline to supplement the ML club, or will it just be via Free Agency?

Just become the Canadian Dodgers and money will solve any problems they have.


It's the easiest solution for a bad management. Don't have faith in Rogers continuing to spend. Jays fans have proven time and time again, if the team doesn't win, they won't show up. Couple of bad years, and the purse strings tighten.
User avatar
Cyrus
Senior Mod - Raptors
Senior Mod - Raptors
Posts: 36,630
And1: 4,420
Joined: Jun 15, 2001
Location: Is taking his talents to South Beach!

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#245 » by Cyrus » Fri Nov 7, 2025 5:13 pm

We should be Dodgers East and go after:

Japanese slugger Munetaka Murakami - https://www.mlb.com/news/munetaka-murakami-mlb-star-potential-analysis

Apparently an 80 Grade on power! LOL Plays 3rd base - Though he has a lot of swing and miss:


On top of his outrageous power potential, Murakami has one key advantage over everyone else on this list: age. He’s 25 as of this writing and will turn 26 in February. Age is king on the open market, as we’ve seen with mega-deals for Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Juan Soto and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Murakami isn’t going to reach the heights of anyone from that group, but he’s selling four seasons of his 20s and all of his early 30s. A massive nine-figure deal feels genuinely possible, particularly if any teams out there think he can at least play even a passable third base for a year or two before sliding across the diamond.

There’s obvious risk in this profile. Miguel Sano jumps to mind as a faux third baseman with 80 power who could never make enough contact to stick even as a first baseman. On the flip side of the coin, there are scenarios where Murakami is effectively a lite version of Kyle Schwarber’s skill set — but eight years younger with more defensive value as a competent first baseman. The range of outcomes is all over the place on Murakami, but the upside here is tantalizing enough that we’re predicting a huge investment — likely one with opt-outs along the way.

Asianiac_24
General Manager
Posts: 8,674
And1: 4,106
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#246 » by Asianiac_24 » Fri Nov 7, 2025 5:42 pm

Better chance we move Vlad to 3rd and have Murakami play 1st base.
Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,618
And1: 3,547
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#247 » by Raptors Realtor » Fri Nov 7, 2025 5:49 pm

Cyrus wrote:We should be Dodgers East and go after:

Japanese slugger Munetaka Murakami - https://www.mlb.com/news/munetaka-murakami-mlb-star-potential-analysis

Apparently an 80 Grade on power! LOL Plays 3rd base - Though he has a lot of swing and miss:


On top of his outrageous power potential, Murakami has one key advantage over everyone else on this list: age. He’s 25 as of this writing and will turn 26 in February. Age is king on the open market, as we’ve seen with mega-deals for Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Juan Soto and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Murakami isn’t going to reach the heights of anyone from that group, but he’s selling four seasons of his 20s and all of his early 30s. A massive nine-figure deal feels genuinely possible, particularly if any teams out there think he can at least play even a passable third base for a year or two before sliding across the diamond.

There’s obvious risk in this profile. Miguel Sano jumps to mind as a faux third baseman with 80 power who could never make enough contact to stick even as a first baseman. On the flip side of the coin, there are scenarios where Murakami is effectively a lite version of Kyle Schwarber’s skill set — but eight years younger with more defensive value as a competent first baseman. The range of outcomes is all over the place on Murakami, but the upside here is tantalizing enough that we’re predicting a huge investment — likely one with opt-outs along the way.



We already have one of those guys in Santander, not sure we need another all or nothing hitter.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,552
And1: 22,609
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#248 » by Randle McMurphy » Fri Nov 7, 2025 6:03 pm

Raptors Realtor wrote:
Cyrus wrote:We should be Dodgers East and go after:

Japanese slugger Munetaka Murakami - https://www.mlb.com/news/munetaka-murakami-mlb-star-potential-analysis

Apparently an 80 Grade on power! LOL Plays 3rd base - Though he has a lot of swing and miss:


On top of his outrageous power potential, Murakami has one key advantage over everyone else on this list: age. He’s 25 as of this writing and will turn 26 in February. Age is king on the open market, as we’ve seen with mega-deals for Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Juan Soto and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Murakami isn’t going to reach the heights of anyone from that group, but he’s selling four seasons of his 20s and all of his early 30s. A massive nine-figure deal feels genuinely possible, particularly if any teams out there think he can at least play even a passable third base for a year or two before sliding across the diamond.

There’s obvious risk in this profile. Miguel Sano jumps to mind as a faux third baseman with 80 power who could never make enough contact to stick even as a first baseman. On the flip side of the coin, there are scenarios where Murakami is effectively a lite version of Kyle Schwarber’s skill set — but eight years younger with more defensive value as a competent first baseman. The range of outcomes is all over the place on Murakami, but the upside here is tantalizing enough that we’re predicting a huge investment — likely one with opt-outs along the way.



We already have one of those guys in Santander, not sure we need another all or nothing hitter.

Dodgers just won the WS because they had HR hitters throughout their lineup that could change the game on one swing (well that and Yamamoto).

Jays should be adding as much power as they possibly can.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
JN
RealGM
Posts: 20,646
And1: 10,956
Joined: Feb 02, 2007
   

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#249 » by JN » Fri Nov 7, 2025 6:04 pm

cHiNoz wrote:
COY0607 wrote:
LoveMyRaps wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is shocking


Unless something changed dramatically overnight, Jays are +2000.
Next closest is NYY at +425


Bichette is -210 though


Do you mean +200 or +2000.
Only reason I ask is that you say next closest is NYY at +425.

Just want to know if its +200 or +2000 as they both imply very different things about our potential chances
cHiNoz
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,254
And1: 14
Joined: Apr 23, 2002
         

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#250 » by cHiNoz » Fri Nov 7, 2025 6:11 pm

JN wrote:
cHiNoz wrote:
COY0607 wrote:
This is shocking


Unless something changed dramatically overnight, Jays are +2000.
Next closest is NYY at +425


Bichette is -210 though


Do you mean +200 or +2000.
Only reason I ask is that you say next closest is NYY at +425.

Just want to know if its +200 or +2000 as they both imply very different things about our potential chances


no it's +2000 (seems really unlikely we even attempt an offer)

Dodgers +325
NYY +425
MYM +450
Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,618
And1: 3,547
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#251 » by Raptors Realtor » Fri Nov 7, 2025 6:45 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
Raptors Realtor wrote:
Cyrus wrote:We should be Dodgers East and go after:

Japanese slugger Munetaka Murakami - https://www.mlb.com/news/munetaka-murakami-mlb-star-potential-analysis

Apparently an 80 Grade on power! LOL Plays 3rd base - Though he has a lot of swing and miss:



We already have one of those guys in Santander, not sure we need another all or nothing hitter.

Dodgers just won the WS because they had HR hitters throughout their lineup that could change the game on one swing (well that and Yamamoto).

Jays should be adding as much power as they possibly can.


Ya, but their main homerun hitters are guys like Ohtani, Freeman and Smith who also hit for average.
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 9,605
And1: 2,303
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#252 » by Michael Bradley » Fri Nov 7, 2025 7:02 pm

Murakami has trouble with high velocity and strikes out a ton. No chance the Jays are in on that guy, much less willing to outbid a bunch of teams to get him.
JCP11
Senior
Posts: 722
And1: 492
Joined: Apr 29, 2025

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#253 » by JCP11 » Fri Nov 7, 2025 7:02 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
Raptors Realtor wrote:
Cyrus wrote:We should be Dodgers East and go after:

Japanese slugger Munetaka Murakami - https://www.mlb.com/news/munetaka-murakami-mlb-star-potential-analysis

Apparently an 80 Grade on power! LOL Plays 3rd base - Though he has a lot of swing and miss:



We already have one of those guys in Santander, not sure we need another all or nothing hitter.

Dodgers just won the WS because they had HR hitters throughout their lineup that could change the game on one swing (well that and Yamamoto).

Jays should be adding as much power as they possibly can.

I don't think that's the main reason why they won. Yamamoto is honestly the biggest reason why they won, the offensive numbers throughout the playoffs and the WS favor the blue Jays except solo HRs. Varsho is a HR hitter with swing and miss and with all the opportunities he had if it was a contact guy Jays would be WS champions. I think they have plenty of power, they just need to upgrade the pitching.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,552
And1: 22,609
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#254 » by Randle McMurphy » Fri Nov 7, 2025 8:57 pm

JCP11 wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
Raptors Realtor wrote:
We already have one of those guys in Santander, not sure we need another all or nothing hitter.

Dodgers just won the WS because they had HR hitters throughout their lineup that could change the game on one swing (well that and Yamamoto).

Jays should be adding as much power as they possibly can.

I don't think that's the main reason why they won. Yamamoto is honestly the biggest reason why they won, the offensive numbers throughout the playoffs and the WS favor the blue Jays except solo HRs. Varsho is a HR hitter with swing and miss and with all the opportunities he had if it was a contact guy Jays would be WS champions. I think they have plenty of power, they just need to upgrade the pitching.

Uh yeah, that's the point. Solo HRs are a lot more helpful and impactful than singles, which the Jays hit a lot of. And if Varsho (or anybody else) hit one more HR in games 3, 6, or 7, they win the WS. Instead, the Dodgers closed the WS with 3 consecutive HRs.

Power still wins most of the time in MLB and it did again this season.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
JCP11
Senior
Posts: 722
And1: 492
Joined: Apr 29, 2025

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#255 » by JCP11 » Fri Nov 7, 2025 9:51 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
JCP11 wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:Dodgers just won the WS because they had HR hitters throughout their lineup that could change the game on one swing (well that and Yamamoto).

Jays should be adding as much power as they possibly can.

I don't think that's the main reason why they won. Yamamoto is honestly the biggest reason why they won, the offensive numbers throughout the playoffs and the WS favor the blue Jays except solo HRs. Varsho is a HR hitter with swing and miss and with all the opportunities he had if it was a contact guy Jays would be WS champions. I think they have plenty of power, they just need to upgrade the pitching.

Uh yeah, that's the point. Solo HRs are a lot more helpful and impactful than singles, which the Jays hit a lot of. And if Varsho (or anybody else) hit one more HR in games 3, 6, or 7, they win the WS. Instead, the Dodgers closed the WS with 3 consecutive HRs.

Power still wins most of the time in MLB and it did again this season.

It's still not the main reason why they lost. If the Jays had nobody on base and couldn't score I'd agree but they had many chances where all they needed was a simple sacrifice fly, a single or even a dribbler in the infield in all of games 3, 6 and 7. They put themselves in prime positions to win all of the games they lost where no HRs were necessarily needed. The Dodgers were the ones who needed those HRs they often couldn't do anything on offense throughout the series, they didn't even score more than 5 runs in any of the games and 2 games needed extra innings which is crazy. I'm not saying it's not important but it's FAR from the reason why Jays lost.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,395
And1: 14,445
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#256 » by dagger » Fri Nov 7, 2025 11:26 pm

Bellinger's wife apparently posted a photo of the CN Tower on Instagram. Can't verify if it's legit but it wouldn't surprise me, and of course, free agents want to goose the market with some intrigue
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,552
And1: 22,609
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#257 » by Randle McMurphy » Fri Nov 7, 2025 11:44 pm

dagger wrote:Bellinger's wife apparently posted a photo of the CN Tower on Instagram. Can't verify if it's legit but it wouldn't surprise me, and of course, free agents want to goose the market with some intrigue

That's a meme dating back to last offseason
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
polo007
General Manager
Posts: 9,454
And1: 3,097
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#258 » by polo007 » Sat Nov 8, 2025 4:04 am


vladdyjr27 • 4h

2025,

I KNEW YOU WOULD BE SPECIAL WHEN I KNEW I WOULD BE A BLUE JAY FOREVER.

I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO SAY. A YEAR THAT CHANGED MY LIFE. A YEAR THAT MADE ME APPRECIATE TIMES THAT DIDN’T MAKE SENSE. A YEAR I WILL FRAME FOREVER.

TO MY FAMILY, FANS, TEAMMATES, BLUE JAYS ORGANIZATION, AND MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL:

THE ABOVE WOULDN’T BE POSSIBLE TO SAY WITHOUT ALL OF YOU.

WE WERE BORN READY. WE STAY READY.

LOVE,

VLADDY
User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 29,285
And1: 13,578
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
     

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#259 » by SharoneWright » Sat Nov 8, 2025 5:07 am

HR’s are great.

In this particular World Series, the difference was also easy as Nathan Lukes not swinging at a single pitch delivered by Clayton Kershaw.
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,834
And1: 26,037
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: 2025 Blue Jays Offseason Thread 

Post#260 » by ItsDanger » Sat Nov 8, 2025 8:28 am

Blue Jays had numerous chances to win the series. Dodgers were fortunate it wasn't over in 5 games. You can't make firm conclusions on solo homers. Seattle hit solo homers and lost. Wonder what they think about that theory?
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays