ImageImageImage

Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET.

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
ElectricMayhem
RealGM
Posts: 10,242
And1: 11,452
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Location: Kobe-Osaka
 

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#261 » by ElectricMayhem » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:42 am

Tough loss, but luckily we don't have to face a backcourt like Blake and Meeks every night.
Tom Gores' Securus faced a class action lawsuit in 2024. The company engaged in a "quid pro quo kickback scheme" with county jails in Michigan which banned in-person visits in order to maximize revenue from voice and video calls.
User avatar
scrop32
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 26
Joined: Jan 30, 2012
 

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#262 » by scrop32 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:21 am

gusman wrote:
DetroitPistons wrote:Johnson: 6-7 from 3 (Smith's man)
Williams: 6-11 from 3 (also Smith's man)
Smith: 4-16 from the field

That is the story of the game. Period.

Get this clown out of here asap.


How can anyone dispute this logic?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


add this to his defensive lapses (he obviously can't guard mobile SFs he's a low IQ PF
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#263 » by DBC10 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:22 am

ElectricMayhem wrote:Tough loss, but luckily we don't have to face a backcourt like Blake and Meeks every night.
Lol. I think that sentence can be reused over and over again for this whole season, someone bet me. As long as our PnR defense continues to be turrible, games are always going to be frustrating like this.
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#264 » by DBC10 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:24 am

scrop32 wrote:
gusman wrote:
DetroitPistons wrote:Johnson: 6-7 from 3 (Smith's man)
Williams: 6-11 from 3 (also Smith's man)
Smith: 4-16 from the field

That is the story of the game. Period.

Get this clown out of here asap.


How can anyone dispute this logic?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


add this to his defensive lapses (he obviously can't guard mobile SFs he's a low IQ PF
Wow, I didn't even know we can quote vines like that, neat. Also at the same time, what's not neat is the atrocious D there. Hawks fans always said Josh had low BBIQ, but I thought they were overblowing it. It's starting to slowly reveal itself, no?

EDIT: Wait, they ran that exact same play last year, except it was Kobe passing the ball for the oop jam. Wow, really? D'Antoni just outcoached Cheeks right there.
User avatar
wire28
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,841
And1: 247
Joined: May 19, 2010
Location: right behind you....boo!

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#265 » by wire28 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:22 am

scrop32 wrote:
gusman wrote:
DetroitPistons wrote:Johnson: 6-7 from 3 (Smith's man)
Williams: 6-11 from 3 (also Smith's man)
Smith: 4-16 from the field

That is the story of the game. Period.

Get this clown out of here asap.


How can anyone dispute this logic?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


add this to his defensive lapses (he obviously can't guard mobile SFs he's a low IQ PF


OH COME ON! its the system, not the players!!1
Deeeeeetroit Basketballlllllll
DTP
General Manager
Posts: 8,479
And1: 6,765
Joined: May 04, 2006
Location: Ohio
     

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#266 » by DTP » Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:04 am

Don't be an idiot and I already commented on that play....ya know, when it happened.

D'Antoni is a offensive genius, the best part of that entire play isn't even caught on the vine. It happened before the play, the constant movement (distraction) from Young and Meeks which caught Smith. Should it happen? No. But sometimes, you just have to say great play and move on....that was a genius play.
menten
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,843
And1: 1,013
Joined: Dec 21, 2011

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#267 » by menten » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:05 am

i think we should trade our superstar rodney stuckey and tank for a high pick this year
princeofpalace
RealGM
Posts: 21,982
And1: 1,636
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#268 » by princeofpalace » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:16 am

Josh Smith 4-17, why is he constantly shooting the ball. He had an awesome rebounding game from but he was so deficient as a defender and a scorer. He's not fitting in here and TBH- we'd be better off without him. Josh kept shooting the ball despite being ice cold in the 4th and Greg- a guy who was dominating Gasol all night long, didn't get a single shot attempt. There is something very wrong that.

Why did Joe D sign him? Yes, he's talented but he's such a terrible offensive player it practically negates every good thing he does. We have 3 starters shooting under 40% from the field on a combined 37 FGA per game- this is what is killing us. I'll give KCP a pass since he's going throw rookie pains, but Jennings and Smith?

No, these guys were our 2 big acquisitions- they need to get it together. Jennings had a solid game, he made some big shots tonight but he needs to improve on his shooting for the rest of the season. Smith had another terrible offensive game.

We also need better production from our wings off the bench. We need to turn Singler/Jerebko/Datome into a real NBA caliber SF because we aren't good enough to have a wing rotation filled with nonplayers.
DetroitSho
Head Coach
Posts: 6,857
And1: 2,460
Joined: Sep 28, 2012

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#269 » by DetroitSho » Sat Nov 30, 2013 3:46 pm

DTP wrote:Don't be an idiot and I already commented on that play....ya know, when it happened.

D'Antoni is a offensive genius, the best part of that entire play isn't even caught on the vine. It happened before the play, the constant movement (distraction) from Young and Meeks which caught Smith. Should it happen? No. But sometimes, you just have to say great play and move on....that was a genius play.

If you're distracted by Jodie Meeks and Farmar square dancing 35 feet away from you enough to give up a back cut and wide open dunk, then that says alot about your awareness. Why are you giving a pass on stupid plays?

You mind telling me WTF was he doing when Nick Young was dribbling himself into a bad shot on the baseline and he's sagging off his man all the way on the other side and gives up the 3 to tie the game?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using RealGM Forums mobile app
E-Z
Pro Prospect
Posts: 763
And1: 213
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#270 » by E-Z » Sat Nov 30, 2013 3:54 pm

Detroit's P&R defense is laughable. They're ranked 21st in defending the ball handler, and dead last in defending the screener. Detroit's bigs hardly hedge screens, and the guards don't try to "ice" the ball handler often enough.

Elsewhere, they're 25th in defending possessions stemming from offensive rebounds, last in defending off ball screens. 29th in defending isolations as well.

Detroit's greatest weakness is the P&R defense. Teams run a P&R 30% of the time on average and Detroit can't do a thing about it right now. Cheeks should probably run a 2-3 zone and call it a season at this rate. I don't understand what's so difficult about instilling a defensive philosophy. Don't allow the middle for penetration. That's mostly it.
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#271 » by ImHeisenberg » Sat Nov 30, 2013 3:57 pm

menten wrote:i think we should trade our superstar rodney stuckey and tank for a high pick this year


Hilariously, he's probably our most valuable asset at this point. :lol:
User avatar
whitehops
General Manager
Posts: 8,313
And1: 7,018
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#272 » by whitehops » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:01 pm

DTP wrote: But they weren't crazy lobs or put backs, they were shots right in front or right next to the basket that he just blew. And in frustration, he made stupid fouls. What's his excuse for airballing the layup right next to the basket? He's 6'11....airballing layups is unacceptable but yet it happens way too often.

If you're seriously going to compare airballing a 20 footer and a 1 footer, I have no words for you.


he leads the league in field goal percentage, not sure what more you want from him. he's not allowed to shoot 50% in a game?

even LeBron misses layups.
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#273 » by DBC10 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:06 pm

DetroitSho wrote:
DTP wrote:Don't be an idiot and I already commented on that play....ya know, when it happened.

D'Antoni is a offensive genius, the best part of that entire play isn't even caught on the vine. It happened before the play, the constant movement (distraction) from Young and Meeks which caught Smith. Should it happen? No. But sometimes, you just have to say great play and move on....that was a genius play.

If you're distracted by Jodie Meeks and Farmar square dancing 35 feet away from you enough to give up a back cut and wide open dunk, then that says alot about your awareness. Why are you giving a pass on stupid plays?

You mind telling me WTF was he doing when Nick Young was dribbling himself into a bad shot on the baseline and he's sagging off his man all the way on the other side and gives up the 3 to tie the game?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using RealGM Forums mobile app
Combination of getting outcoached by D'Antoni and Smith's infamous BBIQ.
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#274 » by DBC10 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:13 pm

E-Z wrote:Detroit's P&R defense is laughable. They're ranked 21st in defending the ball handler, and dead last in defending the screener. Detroit's bigs hardly hedge screens, and the guards don't try to "ice" the ball handler often enough.

Elsewhere, they're 25th in defending possessions stemming from offensive rebounds, last in defending off ball screens. 29th in defending isolations as well.

Detroit's greatest weakness is the P&R defense. Teams run a P&R 30% of the time on average and Detroit can't do a thing about it right now. Cheeks should probably run a 2-3 zone and call it a season at this rate. I don't understand what's so difficult about instilling a defensive philosophy. Don't allow the middle for penetration. That's mostly it.
This is what I pointed out as well. Their PnR defense is not only bad from the eyetest, but statistically they're horrible.

Any teams with a semblance of good PnR offense is going to destroy this team inside and out. There is no philosophy of ICEing the PnR and no hard hedges to help the on-ball defender and to disrupt the plays.
E-Z
Pro Prospect
Posts: 763
And1: 213
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#275 » by E-Z » Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:42 pm

DBC10 wrote:
E-Z wrote:Detroit's P&R defense is laughable. They're ranked 21st in defending the ball handler, and dead last in defending the screener. Detroit's bigs hardly hedge screens, and the guards don't try to "ice" the ball handler often enough.

Elsewhere, they're 25th in defending possessions stemming from offensive rebounds, last in defending off ball screens. 29th in defending isolations as well.

Detroit's greatest weakness is the P&R defense. Teams run a P&R 30% of the time on average and Detroit can't do a thing about it right now. Cheeks should probably run a 2-3 zone and call it a season at this rate. I don't understand what's so difficult about instilling a defensive philosophy. Don't allow the middle for penetration. That's mostly it.
This is what I pointed out as well. Their PnR defense is not only bad from the eyetest, but statistically they're horrible.

Any teams with a semblance of good PnR offense is going to destroy this team inside and out. There is no philosophy of ICEing the PnR and no hard hedges to help the on-ball defender and to disrupt the plays.



I believe it's fair to say Cheeks isn't the man for the job here. 15+ games into the season and Detroit can't defend the most common play in basketball? Not due to a lack of skill or ability, but due to clueless players on the court.

I've seen Monroe and Drummond hang back in the paint allowing the ball-handler to beat his man off the screen. From there, the offense has too many options as Detroit's defense has collapsed. Sometimes I wonder if Detroit's players are even communicating when a screen is set.
Phenomenonsense
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,563
And1: 593
Joined: Nov 19, 2012
 

Re: Game 16. (6-9) vs. L.A. Lakers (8-8). 7:30PM ET. 

Post#276 » by Phenomenonsense » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:22 pm

Being at the game was incredibly depressing. Up 10 in the forth quarter I turn to my friend and ask him, "Why do I still feel like we're going to lose this game?" I was right, unfortunately. For whatever reason, Smith cannot be bothered to not sink into the paint and leave his 3 point shooter wide open all god damned night.

Return to Detroit Pistons