ImageImageImage

Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

sfballa13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,831
And1: 928
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#21 » by sfballa13 » Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:10 am

zeebneeb wrote:
sfballa13 wrote:
mattao313 wrote:I'm not certain but I'm pretty sure he didn't trade Smith because it would involve trading our pick.


We definitely could have moved Smith without trading the pick
Explain how you know this, and don't say becuase, or come up with a litany of reasons why. I want to see a trade, that was in the works that Stan failed to act upon.

You said definitely, so I assume you have a link/source of some kind showing and or detailing Stan's worst move as you put it.

I am really interested in discussing this, as it is the summer doldrums, and anything new to talk about is really welcomed.


Our discussions with Sacramento fell apart because SVG didn't want to take on Landry/Thompson/Derrick Williams. There was never mention of any pick in any of the rumors or articles.

Only thing that kept getting mentioned was that SVG didn't want to take on 10-13M of PF salaries without giving Smith a try.

We could have stretched Landry and kept Thompson who is partially guaranteed on the last year of his deal instead of stretching Smith for more money and destroying any team chemistry we might have established with him gone.

If Lance Stephenson and other trouble makers can get traded while on huge deals, Smith should have and could have been dealt as well.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#22 » by MotownMadness » Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:52 am

sfballa13 wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:
sfballa13 wrote:
We definitely could have moved Smith without trading the pick
Explain how you know this, and don't say becuase, or come up with a litany of reasons why. I want to see a trade, that was in the works that Stan failed to act upon.

You said definitely, so I assume you have a link/source of some kind showing and or detailing Stan's worst move as you put it.

I am really interested in discussing this, as it is the summer doldrums, and anything new to talk about is really welcomed.


Our discussions with Sacramento fell apart because SVG didn't want to take on Landry/Thompson/Derrick Williams. There was never mention of any pick in any of the rumors or articles.

Only thing that kept getting mentioned was that SVG didn't want to take on 10-13M of PF salaries without giving Smith a try.

We could have stretched Landry and kept Thompson who is partially guaranteed on the last year of his deal instead of stretching Smith for more money and destroying any team chemistry we might have established with him gone.

If Lance Stephenson and other trouble makers can get traded while on huge deals, Smith should have and could have been dealt as well.

I remember reading for sure that they were also requesting a 1st.

"According to Vince Ellis of the Detroit Free Press, the Pistons apparently decided to cut ties with Smith only after potential trade partners asked for a first-round pick to take his contract off Detroit's hands"
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

 

Post#23 » by Pharaoh » Sat Jul 25, 2015 5:26 am

At no stage did SVG have an offer for Smith that didn't include us giving up a first.

That is why talks broke down with the Kings.

I find it funny people complain about what SVG has done in 12 months...

Do we forget what he inherited from Joe?
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,492
And1: 13,022
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: 

Post#24 » by zeebneeb » Sat Jul 25, 2015 7:54 am

Pharaoh wrote:At no stage did SVG have an offer for Smith that didn't include us giving up a first.

That is why talks broke down with the Kings.

I find it funny people complain about what SVG has done in 12 months...

Do we forget what he inherited from Joe?
Well, I guess that ends that short loved notion. Giving up important assets, is not what I would call a good move. So it would seem that perhaps thus wasn't svg's worst move? Perhaps it was a good move to just cut him?
User avatar
kurtis48239
General Manager
Posts: 8,005
And1: 1,056
Joined: May 19, 2011
       

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#25 » by kurtis48239 » Sat Jul 25, 2015 1:14 pm

Stan inherited a mess,and did what he could do,in my eyes he has redemed himself and has shown that the whole smith/moose thing was just a big mess,and more than likely anyone that came in would have handled that wrong,just stepping in.

Stan has made this team way more balanced with alot of different avenues to take latter on down the line by not handcuffing ourselfs to moose.

My personal opinion on the moose loss,Nothing really.Its not like he is or is going to be a super star in this league.He also didnt want to be apart of what det was building.I also think ersan is going to fill his shoes just fine and people will love having a true stretch next to dre and watching a better balanced front court, no more watching moose look around like a deer in head lights and hold the ball to long instead of shooting a jumper, which is the problem,if moose cant get to within a few feet of the rim and use his foot work,hes pretty much useless at pf, and we already have a starting center.

I want to say that hopefuly we can get past the moose era and be done with it, but watching those 2 match up and dre dominating him,will carry on for at least a few seasons (hello knight) lol.
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,313
And1: 3,877
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#26 » by Mr Peanut » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:24 pm

The initial trade discussions with Sacramento last off-season were Smith for Jason Thompson/Derrick Williams or Carl Landry/Derrick Williams. No picks involved. Someone less lazy than me should be able to find the articles if they wanted.

Teams only started asking for a first as well when we got off to our horrible start and Smith was playing like turd.
princeofpalace
RealGM
Posts: 21,982
And1: 1,636
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#27 » by princeofpalace » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:26 pm

Mr Peanut wrote:The initial trade discussions with Sacramento last off-season were Smith for Jason Thompson/Derrick Williams or Carl Landry/Derrick Williams. No picks involved. Someone less lazy than me should be able to find the articles if they wanted.

Teams only started asking for a first as well when we got off to our horrible start and Smith was playing like turd.


Exactly this, I believe it was Woj who reported it. At the end of the day, I will chalk last offseason up to rookie mistakes. SVG has made subsequent moves to redeem the mistakes he made last offseason.
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#28 » by ImHeisenberg » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:55 pm

theBigLip wrote:The better question is "Why didn't Dumars trade Monroe at the deadline a year before?"


Because Dumars was exceptionally short sighted and his primary concern was retaining his job- not the future success of the team.

Any GM confident in their job would have traded an expiring Stuckey that season, he was playing well for a lottery team. They also probably would have been trying to trade Josh Smith for any kind of expiring deal, opposed to riding it out in hopes that it would eventually make him look good.

The guy was a complete failure as a GM once we lost Davidson as the owner.
Billl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,221
And1: 3,357
Joined: Sep 06, 2013

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#29 » by Billl » Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:34 pm

99% of reported trade offers are wrong, so I'm not sure what good finding a link would be. The only thing we can be certain of is that nobody was offering a straight salary dump mid-season or else SVG wouldn't have just eaten Smith's contract. Anything beyond that is just speculation.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#30 » by Blkbrd671 » Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:17 pm

Billl wrote:99% of reported trade offers are wrong, so I'm not sure what good finding a link would be. The only thing we can be certain of is that nobody was offering a straight salary dump mid-season or else SVG wouldn't have just eaten Smith's contract. Anything beyond that is just speculation.



WEll if you actually did google the propsed trade you'd see SVG actually acknowledges discussions but wasn't willing to put the franchise in a less flexible position. Looking back he was refering to the stretch provision. You just happen to comment on the 1%
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#31 » by Blkbrd671 » Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:21 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:
theBigLip wrote:The better question is "Why didn't Dumars trade Monroe at the deadline a year before?"


Because Dumars was exceptionally short sighted and his primary concern was retaining his job- not the future success of the team.

Any GM confident in their job would have traded an expiring Stuckey that season, he was playing well for a lottery team. They also probably would have been trying to trade Josh Smith for any kind of expiring deal, opposed to riding it out in hopes that it would eventually make him look good.

The guy was a complete failure as a GM once we lost Davidson as the owner.


Not true

You forget that Joe D was handicap'd by the owner situation. However where Joe D failed is that he never evolved like the rest of the league did with Statistians , scouting etc. He also didn't know how to let go ie not trading tay for a first rounder, stuckey, moose. Having the type of GM like SVG has made me realized, maybe it was a good thing that Joe D was handicap'd by the owners
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: Hindsight Greg Monroe trade to Milwaukee 

Post#32 » by ImHeisenberg » Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:56 pm

Blkbrd671 wrote:Not true

You forget that Joe D was handicap'd by the owner situation. However where Joe D failed is that he never evolved like the rest of the league did with Statistians , scouting etc. He also didn't know how to let go ie not trading tay for a first rounder, stuckey, moose. Having the type of GM like SVG has made me realized, maybe it was a good thing that Joe D was handicap'd by the owners


Fair enough, Dumars was making terrible decisions prior to Davidson's passing.

Return to Detroit Pistons