We should trade for Dinwiddie.
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
We should trade for Dinwiddie.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,729
- And1: 9,565
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
We should trade for Dinwiddie.
He is out for season which is perfect for us. Get his bird rights and sell him on being our #1 option next year.
Could Wright or Rose get it done for us? Would not include a future first for him but he is worth getting if the Nets just want another rotation player.
Could Wright or Rose get it done for us? Would not include a future first for him but he is worth getting if the Nets just want another rotation player.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,218
- And1: 3,352
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
No thanks. Just drafted our future pg. No need to stick a vet in front of him. Also, he's already 27.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
Rose for Dinwiddie + a 2nd rounder
Get Rose out of here and if Dinwiddie walks then whatever.
Get Rose out of here and if Dinwiddie walks then whatever.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- Han Solo
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,903
- And1: 7,696
- Joined: Jan 07, 2011
- Contact:
-
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
I don’t want anything to do with Dinwiddie. Brooklyn has championship aspirations though. Rose would be great for them.
Not sure what they have to offer though.
Not sure what they have to offer though.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- Han Solo
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,903
- And1: 7,696
- Joined: Jan 07, 2011
- Contact:
-
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
MotownMadness wrote:Rose for Dinwiddie + a 2nd rounder
Get Rose out of here and if Dinwiddie walks then whatever.
Rose is actually worth something decent. He’s a good fit on a lot of contenders. Think we will get back something decent for him this year.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 590
- And1: 281
- Joined: Feb 15, 2016
-
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
Kurucs and Claxton are interesting.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- vege
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,826
- And1: 4,803
- Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
We also should trade for Middletonn and Wood.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- BIG BEN'S FRO
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,162
- And1: 118
- Joined: Jan 23, 2002
- Location: Fort Wayne
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
Seems like we will have a decent chance at Cunningham or one of the many guards at the top of the lotto in 69 more games. Not sure I want to add there over the frontcourt.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,562
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
-
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
No.
While Dinwiddie isn't Blake, that kind of move has the same smell to it. Rushing around to improve RIGHT NOW. Give it time and build something the right way that's sustainable.
Now, obviously in today's NBA "sustainable" generally means 3 years or so and probably no more than 5, but that's today's reality. Players today are "now now now" relative to both money and championships so that's all that can realistically be expected. Build a championship team with mostly team-controlled young players and maybe a star or two, win a championship, then expect that some of the young players are then going to go after the most money available to them. Hopefully by that time a winning culture has been established such that a key player or two can leave, be replaced by a player or two who fit the culture, and keep winning at a high level.
While Dinwiddie isn't Blake, that kind of move has the same smell to it. Rushing around to improve RIGHT NOW. Give it time and build something the right way that's sustainable.
Now, obviously in today's NBA "sustainable" generally means 3 years or so and probably no more than 5, but that's today's reality. Players today are "now now now" relative to both money and championships so that's all that can realistically be expected. Build a championship team with mostly team-controlled young players and maybe a star or two, win a championship, then expect that some of the young players are then going to go after the most money available to them. Hopefully by that time a winning culture has been established such that a key player or two can leave, be replaced by a player or two who fit the culture, and keep winning at a high level.

Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,562
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
-
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
vege wrote:We also should trade for Middletonn and Wood.
May as well get Drummond too. Then tonight we'll have a party like it's 1989.

Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- vege
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,826
- And1: 4,803
- Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
Manocad wrote:vege wrote:We also should trade for Middletonn and Wood.
May as well get Drummond too. Then tonight we'll have a party like it's 1989.
Dinwiddie/Kennard/Middletton/Wood/Drummond would've been a good team.
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,562
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
-
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
vege wrote:Manocad wrote:vege wrote:We also should trade for Middletonn and Wood.
May as well get Drummond too. Then tonight we'll have a party like it's 1989.
Dinwiddie/Kennard/Middletton/Wood/Drummond would've been a good team.
I won’t argue that. Given where their careers/salaries are right now though (and assuming all their salaries are pretty fair), could that team be afforded under today’s salary cap? Admittedly I’m not a big salary cap numbers guy and don’t feel like doing the research, but it sure seems like that’s a lot of money.

Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- Uncle Mxy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,515
- And1: 2,252
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
- Location: I plead the Fifth Dimension
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
I'd only want Dinwiddie if I could pay him in virtual currency where I decide what it's worth. 

Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
- vege
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,826
- And1: 4,803
- Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
Manocad wrote:vege wrote:Manocad wrote:May as well get Drummond too. Then tonight we'll have a party like it's 1989.
Dinwiddie/Kennard/Middletton/Wood/Drummond would've been a good team.
I won’t argue that. Given where their careers/salaries are right now though (and assuming all their salaries are pretty fair), could that team be afforded under today’s salary cap? Admittedly I’m not a big salary cap numbers guy and don’t feel like doing the research, but it sure seems like that’s a lot of money.
Easily. We wouldn't even be close to the luxury tax. We would be able to use the MLE next year to add someone.
Khris Middleton 29 SF Bird $33,051,724
Andre Drummond 27 C Bird $28,751,775
Christian Wood 25 PF Sign $13,015,874
Luke Kennard 24 SG Bird $12,727,273
Spencer Dinwiddie27 PG Cap $11,454,048
Josh Jackson 23 SG Room $4,767,000
Sekou Doumbouya 19 SF Rookie $3,449,400
Killian Hayes 19 PG Rookie $5,307,120
Svia Mykhailiuk 23 SG Cap $1,663,861
Jahlil Okafor 24 C Minimum $1,882,867
Wayne Ellington 32 SG Minimum $2,564,753
Bruce Brown 24 SG NT-MLE $1,663,861
Total $120,299,556
2020 NBA Luxury Tax Threshold $132,627,000
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,746
- And1: 824
- Joined: Dec 06, 2015
-
Re: We should trade for Dinwiddie.
MotownMadness wrote:Rose for Dinwiddie + a 2nd rounder
Get Rose out of here and if Dinwiddie walks then whatever.
Rose and Ellington make 11 million, what Dinwiddie makes.
Rose and Ellington for Dinwiddie and Brooklynn's 2021 1st round pick?
Might be 30, might be a lot lower if Kyrie or Durant get injured.