6"6, 190lbs
Lives for the big moments, wants the ball in his hands, but can also play well off-ball. Smooth jumper, and his 36% from three is actually really good when you consider the shots he's having to take (late shot clock, end of games etc).
Cade needs someone who can also close out games, otherwise Cade will just get doubled. These two can both handle the moment.
It's Mathurin for me
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
It's Mathurin for me
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 201
- And1: 49
- Joined: May 27, 2010
Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,587
- And1: 4,464
- Joined: Aug 29, 2014
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
KCP, Ben McLemore, Malik Beasley type of player imo also doesn't look 6'6 either.
Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app
Championships
Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 9
- And1: 3
- Joined: May 07, 2022
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
At the combine it was discovered he is officially 6’4”. Many teams will not want to draft him top 7 as he may have to play SG instead of SF in NBA.
Re: It's Mathurin for me
- zeebneeb
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,481
- And1: 13,001
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
I like Mathurin, as he would be a good paring with Cade. Great hops for lobs, and a damn good shooter.
He is the safest of the possible picks to me, right next to Murray.
He is the safest of the possible picks to me, right next to Murray.
Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,323
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
I’m also team Mathurin.
Re: It's Mathurin for me
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,562
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
ajoyce wrote:At the combine it was discovered he is officially 6’4”. Many teams will not want to draft him top 7 as he may have to play SG instead of SF in NBA.
Unless they want a SG?
I’m not sure where the height/position thing makes much of a difference in his draft position. I would think that what he can/can’t do would be the determining factor.

Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,858
- And1: 2,442
- Joined: Feb 20, 2017
- Location: Bangkok
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
I'm alright with Mathurin if we attempted to trade up for Ivey but were rejected so chose him. I would prefer Daniels in a non Ivey position but I can walk away happy enough with any player but Murray.
Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,587
- And1: 4,464
- Joined: Aug 29, 2014
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
I'd rather have Murray than Mathurin he just seems like one of those dime a dozen 3&d ( or no d) SGsbuzzkilloton wrote:I'm alright with Mathurin if we attempted to trade up for Ivey but were rejected so chose him. I would prefer Daniels in a non Ivey position but I can walk away happy enough with any player but Murray.
Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app
Championships
Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- Junior
- Posts: 373
- And1: 76
- Joined: Jun 23, 2021
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
mattao313 wrote:KCP, Ben McLemore, Malik Beasley type of player imo also doesn't look 6'6 either.
Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app
He’s not. 6’4.5 without shoes on. If we want a long 2 then there are other players out there bigger than him
Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,323
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
He's taller than Ivey.
Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,963
- And1: 2,829
- Joined: Jun 01, 2013
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
SG sizes don't really matter much these days. Unless you're an athletic freight train like Anthony Edwards or a strong Butler type, you can easily skate by being 6'3, 6'4, 6'5 since every team likes to have a switch heavy and twitchy type of defense anyways
Re: It's Mathurin for me
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,323
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: It's Mathurin for me
That said, very few all-time greats (like top 20 all-time) are shorter than 6'6 (Curry is a notable exception in this way), so maybe if we're shooting for the moon, it should be Murray.