Trade Thread (TRADE WARS EPISODE V: The Empire Strikes Back)

Mylie10 · Post #281 » by **Mylie10** » Wed Feb 1, 2017 5:09 pm

Everytime I think about Morrow, I want him back...then I watch him play and the feeling goes away.

I would take him over Varejao for sure, but I think his salary wouldn't work, and no way would the Thunder want AV.

Mylie10 · Post #282 » by **Mylie10** » Wed Feb 1, 2017 5:10 pm

Honestly I'd look into TJ McConell. He's very under rated and he plays the game with toughness and makes good decisions. I doubt we'd be willing to trade what it would take to get him, but that's a guy I'd modestly target.

Post #283 » by **Andre Roberstan** » Wed Feb 1, 2017 5:58 pm

FNQ wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1519198&p=52038034#p52038034

What do you think of trying to get Anthony Morrow back?

Can you believe he's 31 now?

I don't think GSW has anything we'd want except for McCaw, and there's no way they'd do that. I honestly see him playing out his contract in OKC unless he's packaged with something else.

AdonalFoyle4Prez · Post #284 » by **AdonalFoyle4Prez** » Thu Feb 2, 2017 8:28 pm

I don't know if this player is needed, but what do you guys think about Greg Monroe? He's not a monster on defense, but he would give us a nice scoring, rebounding, and assisting big man to play behind or start before Zaza. In a way, I see why this wouldn't work out as Zaza can provide what he can at the fraction of what he's making.

Coxy · Post #285 » by **Coxy** » Thu Feb 2, 2017 8:58 pm

AdonalFoyle4Prez wrote:I don't know if this player is needed, but what do you guys think about Greg Monroe? He's not a monster on defense, but he would give us a nice scoring, rebounding, and assisting big man to play behind or start before Zaza. In a way, I see why this wouldn't work out as Zaza can provide what he can at the fraction of what he's making.

I think you answered your own question, but also under emphasised Monroe's defensive woes.

You also didn't look up Monroes salary either.

A HUGE no for Greg Monroe.

Mylie10 · Post #286 » by **Mylie10** » Sat Feb 4, 2017 1:16 am

Mylie10 wrote:
gsw213 wrote:On a serious note though Mylie, I still think this team needs to add a big and another shooter to the bench.

I think Clark shoots fine, and Livingston is shooting his highest career fg%.

I would love to add a SCORER to the bench though. Tough to find for nothing. And when you say big, I don't disagree, but who? That's the big question.

I might be in the minority here, but if their health checks out, I would love to add Jack and Landry for depth. They were studs for us back in the Jackson days and our system now would be good for them to rep their future value.

I mean seriously, Jack had several 20 point games for us in the playoffs against Denver and the Spurs. Landry was legit solid and closed out many games for us. Those two are tough minded, and have chemistry with our core three.

I know many can't stand Jacks ball pounding, but for what we could use, and how we play now, I'm sure he would fit right in. And Landry had a solid year last season for Philly. We could potentially get them dirt cheap, without giving up assets.....makes sense to me if their health is good.

So Briante it is for now. And I guess Jack and Landry are to longin the tooth at this point.

Phase 3 · Post #287 » by **Phase 3** » Sat Feb 4, 2017 8:17 pm

Mylie10 wrote:
Mylie10 wrote:
gsw213 wrote:On a serious note though Mylie, I still think this team needs to add a big and another shooter to the bench.

I think Clark shoots fine, and Livingston is shooting his highest career fg%.

I would love to add a SCORER to the bench though. Tough to find for nothing. And when you say big, I don't disagree, but who? That's the big question.

I might be in the minority here, but if their health checks out, I would love to add Jack and Landry for depth. They were studs for us back in the Jackson days and our system now would be good for them to rep their future value.

I mean seriously, Jack had several 20 point games for us in the playoffs against Denver and the Spurs. Landry was legit solid and closed out many games for us. Those two are tough minded, and have chemistry with our core three.

I know many can't stand Jacks ball pounding, but for what we could use, and how we play now, I'm sure he would fit right in. And Landry had a solid year last season for Philly. We could potentially get them dirt cheap, without giving up assets.....makes sense to me if their health is good.

So Briante it is for now. And I guess Jack and Landry are to longin the tooth at this point.

Kerr said they would look to do something in the next few weeks. I'm not sure if he was referring to Briante or a potential trade/buyout.

hamncheese · Post #288 » by **hamncheese** » Sat Feb 4, 2017 9:22 pm

gsw213 wrote:Kerr said they would look to do something in the next few weeks. I'm not sure if he was referring to Briante or a potential trade/buyout.

At shoot around today, Kerr said that Briante was one of five guards that the FO/scouts had been sending him tape of for the past month.

Quazza · Post #289 » by **Quazza** » Sun Feb 5, 2017 1:20 am

hamncheese wrote:
gsw213 wrote:Kerr said they would look to do something in the next few weeks. I'm not sure if he was referring to Briante or a potential trade/buyout.

At shoot around today, Kerr said that Briante was one of five guards that the FO/scouts had been sending him tape of for the past month.

compared him to Beverly

that would be nice

Coxy · Post #290 » by **Coxy** » Sun Feb 5, 2017 1:43 am

Quazza wrote:
hamncheese wrote:
gsw213 wrote:Kerr said they would look to do something in the next few weeks. I'm not sure if he was referring to Briante or a potential trade/buyout.

At shoot around today, Kerr said that Briante was one of five guards that the FO/scouts had been sending him tape of for the past month.

compared him to Beverly

that would be nice

Yeah, but without the mouth.

Beverley needs a straight punch in the mouth.

Quazza · Post #291 » by **Quazza** » Sun Feb 5, 2017 2:06 am

Coxy wrote:
Quazza wrote:
hamncheese wrote:
At shoot around today, Kerr said that Briante was one of five guards that the FO/scouts had been sending him tape of for the past month.

compared him to Beverly

that would be nice

Yeah, but without the mouth.

Beverley needs a straight punch in the mouth.

no argument's from me there homie

Post #292 » by **Andre Roberstan** » Tue Feb 7, 2017 6:15 pm

https://theathletic.com/37420/2017/02/07/kevin-durants-decision-and-the-new-cba/

I haven't crosschecked all of this, but I think the numbers are all correct.

Post #293 » by **Andre Roberstan** » Tue Feb 7, 2017 6:15 pm

Quazza wrote:
Coxy wrote:
Quazza wrote:

compared him to Beverly

that would be nice

Yeah, but without the mouth.

Beverley needs a straight punch in the mouth.

no argument's from me there homie

One of the few things we can agree on

likashing · Post #294 » by **likashing** » Wed Feb 15, 2017 10:20 pm

Drummond and Reggie Jackson available...

Quazza · Post #295 » by **Quazza** » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:44 am

likashing wrote:Drummond and Reggie Jackson available...

DRummond has been playing like he checked out ages ago

(funnily enough his attitude was the biggest knock on him coming out of school too)

ILOVEIT · Post #296 » by **ILOVEIT** » Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:19 am

Quazza wrote:
likashing wrote:Drummond and Reggie Jackson available...

DRummond has been playing like he checked out ages ago

(funnily enough his attitude was the biggest knock on him coming out of school too)

I've been calling him overated for two years now.....Such hype for a guy with no moves and bricks for hands....

Now we find he has no motor....eh.

Coxy · Post #297 » by **Coxy** » Thu Feb 23, 2017 5:34 am

ILOVEIT wrote:
Quazza wrote:
likashing wrote:Drummond and Reggie Jackson available...

DRummond has been playing like he checked out ages ago

(funnily enough his attitude was the biggest knock on him coming out of school too)

I've been calling him overated for two years now.....Such hype for a guy with no moves and bricks for hands....

Now we find he has no motor....eh.

I only had to listen to that guy speak once and I knew he had the fire of a sloth on ritalin. Just too placid and meek.

and1GS · Post #298 » by **and1GS** » Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:49 pm

Coxy wrote:
ILOVEIT wrote:
Quazza wrote:
DRummond has been playing like he checked out ages ago

(funnily enough his attitude was the biggest knock on him coming out of school too)

I've been calling him overated for two years now.....Such hype for a guy with no moves and bricks for hands....

Now we find he has no motor....eh.

I only had to listen to that guy speak once and I knew he had the fire of a sloth on ritalin. Just too placid and meek.

With natural ability like his I think itd be best if someone groomed him into a Camby role. 20-28 mpg, D and boards only. He could do the DeAndre role well too with more mpg, you just can't win with him as a top offense option.

Kuya · Post #299 » by **Kuya** » Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Devin Booker for Klay this offseason.

Would you as a dubs fan?
Would you as a Suns organization?

Both can be #1 options. Both can go supernova.

Klay is more proven, a champion and Olympian in the early years of his prime.

Devin Booker is younger and has a slightly higher ceiling than Klay.

Personally, im on the fence. I just wanted to spark conversation. Id lean towards keeping Splash Bros together

Sent from my SM-N920T using RealGM mobile app

Coxy · Post #300 » by **Coxy** » Sun Mar 26, 2017 10:06 pm

Kuya wrote:Devin Booker for Klay this offseason.

Would you as a dubs fan?
Would you as a Suns organization?

Both can be #1 options. Both can go supernova.

Klay is more proven, a champion and Olympian in the early years of his prime.

Devin Booker is younger and has a slightly higher ceiling than Klay.

Personally, im on the fence. I just wanted to spark conversation. Id lean towards keeping Splash Bros together

Sent from my SM-N920T using RealGM mobile app

As good and young and cheap as Booker is, I don't think you break up the chemistry of the Splash Fam now.