ImageImageImageImageImage

Would you be willing to take CWeb if the price is right?

Moderators: Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose

I would be willing to take in CWeb for vet's minimum

I'd be willing to take in CWeb for more than the vet's min.
9
38%
I'd be willing to take in CWeb for more than 1 year
3
13%
I'd be willing to use part of our TPE to bring in CWeb
3
13%
I'd be willing to use all of our TPE to bring in CWeb
0
No votes
I would not be willing to take in CWeb under any conditions
9
38%
 
Total votes: 24

turk3d
RealGM
Posts: 36,652
And1: 1,275
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Javale McGee, Dubs X Factor

Would you be willing to take CWeb if the price is right? 

Post#1 » by turk3d » Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:44 pm

If he was willing to take the vet's minimum would you take CWeb?

If so, how much would you be willing to pay him?

Would you be willing to do an S & T with Detroit and give him part of our TPE? If so, how much would you be willing to give him.

Just curious how most of the posters feel about this?
Draymond Green: Exemplifies Warrior Leadership, Hustle, Desire, Versatility, Toughness, fearlessness, Grit, Heart,Team Spirit, Sacrifice
Image
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#2 » by Sid the Squid » Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:52 pm

A few points that don't need to be made..

1. Harrington is not going to play less minutes at C...OK..If you think Nellie plans on slowing our pace..you havnt been paying attention to anything..

2. Webber will either be our backup C or starting C...Biedrins and Webber will split up around 30 minutes of PT...This will mean more minutes for Andris to visit with Brandan and Patrick on the bench.

3. Anybody who thinks Nellie is about to cut down on smallball needs to get HIS FREAKIN HEAD EXAMINED!!...



Now back to the poll.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,642
And1: 9,447
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: De-funked
     

 

Post#3 » by FNQ » Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:54 pm

Poll is screwed up :lol:

Guess where my vote went... that's right. It went to "Fire Nelson"
Keepin it classless
Watching the easily manipulated be easily manipulated
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,418
And1: 54
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

 

Post#4 » by Hopper15 » Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:58 pm

LF75 wrote:A few points that don't need to be made..

1. Harrington is not going to play less minutes at C...OK..If you think Nellie plans on slowing our pace..you havnt been paying attention to anything..

2. Webber will either be our backup C or starting C...Biedrins and Webber will split up around 30 minutes of PT...This will mean more minutes for Andris to visit with Brandan and Patrick on the bench.

3. Anybody who thinks Nellie is about to cut down on smallball needs to get HIS FREAKIN HEAD EXAMINED!!

:lol: I guess I'm hoping that won't be the case.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,642
And1: 9,447
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: De-funked
     

 

Post#5 » by FNQ » Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:59 pm

I cannot believe some of the people who have problems with GP's personality aren't expressing the same concerns for Webber's... GP's a great teammate... Webber won't go inside...

Convenience arguments are the best :nod: Don't go holding all players to the same kind of accountability... that's not the Warrior way :noway:
Keepin it classless
Watching the easily manipulated be easily manipulated
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,418
And1: 54
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

 

Post#6 » by Hopper15 » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:08 pm

If Payton were 6'10 and could replace Pietey at PF and Al at C, I'd be all for it.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,642
And1: 9,447
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: De-funked
     

 

Post#7 » by FNQ » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:10 pm

You're gonna give Nellie ideas...
Keepin it classless
Watching the easily manipulated be easily manipulated
turk3d
RealGM
Posts: 36,652
And1: 1,275
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Javale McGee, Dubs X Factor

 

Post#8 » by turk3d » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:42 pm

Man, I screwed up. I left off the most important choice: paying him vets min which is what I would pick. Sorry guys, my bad.
Draymond Green: Exemplifies Warrior Leadership, Hustle, Desire, Versatility, Toughness, fearlessness, Grit, Heart,Team Spirit, Sacrifice
Image
MbengaforMVP
Freshman
Posts: 52
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2008

 

Post#9 » by MbengaforMVP » Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:38 am

Last I saw, Webber had gotten slow and his shot was off...if that's still the case, I wouldn't want him on the team at all. If he's whipped himself into playing shape, then vet's minimum.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

 

Post#10 » by old rem » Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:07 am

LF75 wrote:A few points that don't need to be made..

1. Harrington is not going to play less minutes at C...OK..If you think Nellie plans on slowing our pace..you havnt been paying attention to anything..

2. Webber will either be our backup C or starting C...Biedrins and Webber will split up around 30 minutes of PT...This will mean more minutes for Andris to visit with Brandan and Patrick on the bench.

3. Anybody who thinks Nellie is about to cut down on smallball needs to get HIS FREAKIN HEAD EXAMINED!!...



Now back to the poll.


8) Lf is right....Webber would basically be the slower Croshere...at best..And would bitch and moan over the fact he'd seldom see over 10 min. No chance the W's spend a dime of TPE. Not to get a guy the Sixers PAID OFF asnd the Pistons felt was not near as useful as Maxiel...at any price. Webber has not played D in a few years and his shot selection ain't good. Further....he lobbied for MULLIN to get traded...then did his power trip when it was Owens-his buddy-- instead. Keep in mind, Sprewell had a good attitude until Webber taught him to be a manipulative SOB.

There are SLOW teams with no bench,who do not have a history with Webb....and none of them wants him at even low$
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
-bob-
RealGM
Posts: 19,980
And1: 28
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
       

 

Post#11 » by -bob- » Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:42 am

Marc Stein says...

"The Warriors have offered to sign him for the rest of the season for a pro-rated share of the league's $1.2 million veteran minimum."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3217920
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#12 » by crzy » Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:57 am

I'm down with the prorated vet min. Low risk move.
Image
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 37,448
And1: 8,130
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

 

Post#13 » by Mylie10 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:00 am

Nellie with the pregame all but confirmed that he's comin in.

Nellie doesn't usually go public before things happen.

No better than Austin Croshere? They're pretty different players if you ask me.

Croshere cannot pass the ball anywhere near Web.

Webber cannot run or get up in the air like Austin still can.

The question is can either guy stay healthy.
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#14 » by Sid the Squid » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:10 am

O'Bryant > Webber

Croshere > Webber

Webber > the MBENGA

Webber > Pat Burke

Webber > Perovic
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 37,448
And1: 8,130
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

 

Post#15 » by Mylie10 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:17 am

LF75 wrote:O'Bryant > Webber

Croshere > Webber

Webber > the MBENGA

Webber > Pat Burke

Webber > Perovic


I'll go:

Obee>Web

Web> Austin

Web> Burke/Benga

Web> Pietrus

Al > Web except rebounding then Web > Al

Web = Kosta JK
The_Believer
Pro Prospect
Posts: 810
And1: 0
Joined: May 20, 2007
Location: The Bay

 

Post#16 » by The_Believer » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:35 am

We could always get a time machine to get CWebb back to his prime.
User avatar
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 16,030
And1: 398
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

 

Post#17 » by Twinkie defense » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:41 am

[quote="Hopper15"]If Payton were 6'10 and could replace Pietey at PF and Al at C, I'd be all for it.[/quote]

:rofl:

You're gonna be changin yer tune when Al shuts Yao down again this week!
User avatar
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 16,030
And1: 398
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

 

Post#18 » by Twinkie defense » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:43 am

[quote="turk3d"]Man, I screwed up. I left off the most important choice: paying him vets min which is what I would pick. Sorry guys, my bad.[/quote]

I think you can still add that option. Not like that's "scientific," but that's no surprise!
User avatar
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 16,030
And1: 398
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

 

Post#19 » by Twinkie defense » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:49 am

Mylie10 wrote:No better than Austin Croshere? They're pretty different players if you ask me.

The question is can either guy stay healthy.


exactly

One thing C-Webb will have going for him are very low expectations.
User avatar
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 16,030
And1: 398
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

 

Post#20 » by Twinkie defense » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:58 am

old rem wrote: 8) Lf is right....Webber would basically be the slower Croshere...at best..And would bitch and moan over the fact he'd seldom see over 10 min..


That's why this is a pure revenge move! Brilliant! Nellie would do the same to Cohan, if he could! :rofl:

Either that or he gets major minutes at PG.

Return to Golden State Warriors