Image Image Image Image

If Michael Johnson falls to 49...

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

BullHeaded
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,643
And1: 195
Joined: Jun 13, 2006

If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#1 » by BullHeaded » Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:12 pm

Should we forgo WR for a later round? The argument for a pass rusher if a value guy falls is pretty big:

1. We have a need. Ogunleye is aging and only has a little more time left under contract, Mark Anderson is entering his last year, and we totally underperformed in getting sacks from the DL last year.

2. We have probably the two best off season additions when it comes to providing grade-A development to a young DE. Rod Marinelli as the DL coach, and Orlando Pace as the LT a young DE will have to work against during training camp.

Michael Johnson has unique size/speed/strength to make him an ideal prospect if he falls. Also, if he falls, its possible its because there was a run on WRs which would make the value of selecting one at 49 substantially less. Just food for thought.
User avatar
dingojazz
Senior
Posts: 562
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Jerry Sloan's Doghouse

Re: If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#2 » by dingojazz » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:54 pm

I would be happy with picking Johnson or another defender provided the receivers like Nicks and Robiskie are gone.

Another DE I like who's not quite the freak Michael Johnson is but is much less risky is Paul Kruger from Utah.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,115
And1: 10,732
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#3 » by NZB2323 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:59 pm

I say yes. I've already explained why here:

viewtopic.php?f=156&t=895777&start=0
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

Re: If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#4 » by Cliff Levingston » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:54 pm

Cliff Levingston is hoping Nicks falls to us at #49 but wouldn't be surprised if Angelo goes with a defensive end like Johnson if he's there as well (or if he's there and Nicks is not, etc).
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

Re: If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#5 » by emperorjones » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:45 pm

If we go for a DE at 49, it might mean Marinelli doesn't think we have the guys in house to get the job done. It would worry me, but I'd actually be happy with that pick. We could probably get the same WR at 99 that we'd select at 49 (I'm assuming Johnson dropping would mean a run on WR)
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,886
And1: 862
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#6 » by karch34 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:31 pm

I think you'd have to take him if he drops to 49. Alex Brown dropped to the 4th when he graded out as 1st round talent, so he'd be a great mentor for him.

If that's the case, then I look closer at taking 2 WRs in the subsequent rounds. The guys are more speculative there, but Derrick Williams, Brandon Tate, Mike Wallace, Ramses Barden and others all look like they have some potential so you hope we hit on one of them and sign a veteran WR as well.
Pax for Prez
Starter
Posts: 2,408
And1: 380
Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Location: avoiding the WIFE

Re: If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#7 » by Pax for Prez » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:12 pm

At # 49 we need a diffence maker!!

I would take the Highest Rated Player at any of the following positions:

WR (Davis, Bennett)
DE (Ogunleye)
FS (Bullocks, Bowman)
OLB (Roach, Hillenmeyer)
User avatar
NoSkyy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,014
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 20, 2007

Re: If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#8 » by NoSkyy » Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:25 pm

If he's there, I wouldn't mind picking him up. He is a freak and did work out well and a hands on development coach like Marinelli might help him.

Now, if a good WR (Robsikie, Nicks etc) or like a good FS was there...I donno.
User avatar
Chewie
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,675
And1: 336
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
       

Re: If Michael Johnson falls to 49... 

Post#9 » by Chewie » Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:40 pm

Could've sworn we had this exact same topic elsewhere but I'd take him if one of the top WRs didn't slip. He looks like more of an athlete than a football player but at #49 that's good value.
Turn down for what?

Return to Chicago Bears