RealGM Bears Preview
Moderator: chitownsports4ever
RealGM Bears Preview
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 26,564
- And1: 4,191
- Joined: Jan 21, 2005
- Location: Dallas
RealGM Bears Preview
http://www.realgmfootball.com/src_teama ... ago_bears/
Written by everyone's favorite analyst, Icness.
Written by everyone's favorite analyst, Icness.
- TylerB
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,181
- And1: 98
- Joined: Jun 15, 2003
- Location: West Chicago
Wow what a terrible analysis of this team.
We lose Alfonso Boone and Ian Scott while adding Dusty Dvoracek, Darwin Walker, and Anthony Adams. CLEARLY making a huge upgrade in talent and depth at the DT position and he writes,
"DT has gone from a position of strength to a major question mark. Other than Tommie Harris, this group offers little upfield punch, something critical to their Cover 2 scheme."
If you get to write these previews at least attempt some research.
It is full of countless other ignorant and idiotic comments, I'll highlite one.... "Head Coach Lovie Smith proved he is prone to unacceptable gaffes, and his stubbornness at sticking tight to his gameplan makes the Bears pretty easy to prepare for."
Where does that even come from?
We lose Alfonso Boone and Ian Scott while adding Dusty Dvoracek, Darwin Walker, and Anthony Adams. CLEARLY making a huge upgrade in talent and depth at the DT position and he writes,
"DT has gone from a position of strength to a major question mark. Other than Tommie Harris, this group offers little upfield punch, something critical to their Cover 2 scheme."
If you get to write these previews at least attempt some research.
It is full of countless other ignorant and idiotic comments, I'll highlite one.... "Head Coach Lovie Smith proved he is prone to unacceptable gaffes, and his stubbornness at sticking tight to his gameplan makes the Bears pretty easy to prepare for."
Where does that even come from?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,694
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 26, 2005
- Location: Great plains - Big sky- dust bowl
How can we address a really serious objection to the authorites of RealGM about this jerk's malfeasance.
His azz needs to go because his irritating remarks were more based in ignorance than plain old bias or homerism. Just totally unqualified.
And thereby reflects on RealGm as a viable reference or reporting source.
His azz needs to go because his irritating remarks were more based in ignorance than plain old bias or homerism. Just totally unqualified.
And thereby reflects on RealGm as a viable reference or reporting source.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,601
- And1: 133
- Joined: Dec 03, 2006
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
-
Joe Jackson wrote:How can we address a really serious objection to the authorites of RealGM about this jerk's malfeasance.
His azz needs to go because his irritating remarks were more based in ignorance than plain old bias or homerism. Just totally unqualified.
And thereby reflects on RealGm as a viable reference or reporting source.
Give me a break this article wasn't that bad.
I have seen worse from ESPN
- Posey H8er
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,095
- And1: 64
- Joined: Jan 07, 2007
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 22,691
- And1: 4,085
- Joined: Jan 30, 2002
- Location: southside of chicago
-
Dont be too hard on the guy he has to write for so many teams mainly due to the lack of writers.Everyone is free to inquire about writing team previews,reviews or even weekly monday morning game recaps.Based on many of your posts I think some of you would make excellent editorial writers as well.
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
- Jello Biafra
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,847
- And1: 420
- Joined: May 28, 2003
- Location: At a 12 step meeting near you
- Contact:
-
Let him say what he wants. Same thing with the Grossman critics. The cool thing about sports is that the Bears will either prove or disprove his analysis on the field. the only thing that worries me is that the Bears have a tough start to the season. If Grossman does not perform well, the pressure on him, and the rest of the team will be enormous.
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
I did indeed write the preview. Just a couple of general observations:
1. Lighten up folks! This team could win the division by Thanksgiving with Kyle Orton at QB, but it's not the flawless statue of David y'all believe it is. You'll feel a lot better when the inevitable adversity strikes if you temper your expectations of absolute perfection and conformity. Forgive me for being Jay Mariotti-esque and not drinking the full glass of Kool Aid. Nobody wanted to hear about how flawed the White Sox were this spring, or how the Bulls weren't as close as everyone thought either. Just don't be like Detroit people and turn on guys you worship now when they're gone or no longer meeting expectation.
2. I've spent more time in Burbonnais than any sane person would ever want to. I've seen this team up close and personal. I do know for a fact that Lovie motivated Tillman and Vasher by telling them over and over again that they were playing for the same deal. I've seen how Benson slowly won his teammates over (it's night and day from last summer), how truly bad the backups at OL, DT and LB are, the frustration the defense has when they have to not rush Rex so he can successfully complete a basic drill. You can question my opinions all you want (I welcome that--it's why we're here), but don't forget about me when I'm right either. FWIW I called for 10-6 and an early playoff loss for the Bears last year, so my relative negativity is probably overblown once again.
3. I'm not a Bears fan but I am far from a Bears hater. There's only two teams I actively root against--the Cowboys and the Ravens. I absolutely love Jerry Angelo as GM and I'm a big fan of Tommie Harris, Nate Vasher, and Des Clark.
As someone else said, we're actively seeking good writers with something to say. During the season I pretty much only do game picks for the site, so there is plenty of room for team analysis and more in-depth pieces on individual teams. I'll even help you out if you ask nicely
1. Lighten up folks! This team could win the division by Thanksgiving with Kyle Orton at QB, but it's not the flawless statue of David y'all believe it is. You'll feel a lot better when the inevitable adversity strikes if you temper your expectations of absolute perfection and conformity. Forgive me for being Jay Mariotti-esque and not drinking the full glass of Kool Aid. Nobody wanted to hear about how flawed the White Sox were this spring, or how the Bulls weren't as close as everyone thought either. Just don't be like Detroit people and turn on guys you worship now when they're gone or no longer meeting expectation.
2. I've spent more time in Burbonnais than any sane person would ever want to. I've seen this team up close and personal. I do know for a fact that Lovie motivated Tillman and Vasher by telling them over and over again that they were playing for the same deal. I've seen how Benson slowly won his teammates over (it's night and day from last summer), how truly bad the backups at OL, DT and LB are, the frustration the defense has when they have to not rush Rex so he can successfully complete a basic drill. You can question my opinions all you want (I welcome that--it's why we're here), but don't forget about me when I'm right either. FWIW I called for 10-6 and an early playoff loss for the Bears last year, so my relative negativity is probably overblown once again.
3. I'm not a Bears fan but I am far from a Bears hater. There's only two teams I actively root against--the Cowboys and the Ravens. I absolutely love Jerry Angelo as GM and I'm a big fan of Tommie Harris, Nate Vasher, and Des Clark.
As someone else said, we're actively seeking good writers with something to say. During the season I pretty much only do game picks for the site, so there is plenty of room for team analysis and more in-depth pieces on individual teams. I'll even help you out if you ask nicely

- TylerB
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,181
- And1: 98
- Joined: Jun 15, 2003
- Location: West Chicago
Icness wrote:I've seen how Benson slowly won his teammates over (it's night and day from last summer), how truly bad the backups at OL, DT and LB are,
We have the DEEPEST group of defensive tackles in the NFL and our Oline depth is better than average with St. Claire and Metcalf. Both who have started a lot of games in this league. St. Claire has 34 NFL starts and Metcalf has 20. They don't suck, they are actually quality backup linemen in this league whether you want to admit it or not.
You can just make things up and say all those players are terrible but it doesn't make it true. It almost seems like you watched the backup line in on offense or defense and watched them get beat, ignoring that most of those guys won't even make the team and decided all the backups must suck.
We have Darwin Walker and Anthony Adams as BACKUP defensive tackles, thats an enormous upgrade over Boone and Scott. Not a slight upgrade, an enormous upgrade. Boone did not fit the system and Scott was physically limited.
How bad can Jamar Williams be when every report out of camp described him as being a future stud?
It isn't about agreeing or disagreeing with your opinions, you claimed the possible deepest group of DTs in the NFL has no depth and you claimed an offensive line with two PROVEN veterans off the bench has no depth. Its absurd and insulting, do your homework, don't go watch training camp because you don't know what you are looking at. Research the actual players on the roster.
the frustration the defense has when they have to not rush Rex so he can successfully complete a basic drill.
Did you really even make this statement? Rex had great practice after great practice. It is common NFL, college, and HS practice not to sack the QB in drills so he can throw the ball.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
Icness wrote:1. Lighten up folks! This team could win the division by Thanksgiving with Kyle Orton at QB, but it's not the flawless statue of David y'all believe it is. You'll feel a lot better when the inevitable adversity strikes if you temper your expectations of absolute perfection and conformity. Forgive me for being Jay Mariotti-esque and not drinking the full glass of Kool Aid. Nobody wanted to hear about how flawed the White Sox were this spring, or how the Bulls weren't as close as everyone thought either. Just don't be like Detroit people and turn on guys you worship now when they're gone or no longer meeting expectation.
Cliff Levingston for one doesn't think the Bears will be a powerhouse of epic proportions like you hinted at with the statue reference. 11-5 playing a tough schedule would be a nice feat.
The Bulls and the Sox references are poor as well. Everyone knew the Sox wouldn't be that good after trading two of their best pitchers, it's just that no one thought they'd be as bad as they are. Same for the Bulls pretty much. We all knew they'd be good and expected them to get out of the first round, but didn't expect a whole lot more than that. No one in their right mind thought we'd win the championship.
We're talking about a team coming off a superbowl appearance as the head-and-shoulders best team in the NFC last year, and we had no significant losses unless you think TJ is much better than he is... like most people.
- Archuleta is a great pickup at SS and played stellar play under Lovie and the Cover 2 scheme, allowing Mike Brown to return to free safety where he played great for us from about 2001 - 2004.
- At the DT position, Darwin Walker is an upgrade over Tank Johnson and Adam/Dvoracek at worst is a wash with Boone/Scott.
- Rex now has a full season of starting under his belt and thus a whole lot of game film to watch in order to get better. ICLO, his mechanics look better than last year.
The only thing we don't have going for us is a tougher schedule than last year.