Image Image Image Image

RealGM Bears Preview

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,564
And1: 4,191
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

RealGM Bears Preview 

Post#1 » by CBS7 » Sun Sep 2, 2007 4:44 pm

http://www.realgmfootball.com/src_teama ... ago_bears/

Written by everyone's favorite analyst, Icness.
CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,564
And1: 4,191
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

 

Post#2 » by CBS7 » Sun Sep 2, 2007 4:51 pm

Pro Bowl RB Thomas Jones is gone

Don't you have to make the pro bowl to be called a pro bowl RB?
User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

 

Post#3 » by TylerB » Sun Sep 2, 2007 5:31 pm

lol, apparently not.
User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

 

Post#4 » by TylerB » Sun Sep 2, 2007 5:37 pm

Wow what a terrible analysis of this team.

We lose Alfonso Boone and Ian Scott while adding Dusty Dvoracek, Darwin Walker, and Anthony Adams. CLEARLY making a huge upgrade in talent and depth at the DT position and he writes,

"DT has gone from a position of strength to a major question mark. Other than Tommie Harris, this group offers little upfield punch, something critical to their Cover 2 scheme."

If you get to write these previews at least attempt some research.

It is full of countless other ignorant and idiotic comments, I'll highlite one.... "Head Coach Lovie Smith proved he is prone to unacceptable gaffes, and his stubbornness at sticking tight to his gameplan makes the Bears pretty easy to prepare for."

Where does that even come from?
Joe Jackson
Analyst
Posts: 3,694
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: Great plains - Big sky- dust bowl

 

Post#5 » by Joe Jackson » Mon Sep 3, 2007 2:12 am

How can we address a really serious objection to the authorites of RealGM about this jerk's malfeasance.
His azz needs to go because his irritating remarks were more based in ignorance than plain old bias or homerism. Just totally unqualified.
And thereby reflects on RealGm as a viable reference or reporting source.
User avatar
NoSkyy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,014
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 20, 2007

 

Post#6 » by NoSkyy » Mon Sep 3, 2007 3:26 am

DT Alphonso Boone

Hehe, typos.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#7 » by SportsWorld » Mon Sep 3, 2007 5:19 am

Joe Jackson wrote:How can we address a really serious objection to the authorites of RealGM about this jerk's malfeasance.
His azz needs to go because his irritating remarks were more based in ignorance than plain old bias or homerism. Just totally unqualified.
And thereby reflects on RealGm as a viable reference or reporting source.

Give me a break this article wasn't that bad.
I have seen worse from ESPN
User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

 

Post#8 » by TylerB » Mon Sep 3, 2007 7:15 pm

SportsWorld wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Give me a break this article wasn't that bad.


How isn't it?
User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

 

Post#9 » by Posey H8er » Mon Sep 3, 2007 7:18 pm

Who writes these articles? An actual knowledgeable fan should write these.
User avatar
Rodanlee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,523
And1: 1
Joined: May 11, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

 

Post#10 » by Rodanlee » Tue Sep 4, 2007 6:26 am

SportsWorld wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Give me a break this article wasn't that bad.
I have seen worse from ESPN


on the preview for SC on espn they just said.... "And are the Bears even the best team in their division?"

:crazy:
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#11 » by SportsWorld » Tue Sep 4, 2007 12:25 pm

^^Don't listen to ESPN. They have absolutely no respect for us. If we won the Super Bowl last year they would have called us the worst Super Bowl Champions of all time
chitownsports4ever
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 22,691
And1: 4,085
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: southside of chicago
       

 

Post#12 » by chitownsports4ever » Tue Sep 4, 2007 2:35 pm

Dont be too hard on the guy he has to write for so many teams mainly due to the lack of writers.Everyone is free to inquire about writing team previews,reviews or even weekly monday morning game recaps.Based on many of your posts I think some of you would make excellent editorial writers as well.
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#13 » by Cliff Levingston » Tue Sep 4, 2007 2:45 pm

You know he hates the Bears when he puts things like this in his dislikes:

OLB Lance Briggs held out most of the summer under the Franchise tag, and the acrimonious negotiations certainly will not help. Briggs is a pretty good player and excellent in coverage, but it remains to be seen how well he
User avatar
Jello Biafra
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,847
And1: 420
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: At a 12 step meeting near you
Contact:
         

 

Post#14 » by Jello Biafra » Tue Sep 4, 2007 2:56 pm

Let him say what he wants. Same thing with the Grossman critics. The cool thing about sports is that the Bears will either prove or disprove his analysis on the field. the only thing that worries me is that the Bears have a tough start to the season. If Grossman does not perform well, the pressure on him, and the rest of the team will be enormous.
Icness
NFL Analyst
Posts: 16,964
And1: 129
Joined: Apr 30, 2001
Location: Back in the 616
Contact:
   

 

Post#15 » by Icness » Wed Sep 5, 2007 4:46 am

I did indeed write the preview. Just a couple of general observations:

1. Lighten up folks! This team could win the division by Thanksgiving with Kyle Orton at QB, but it's not the flawless statue of David y'all believe it is. You'll feel a lot better when the inevitable adversity strikes if you temper your expectations of absolute perfection and conformity. Forgive me for being Jay Mariotti-esque and not drinking the full glass of Kool Aid. Nobody wanted to hear about how flawed the White Sox were this spring, or how the Bulls weren't as close as everyone thought either. Just don't be like Detroit people and turn on guys you worship now when they're gone or no longer meeting expectation.

2. I've spent more time in Burbonnais than any sane person would ever want to. I've seen this team up close and personal. I do know for a fact that Lovie motivated Tillman and Vasher by telling them over and over again that they were playing for the same deal. I've seen how Benson slowly won his teammates over (it's night and day from last summer), how truly bad the backups at OL, DT and LB are, the frustration the defense has when they have to not rush Rex so he can successfully complete a basic drill. You can question my opinions all you want (I welcome that--it's why we're here), but don't forget about me when I'm right either. FWIW I called for 10-6 and an early playoff loss for the Bears last year, so my relative negativity is probably overblown once again.

3. I'm not a Bears fan but I am far from a Bears hater. There's only two teams I actively root against--the Cowboys and the Ravens. I absolutely love Jerry Angelo as GM and I'm a big fan of Tommie Harris, Nate Vasher, and Des Clark.

As someone else said, we're actively seeking good writers with something to say. During the season I pretty much only do game picks for the site, so there is plenty of room for team analysis and more in-depth pieces on individual teams. I'll even help you out if you ask nicely :wink:
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#16 » by SportsWorld » Wed Sep 5, 2007 5:04 am

^^This man knows what he is talking about.
As I said, I would rather read his previews than whatever crap ESPN has.
Plus, we have to PAY for ESPN's crap.
CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,564
And1: 4,191
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

 

Post#17 » by CBS7 » Wed Sep 5, 2007 1:55 pm

It wasn't a bad article, but TJ isn't a pro bowl RB.

:lol:
User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

 

Post#18 » by TylerB » Wed Sep 5, 2007 3:34 pm

Icness wrote:I've seen how Benson slowly won his teammates over (it's night and day from last summer), how truly bad the backups at OL, DT and LB are,


We have the DEEPEST group of defensive tackles in the NFL and our Oline depth is better than average with St. Claire and Metcalf. Both who have started a lot of games in this league. St. Claire has 34 NFL starts and Metcalf has 20. They don't suck, they are actually quality backup linemen in this league whether you want to admit it or not.


You can just make things up and say all those players are terrible but it doesn't make it true. It almost seems like you watched the backup line in on offense or defense and watched them get beat, ignoring that most of those guys won't even make the team and decided all the backups must suck.

We have Darwin Walker and Anthony Adams as BACKUP defensive tackles, thats an enormous upgrade over Boone and Scott. Not a slight upgrade, an enormous upgrade. Boone did not fit the system and Scott was physically limited.

How bad can Jamar Williams be when every report out of camp described him as being a future stud?

It isn't about agreeing or disagreeing with your opinions, you claimed the possible deepest group of DTs in the NFL has no depth and you claimed an offensive line with two PROVEN veterans off the bench has no depth. Its absurd and insulting, do your homework, don't go watch training camp because you don't know what you are looking at. Research the actual players on the roster.


the frustration the defense has when they have to not rush Rex so he can successfully complete a basic drill.


Did you really even make this statement? Rex had great practice after great practice. It is common NFL, college, and HS practice not to sack the QB in drills so he can throw the ball.
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#19 » by Cliff Levingston » Wed Sep 5, 2007 4:14 pm

Icness wrote:1. Lighten up folks! This team could win the division by Thanksgiving with Kyle Orton at QB, but it's not the flawless statue of David y'all believe it is. You'll feel a lot better when the inevitable adversity strikes if you temper your expectations of absolute perfection and conformity. Forgive me for being Jay Mariotti-esque and not drinking the full glass of Kool Aid. Nobody wanted to hear about how flawed the White Sox were this spring, or how the Bulls weren't as close as everyone thought either. Just don't be like Detroit people and turn on guys you worship now when they're gone or no longer meeting expectation.

Cliff Levingston for one doesn't think the Bears will be a powerhouse of epic proportions like you hinted at with the statue reference. 11-5 playing a tough schedule would be a nice feat.

The Bulls and the Sox references are poor as well. Everyone knew the Sox wouldn't be that good after trading two of their best pitchers, it's just that no one thought they'd be as bad as they are. Same for the Bulls pretty much. We all knew they'd be good and expected them to get out of the first round, but didn't expect a whole lot more than that. No one in their right mind thought we'd win the championship.

We're talking about a team coming off a superbowl appearance as the head-and-shoulders best team in the NFC last year, and we had no significant losses unless you think TJ is much better than he is... like most people.

- Archuleta is a great pickup at SS and played stellar play under Lovie and the Cover 2 scheme, allowing Mike Brown to return to free safety where he played great for us from about 2001 - 2004.
- At the DT position, Darwin Walker is an upgrade over Tank Johnson and Adam/Dvoracek at worst is a wash with Boone/Scott.
- Rex now has a full season of starting under his belt and thus a whole lot of game film to watch in order to get better. ICLO, his mechanics look better than last year.

The only thing we don't have going for us is a tougher schedule than last year.
User avatar
Sinistar6
Starter
Posts: 2,351
And1: 132
Joined: Nov 18, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

 

Post#20 » by Sinistar6 » Thu Sep 6, 2007 9:01 pm

Some "experts" feel Walker is not an upgrade to Clink Johnson. I just hope Briggs hits players like he does guardrails.
Next time the cult's spaceship lands we'll all be wearing black Starburys.

-mcwelk

Return to Chicago Bears