Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 16, 2009
Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
Thread Self Explanatory, I think its time 2 move this guy or just cut him all together with the revalation that he needs microsugery and my be out 4 a full year. He's not making the team any better and the Rockets will never get past the 1st round depending on T-Wack.
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
- HTown_TMac
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,060
- And1: 222
- Joined: Oct 08, 2005
- Location: Houston, Texas.
-
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
..... Couldnt this have been posted in the "T-Mac might need Micro fracture Surgery" Thread?
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
- moofs
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,077
- And1: 537
- Joined: Apr 17, 2006
- Location: "if the warriors win the title this season ill tattoo their logo in my di ck" -- 000001
- Contact:
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
..... And couldnt you have spent the extra .005 seconds to spell out "2" and "4"? This is a forum, not a cell phone (on which it's still annoying, but perfectly excusable at times).
Not even going to explain (again) why we aren't cutting him as you suggest.
Not even going to explain (again) why we aren't cutting him as you suggest.
Morey 2020.
Q:How are they experts when they're always wrong?
A:Ask a stock market analyst or your financial advisor
Q:How are they experts when they're always wrong?
A:Ask a stock market analyst or your financial advisor
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
- Baller 24
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,637
- And1: 19
- Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
30 percent winning percentage.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
- grond
- Senior
- Posts: 722
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 12, 2007
- Location: Off the bandwagon, nothing but net
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
I'm assuming that's our percentage without T-Mac.
That stat has no meaning other than to link together many, many different factors into a single number. It's too broad. You can't derive any relevant info from it.
eg T-Mac's winning percentage in the playoffs = 0%
That stat has no meaning other than to link together many, many different factors into a single number. It's too broad. You can't derive any relevant info from it.
eg T-Mac's winning percentage in the playoffs = 0%
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 16, 2009
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
moofs wrote:..... And couldnt you have spent the extra .005 seconds to spell out "2" and "4"? This is a forum, not a cell phone (on which it's still annoying, but perfectly excusable at times).
Not even going to explain (again) why we aren't cutting him as you suggest.
@Moofs Oh We didn"t cut him? So I guess T-Mac is still with the team. I bet you feel stupid now don't you?
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 16, 2009
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
HTown_TMac wrote:..... Couldnt this have been posted in the "T-Mac might need Micro fracture Surgery" Thread?
I could've but you mother asked me to post it here
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
- TMU
- Forum Mod - Rockets
- Posts: 30,188
- And1: 10,413
- Joined: Jan 02, 2005
- Location: O.R.
-
Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?
No need to revive an old thread and act like an internet tough guy.