ImageImage

Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack?

Moderators: ken6199, TMU

RocketsSuckX10
Banned User
Posts: 6
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 16, 2009

Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack? 

Post#1 » by RocketsSuckX10 » Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:28 pm

Thread Self Explanatory, I think its time 2 move this guy or just cut him all together with the revalation that he needs microsugery and my be out 4 a full year. He's not making the team any better and the Rockets will never get past the 1st round depending on T-Wack.
User avatar
HTown_TMac
General Manager
Posts: 9,060
And1: 222
Joined: Oct 08, 2005
Location: Houston, Texas.
   

Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack? 

Post#2 » by HTown_TMac » Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:34 pm

..... Couldnt this have been posted in the "T-Mac might need Micro fracture Surgery" Thread?
Image
www.atrilli.net <- music blog
User avatar
moofs
General Manager
Posts: 8,077
And1: 537
Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Location: "if the warriors win the title this season ill tattoo their logo in my di ck" -- 000001
Contact:

Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack? 

Post#3 » by moofs » Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:47 pm

..... And couldnt you have spent the extra .005 seconds to spell out "2" and "4"? This is a forum, not a cell phone (on which it's still annoying, but perfectly excusable at times).

Not even going to explain (again) why we aren't cutting him as you suggest.
Morey 2020.

Q:How are they experts when they're always wrong?
A:Ask a stock market analyst or your financial advisor
User avatar
Baller 24
RealGM
Posts: 16,637
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 11, 2006

Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack? 

Post#4 » by Baller 24 » Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:01 pm

30 percent winning percentage.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
User avatar
grond
Senior
Posts: 722
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 12, 2007
Location: Off the bandwagon, nothing but net

Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack? 

Post#5 » by grond » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:51 pm

I'm assuming that's our percentage without T-Mac.

That stat has no meaning other than to link together many, many different factors into a single number. It's too broad. You can't derive any relevant info from it.

eg T-Mac's winning percentage in the playoffs = 0%
RocketsSuckX10
Banned User
Posts: 6
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 16, 2009

Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack? 

Post#6 » by RocketsSuckX10 » Fri Jul 9, 2010 6:02 pm

moofs wrote:..... And couldnt you have spent the extra .005 seconds to spell out "2" and "4"? This is a forum, not a cell phone (on which it's still annoying, but perfectly excusable at times).

Not even going to explain (again) why we aren't cutting him as you suggest.


@Moofs Oh We didn"t cut him? So I guess T-Mac is still with the team. I bet you feel stupid now don't you?
RocketsSuckX10
Banned User
Posts: 6
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 16, 2009

Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack? 

Post#7 » by RocketsSuckX10 » Fri Jul 9, 2010 6:03 pm

HTown_TMac wrote:..... Couldnt this have been posted in the "T-Mac might need Micro fracture Surgery" Thread?

I could've but you mother asked me to post it here
User avatar
TMU
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 30,188
And1: 10,413
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: O.R.
       

Re: Time 2 Cut Our Losses With T-Wack? 

Post#8 » by TMU » Fri Jul 9, 2010 6:17 pm

No need to revive an old thread and act like an internet tough guy.

Return to Houston Rockets