ImageImage

Super Bowl

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,843
And1: 42,152
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Super Bowl 

Post#21 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Feb 2, 2009 3:57 am

I just read on ESPN that the replay official didn't even ask for a review. That can't be correct. I just assumed it was quickly reviewed in the booth. How does something like that not get reviewed?
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,767
And1: 27,344
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Super Bowl 

Post#22 » by trwi7 » Mon Feb 2, 2009 6:27 am

I was listening to an interview on the radio, didn't catch who it was but it sounded like Whisenhunt and he said that they didn't review the play. That's stun, absolutely stun.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,119
And1: 55,662
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Super Bowl 

Post#23 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Feb 2, 2009 1:15 pm

They don't review in the booth. In the last 2 minutes the booth can ask for a review but the referee does all the reviews. In college ball the actual reviews are done in the booth.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,701
And1: 460
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: Super Bowl 

Post#24 » by Reddeye » Mon Feb 2, 2009 3:34 pm

User avatar
Ryan5UW
General Manager
Posts: 8,451
And1: 1,531
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Location: Madison, WI
     

Re: Super Bowl 

Post#25 » by Ryan5UW » Mon Feb 2, 2009 3:43 pm



“The replay assistant in the replay booth saw it was clearly a fumble. The ball got knocked loose and was rolling in his hand before it started forward. He has to have total control.”

It did? It looked to me like he had a very solid grip on the ball when his arm started to move forward, that's why the ball went forward too.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,119
And1: 55,662
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Super Bowl 

Post#26 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Feb 2, 2009 3:52 pm

It's not the booth officials job to make that judgement. He is to decide whether a play should be reviewed under 2 minutes. Certainly a critical play in the last two minutes of the SUPER BOWL should be reviewed just to be sure.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,701
And1: 460
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: Super Bowl 

Post#27 » by Reddeye » Mon Feb 2, 2009 4:04 pm

I thought the ball was moving before his arm came forward, but that play is so close it has to be reviewed by the official on the field. The Steelers got a 15 yard penalty on the play so if it was reversed the Cardinals would have been closer for one last shot.
User avatar
drew881
RealGM
Posts: 12,714
And1: 5,526
Joined: Aug 14, 2007

Re: Super Bowl 

Post#28 » by drew881 » Mon Feb 2, 2009 4:05 pm

This is very similar to the Patriots superbowl when a second was left on the clock. Once everyone rushes the field, its too late to get everyone back. I still think its a fumble - the ball is wobbling in warner's hand while its coming out (its not like the earlier one that was reviewed where he actually spiralled it while being hit), but I would still be pissed to not get the opportunity for replay.

Plus the cardinals would have been on the 29 yd line with that personal foul called on the play.

Return to Green Bay Packers