As much as you want other people to let go mentioning Favre, we want you to let go telling people to 'let it go' every time Favre is mentioned on the boards.
And as WAH said, we're talking about his team and his receivers. Him being brought up is about as inevitable as ever.
Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
- MikeIsGood
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,768
- And1: 11,654
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Vamos Rafa
-
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,692
- And1: 3,187
- Joined: May 29, 2009
- Location: MKE
-
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
DrugBust wrote:Percy Harvin is a WR in the same sense that Reggie Bush is a WR. He's a playmaker but I don't ever expect him to be Steve Smith.
This is exactly how I see it. I think he has incredible athleticism and he'll make some big plays, but I don't see him every developing the little things need to be an elite rec..route running, hands, reading the D, etc.
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,389
- And1: 8,012
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
Not to be "preachy", but let's keep it civil. GAD introduced me to Jake at a Fitzgibbon's post-game (he was probably too faded to remember) and he's a cool guy. You guys need to start coming out to realgm events so we can quell the venom.
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
- MikeIsGood
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,768
- And1: 11,654
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Vamos Rafa
-
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
I assume that is generally directed towards me, and I'm really not trying to get un-civil on this matter. I never take that sort of stance. But I think the point stands. As much as one side wants Favre to not be apart of any conversations on this board anymore, another side feels the right/need to bring him into conversations given all that has transpired. I really do not feel this is the thread to try to deny his inclusion in, as if it should be denied at all. It has nothing to do with the user - I have never had any problem with jake in the past, nor do I have a problem with him now, and I would think/hope that he feels the same way. But it's the truth. As much as Favre is talked about around here, there are posts criticizing every Favre mention. It is the way it has gone, and the way it will likely continue to be. But realistically, what is to be expected? He is now playing for the Packers' enemy, and this topic is regarding said team. What is to be expected on a Packers board? I would hope that if one opinion can be expressed, that the other can as well.
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,726
- And1: 8,135
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
No worries mates. Thankfully this board is nothing like the Bucks board.
Do it for Chuck
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,785
- And1: 27,354
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
jakecronus8 wrote:Thankfully this board is nothing like the Bucks board.
And what's the only difference? No WEFFPIM or jerrod. Bad influences those two.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,654
- And1: 43
- Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Re: Kevin Seifert: MIN WR Depth >>> GB WR Depth
maybe he was right...ours can't even catch