ImageImage

Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are"

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,859
And1: 42,154
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#41 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:28 pm

I think the transition to the 3-4 is going to take longer than the Packers had hoped. Or maybe they knew it would be tough this year but decided to live with it.

But I watched two teams that run the 3-4 well last night and the Packers just can't match them athletically off the edges. The Packers don't have multiple guys like Woodley, Harrison, Timmons and Dumerville. Matthews could be one of those guys. He pops out. But none of the other linebackers do.

This next offseason it would be nice to acquire a pair of tackles and another OLB. I think it would make a world of difference.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#42 » by Newz » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:33 pm

DrugBust wrote:I think the transition to the 3-4 is going to take longer than the Packers had hoped. Or maybe they knew it would be tough this year but decided to live with it.

But I watched two teams that run the 3-4 well last night and the Packers just can't match them athletically off the edges. The Packers don't have multiple guys like Woodley, Harrison, Timmons and Dumerville. Matthews could be one of those guys. He pops out. But none of the other linebackers do.

This next offseason it would be nice to acquire a pair of tackles and another OLB. I think it would make a world of difference.


We need to get rid of Kampman too.

I think he hurts a lot... Teams know that he doesn't want to cover and that he wants to rush the passer pretty much every down.

The reason why Matthews could be so good is because he has the speed and ability to rush the passer, while at the same time being able to drop back into coverage... So the offenses never really knows what to expect from that side. I'm not saying we have to get another guy as good as Matthews is at that age (because I think Matthews has been pretty damn good for a rookie), but we need to get versatile players at the LB position, IMO.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#43 » by Flames24Rulz » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:33 pm

Apparently the Gravedigger ripped McCarthy on a radio show today. I love Gilbert Brown.

I think it's very feasible to land Holmgren, Cowher, or Gruden without giving them the GM gig. Holmgren has a history with TT. I've said it like three or four times now but if TT remains the GM, Holmgren would make the most sense to me as a head coach. Shannahan seems like a guy that loves power, so I'm not so sure if he'd come along as just a head coach. Of course I don't have a problem giving him the GM gig, but I think TT will be safe after this year.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#44 » by Flames24Rulz » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:34 pm

Newz wrote:
DrugBust wrote:I think the transition to the 3-4 is going to take longer than the Packers had hoped. Or maybe they knew it would be tough this year but decided to live with it.

But I watched two teams that run the 3-4 well last night and the Packers just can't match them athletically off the edges. The Packers don't have multiple guys like Woodley, Harrison, Timmons and Dumerville. Matthews could be one of those guys. He pops out. But none of the other linebackers do.

This next offseason it would be nice to acquire a pair of tackles and another OLB. I think it would make a world of difference.


We need to get rid of Kampman too.

I think he hurts a lot... Teams know that he doesn't want to cover and that he wants to rush the passer pretty much every down.

The reason why Matthews could be so good is because he has the speed and ability to rush the passer, while at the same time being able to drop back into coverage... So the offenses never really knows what to expect from that side. I'm not saying we have to get another guy as good as Matthews is at that age (because I think Matthews has been pretty damn good for a rookie), but we need to get versatile players at the LB position, IMO.


Kampman won't be back after this year.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,859
And1: 42,154
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#45 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:36 pm

Nor should he be. He's been completely invisible unless he's getting burned in coverage. I just hope we can get something for him. My hope is a 3rd.
User avatar
Aaron It Out
General Manager
Posts: 8,804
And1: 3,101
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Location: Black Mercedes
     

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#46 » by Aaron It Out » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:45 pm

I see the Packers doing a franchise then trade deal with Kampman. I just wish he still had another year on his contract after this year so we could avoid the franchise tag and maybe get more for him.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#47 » by El Duderino » Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:21 am

DrugBust wrote:I think the transition to the 3-4 is going to take longer than the Packers had hoped. Or maybe they knew it would be tough this year but decided to live with it.

But I watched two teams that run the 3-4 well last night and the Packers just can't match them athletically off the edges. The Packers don't have multiple guys like Woodley, Harrison, Timmons and Dumerville. Matthews could be one of those guys. He pops out. But none of the other linebackers do.

This next offseason it would be nice to acquire a pair of tackles and another OLB. I think it would make a world of difference.



Yep

Fans got to caught up in scheme and not enough on the players. The 3-4 like any defense can get picked apart with not enough or right talent, just look at the Browns. We might need a MLB also that has some blitzing skills because Hawk doesn't and the team obviously doesn't trust playing Bishop. Capers love blitzing his middle backers and sending AJ is a waste of time unless he is completely unblocked because he has no ability to come close to beating a lineman or back if picked up.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,567
And1: 29,591
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#48 » by paulpressey25 » Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:39 am

Flames24Rulz wrote:if TT remains the GM, Holmgren would make the most sense to me as a head coach. .


I could live with Holmgren coming back and TT as GM. Although I think Holmgren would be more in charge given his resume. It would be like Seattle again where TT does the scouting/player personnel work and Holmgren has the final call on moves. I can't see Holmgren coming back here though. He's made more money than he knows what to do with at this point.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#49 » by El Duderino » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:41 am

Speaking of Ted, there was an article on Thompson in the JSOnline

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/69701807.html

I agree with it for the most part, but think it's a near lock that it's only a matter of when Rodgers makes a Pro Bowl and i think fairly soon Finley will make it also if he stays healthy. One part in it fits most about how i feel about Thompson


Since Thompson was hired in January 2005 as the general manager, his philosophy has been to build a winning organization through the draft and by resigning his own players.

For the most part, Thompson has stayed in the shallow end of the pool when it comes to free agency and trades.

That philosophy certainly can work if your drafts are among football's finest year in and year out. But a major reason the Packers are 4-4 this season and just 35-37 during Thompson's tenure is his drafting has been nothing more than mediocre.

Thompson has conducted Green Bay's last five drafts, and here are the results:

• Thompson has selected 51 players.

• Thirty four of Thompson's picks are still either on the roster or the practice squad (66.7%)

• Ten of Thompson's picks are currently starters (19.1%).

• And as Collins stated, he's the only Thompson draft pick to have played in a Pro Bowl (2.0%).

Compared to some other general managers around the league, Thompson's draft record isn't bad. The problem is, it isn't special either.

And considering Thompson's apathy toward free agency and trades, he needs to hit home runs in the draft.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,595
And1: 4,452
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#50 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:16 am

Not to mention, Jennings has a pro bowl caliber year and wasn't rewarded either.

That year, Driver was. Who deserves any accolade he gets, but Jennings' had the better numbers if memory serves me correctly.
User avatar
notoriousTJ11
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,362
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 08, 2003
Location: Morrison Hotel

Re: Murphy: "I'm disappointed about where we are" 

Post#51 » by notoriousTJ11 » Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:06 pm

By the end of his fifth year on the job, Wolf had been to the playoffs four times, won a Super Bowl and played in two NFC Championship Games. Right now, Thompson has one playoff appearance in four seasons and faces long odds to reach the postseason this year.


Wolf wasn't perfect (re-signing freeman for that ridiculous contract as one example or the John Michaels pick) but it all comes down to wins and loses.

Return to Green Bay Packers