James Jones' comments
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: James Jones' comments
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,605
- And1: 4,456
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: James Jones' comments
Well, Jones' fumbles have been more "key" but Nelson has had a ton...especially early in games.
Re: James Jones' comments
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: James Jones' comments
ClassicJack wrote:DrugBust wrote:Also, +1 to the Swain appreciation. He's better than a #5 and I have no doubts he could be a #3 if needed.
Wow really? What has he done to make you believe he can be a 3? I feel like I've missed something. He hasn't even been as good as Ruvell Martin was in his tenure here and he's barely still in the league.
Yeah I don't get the Swain love, he's done absolutely nothing. The Swain love combined with everyone's preference for Nelson over Jones makes me think there is some kind of love affair with white wide receivers on this board. I don't understand it.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: James Jones' comments
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,885
- And1: 41,262
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: James Jones' comments
Has anybody actually said they prefer Nelson over Jones? Nelson is not a free agent. Jones is.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: James Jones' comments
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,729
- And1: 8,138
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: James Jones' comments
I see Nelson and Jones roughly the same. They are just above average receivers. I am not interested in paying either one starter money.
Do it for Chuck
Re: James Jones' comments
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: James Jones' comments
jakecronus8 wrote:I see Nelson and Jones roughly the same. They are just above average receivers. I am not interested in paying either one starter money.
Same. I wouldn't mind having either of them on our team, so long as they only get paid like what they are... Number 3 WRs.
Re: James Jones' comments
- Wise1
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,261
- And1: 256
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
- Location: Devouring worlds.
-
Re: James Jones' comments
I have both Jones and Nelson slotted as career 3rd and 4th receivers on championship level teams. I'm hoping the Packers can snag Titus Young at the end of round 1. I'm in the let Jones walk if he demands too much money camp. Ditch Barnett, let Jenkins (age) walk and bring back Namdi Asomougha....a masterstroke if TT can make it happen. Woodson at ss eases the need for another dominant OLB. Play chessmaster TT. Get yourself a lockdown secondary and then plug in some big guys that are stout against the run.
Re: James Jones' comments
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,807
- And1: 27,383
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: James Jones' comments
Wise1 wrote:I have both Jones and Nelson slotted as career 3rd and 4th receivers on championship level teams.
Weren't they pretty much the 2nd and 3rd receivers on a championship team this year? I know Driver was the starter but he had only one more catch than Jones and 6 more than Nelson, less yards than both, worse YPC obviously and Jones had more TD's and Nelson had two less TD's.
I wouldn't put the current Driver much above Nelson and Jones, if he's above them at all.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.