ImageImage

James Jones' comments

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,605
And1: 4,456
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: James Jones' comments 

Post#121 » by Kerb Hohl » Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:54 am

Well, Jones' fumbles have been more "key" but Nelson has had a ton...especially early in games.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: James Jones' comments 

Post#122 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:08 pm

ClassicJack wrote:
DrugBust wrote:Also, +1 to the Swain appreciation. He's better than a #5 and I have no doubts he could be a #3 if needed.


Wow really? What has he done to make you believe he can be a 3? I feel like I've missed something. He hasn't even been as good as Ruvell Martin was in his tenure here and he's barely still in the league.


Yeah I don't get the Swain love, he's done absolutely nothing. The Swain love combined with everyone's preference for Nelson over Jones makes me think there is some kind of love affair with white wide receivers on this board. I don't understand it.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,886
And1: 41,262
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: James Jones' comments 

Post#123 » by emunney » Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:26 pm

Has anybody actually said they prefer Nelson over Jones? Nelson is not a free agent. Jones is.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,729
And1: 8,138
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: James Jones' comments 

Post#124 » by jakecronus8 » Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:29 pm

I see Nelson and Jones roughly the same. They are just above average receivers. I am not interested in paying either one starter money.
Do it for Chuck
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: James Jones' comments 

Post#125 » by Newz » Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:32 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:I see Nelson and Jones roughly the same. They are just above average receivers. I am not interested in paying either one starter money.


Same. I wouldn't mind having either of them on our team, so long as they only get paid like what they are... Number 3 WRs.
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,261
And1: 256
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.
     

Re: James Jones' comments 

Post#126 » by Wise1 » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:25 pm

I have both Jones and Nelson slotted as career 3rd and 4th receivers on championship level teams. I'm hoping the Packers can snag Titus Young at the end of round 1. I'm in the let Jones walk if he demands too much money camp. Ditch Barnett, let Jenkins (age) walk and bring back Namdi Asomougha....a masterstroke if TT can make it happen. Woodson at ss eases the need for another dominant OLB. Play chessmaster TT. Get yourself a lockdown secondary and then plug in some big guys that are stout against the run.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,807
And1: 27,383
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: James Jones' comments 

Post#127 » by trwi7 » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:17 pm

Wise1 wrote:I have both Jones and Nelson slotted as career 3rd and 4th receivers on championship level teams.


Weren't they pretty much the 2nd and 3rd receivers on a championship team this year? I know Driver was the starter but he had only one more catch than Jones and 6 more than Nelson, less yards than both, worse YPC obviously and Jones had more TD's and Nelson had two less TD's.

I wouldn't put the current Driver much above Nelson and Jones, if he's above them at all.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Green Bay Packers