ImageImage

Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,599
And1: 4,452
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions 

Post#21 » by Kerb Hohl » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:48 am

To summarize the post before:

Tebow beat, by no more than a score in almost any of these games except 1:
Cassel (he threw for 93 yards)
Palmer (he threw a few pick 6's)
Rookie Ponder with no Adrian Peterson
Matt Moore
Rivers/Chargers
Mark Sanchez
Caleb Hanie

The combined records of teams he beat was 48-62. If you take out the fact that the Bears were 7-3 with Jay Cutler, he beat a combined 41-59 group. He won those games by 37 points. Outside of the Oakland game where Palmer threw them several pick 6's, they didn't win a game by more than 4 points. Finally, several of those teams Tebow beat were 8-8...and the only reason they were 8-8 or 7-9 is that they all just beat up on each other in the horrible AFC West and the non-Patriot AFC East.

The Broncos were a bottom 5 NFL team last year, bottom 10 at best. They just got an incredible schedule/luck.

Peyton has this team top 5 in the NFL, top 10 if you want to say they've been aided by THIS year's schedule.

I'm not even arguing for Manning but that Tebow argument is bad. They basically played the 7 of the worst teams in the NFL to a draw and lucked out at the end, all while losing the other 4 Tebow played.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,864
And1: 42,162
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions 

Post#22 » by ReasonablySober » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:20 am

I've said as much, but didn't go as in depth. The Broncos were a bad team. With Manning they're top five.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions 

Post#23 » by Newz » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:30 am

The Broncos would be a good team with a lot of QBs though, IMO. I think people underrate the talent around Manning.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,788
And1: 27,357
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions 

Post#24 » by trwi7 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:44 am

GrendonJennings wrote:To summarize the post before:

Tebow beat, by no more than a score in almost any of these games except 1:
Cassel (he threw for 93 yards)
Palmer (he threw a few pick 6's)
Rookie Ponder with no Adrian Peterson
Matt Moore
Rivers/Chargers
Mark Sanchez
Caleb Hanie

The combined records of teams he beat was 48-62. If you take out the fact that the Bears were 7-3 with Jay Cutler, he beat a combined 41-59 group. He won those games by 37 points. Outside of the Oakland game where Palmer threw them several pick 6's, they didn't win a game by more than 4 points. Finally, several of those teams Tebow beat were 8-8...and the only reason they were 8-8 or 7-9 is that they all just beat up on each other in the horrible AFC West and the non-Patriot AFC East.

The Broncos were a bottom 5 NFL team last year, bottom 10 at best. They just got an incredible schedule/luck.

Peyton has this team top 5 in the NFL, top 10 if you want to say they've been aided by THIS year's schedule.

I'm not even arguing for Manning but that Tebow argument is bad. They basically played the 7 of the worst teams in the NFL to a draw and lucked out at the end, all while losing the other 4 Tebow played.


Weak argument. He just played who was on his schedule.

/Icness and others on the general board
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Green Bay Packers