To summarize the post before:
Tebow beat, by no more than a score in almost any of these games except 1:
Cassel (he threw for 93 yards)
Palmer (he threw a few pick 6's)
Rookie Ponder with no Adrian Peterson
Matt Moore
Rivers/Chargers
Mark Sanchez
Caleb Hanie
The combined records of teams he beat was 48-62. If you take out the fact that the Bears were 7-3 with Jay Cutler, he beat a combined 41-59 group. He won those games by 37 points. Outside of the Oakland game where Palmer threw them several pick 6's, they didn't win a game by more than 4 points. Finally, several of those teams Tebow beat were 8-8...and the only reason they were 8-8 or 7-9 is that they all just beat up on each other in the horrible AFC West and the non-Patriot AFC East.
The Broncos were a bottom 5 NFL team last year, bottom 10 at best. They just got an incredible schedule/luck.
Peyton has this team top 5 in the NFL, top 10 if you want to say they've been aided by THIS year's schedule.
I'm not even arguing for Manning but that Tebow argument is bad. They basically played the 7 of the worst teams in the NFL to a draw and lucked out at the end, all while losing the other 4 Tebow played.
Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,599
- And1: 4,452
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 107,864
- And1: 42,162
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions
I've said as much, but didn't go as in depth. The Broncos were a bad team. With Manning they're top five.
Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions
The Broncos would be a good team with a lot of QBs though, IMO. I think people underrate the talent around Manning.
Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,796
- And1: 27,366
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Packer Pro Bowl / other Predictions
GrendonJennings wrote:To summarize the post before:
Tebow beat, by no more than a score in almost any of these games except 1:
Cassel (he threw for 93 yards)
Palmer (he threw a few pick 6's)
Rookie Ponder with no Adrian Peterson
Matt Moore
Rivers/Chargers
Mark Sanchez
Caleb Hanie
The combined records of teams he beat was 48-62. If you take out the fact that the Bears were 7-3 with Jay Cutler, he beat a combined 41-59 group. He won those games by 37 points. Outside of the Oakland game where Palmer threw them several pick 6's, they didn't win a game by more than 4 points. Finally, several of those teams Tebow beat were 8-8...and the only reason they were 8-8 or 7-9 is that they all just beat up on each other in the horrible AFC West and the non-Patriot AFC East.
The Broncos were a bottom 5 NFL team last year, bottom 10 at best. They just got an incredible schedule/luck.
Peyton has this team top 5 in the NFL, top 10 if you want to say they've been aided by THIS year's schedule.
I'm not even arguing for Manning but that Tebow argument is bad. They basically played the 7 of the worst teams in the NFL to a draw and lucked out at the end, all while losing the other 4 Tebow played.
Weak argument. He just played who was on his schedule.
/Icness and others on the general board
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.