ImageImage

Week 8: Non-Packers

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,631
And1: 4,466
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#161 » by Kerb Hohl » Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:32 pm

Spankerson -- first career catch.
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#162 » by chuckleslove » Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:42 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Joe flacco is 30-50 for 300 yds. Trying to compute in my head the numbers Arodge would have if he was allowed to throw 50 times in a game.


Probably something like 40-50 for 550 yards and 7 TDs 0 INT
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#163 » by Newz » Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:42 pm

This QB draft class looks like it is going to turn out to be pretty damn good.

Cam, Ponder and Dalton all look like they have a chance to be above average NFL QBs. (Cam already is, IMO) Plus you have guys like Locker who haven't really got on the field yet.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,934
And1: 27,512
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#164 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:44 pm

chuckleslove wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Joe flacco is 30-50 for 300 yds. Trying to compute in my head the numbers Arodge would have if he was allowed to throw 50 times in a game.


Probably something like 40-50 for 550 yards and 7 TDs 0 INT


Only 7 TDs?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
SheedsWeed
RealGM
Posts: 12,931
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
Contact:

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#165 » by SheedsWeed » Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:44 pm

Reggie Bush only had his second career 100+ rushing game today? Huh.
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,637
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#166 » by Greatness » Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:46 pm

SheedsWeed wrote:Reggie Bush only had his second career 100+ rushing game today? Huh.

Surprising thing to me is that he's had one before
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,166
And1: 15,034
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#167 » by Ayt » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:08 pm

Tebow is unbelievably bad.
User avatar
MadCityBucky
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#168 » by MadCityBucky » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:13 pm

The niners defense is sick. That was an unbelievable catch by Scheffler
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,735
And1: 8,144
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#169 » by jakecronus8 » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:16 pm

Newz wrote:This QB draft class looks like it is going to turn out to be pretty damn good.

Cam, Ponder and Dalton all look like they have a chance to be above average NFL QBs. (Cam already is, IMO) Plus you have guys like Locker who haven't really got on the field yet.


Agree. I think overall this past draft will be better for quarterbacks (Cam, dalton, ponder, mallett, locker) then the all hype qb's coming up in the next one (Luck, Barkley, jones, rg3)

Side note. Cam is filthy good. His ceiling is best player in the NFL.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,631
And1: 4,466
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#170 » by Kerb Hohl » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:26 pm

I like Dalton, but he could still end up being Kyle Orton (not bad at all, just nothing flashy). Cam is really good. Ponder looks decent, we'll see.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#171 » by El Duderino » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:33 pm

Newz wrote:This QB draft class looks like it is going to turn out to be pretty damn good.

Cam, Ponder and Dalton all look like they have a chance to be above average NFL QBs. (Cam already is, IMO) Plus you have guys like Locker who haven't really got on the field yet.


It will be interesting to how Locker and Ponder turn out going forward because during the draft multiple people said that Minnesota wanted Locker and were bummed when he didn't slip to them, but decided to still take Ponder.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,495
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#172 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:33 pm

LOL at the Denver Tebows.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,166
And1: 15,034
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#173 » by Ayt » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:35 pm

Tomorrow I'm gonna dress up like Tim Tebow and throw candy 50 feet over kids' heads .
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,934
And1: 27,512
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#174 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:36 pm

Ayt wrote:Tomorrow I'm gonna dress up like Tim Tebow and throw candy 50 feet over kids' heads .


Then get down on a knee and pray to Jebus and thank him that he gave you the strength to throw it 50 feet over their heads.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,631
And1: 4,466
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#175 » by Kerb Hohl » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:51 pm

I told a friend of mine that this was going to be another 17 carry, 29 yard day for Torain.

How they keep giving a scrub like him the ball over Helu who at least has some explosiveness confuses me.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,631
And1: 4,466
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#176 » by Kerb Hohl » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:58 pm

Calling a Tebow comeback here. How many screens will he need to complete to get back in it is the only question.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#177 » by Newz » Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:13 pm

Teebs is a disaster.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,934
And1: 27,512
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#178 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:16 pm

Newz wrote:Teebs is a disaster.


You are dissing Tebow!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBHzt6wRjYc[/youtube]
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,138
And1: 8,859
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#179 » by LikeABosh » Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:28 pm

New England's D looks terrible.

"Numbers don't tell the whole story" - **** that, they're terrible
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,631
And1: 4,466
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#180 » by Kerb Hohl » Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:29 pm

I don't know too many people that think the Pats D is very good.

Return to Green Bay Packers