Week 8: Non-Packers
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,631
- And1: 4,466
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Spankerson -- first career catch.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
jakecronus8 wrote:Joe flacco is 30-50 for 300 yds. Trying to compute in my head the numbers Arodge would have if he was allowed to throw 50 times in a game.
Probably something like 40-50 for 550 yards and 7 TDs 0 INT
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
This QB draft class looks like it is going to turn out to be pretty damn good.
Cam, Ponder and Dalton all look like they have a chance to be above average NFL QBs. (Cam already is, IMO) Plus you have guys like Locker who haven't really got on the field yet.
Cam, Ponder and Dalton all look like they have a chance to be above average NFL QBs. (Cam already is, IMO) Plus you have guys like Locker who haven't really got on the field yet.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,934
- And1: 27,512
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
chuckleslove wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:Joe flacco is 30-50 for 300 yds. Trying to compute in my head the numbers Arodge would have if he was allowed to throw 50 times in a game.
Probably something like 40-50 for 550 yards and 7 TDs 0 INT
Only 7 TDs?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- SheedsWeed
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,931
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
- Contact:
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Reggie Bush only had his second career 100+ rushing game today? Huh.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,638
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
SheedsWeed wrote:Reggie Bush only had his second career 100+ rushing game today? Huh.
Surprising thing to me is that he's had one before
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,166
- And1: 15,034
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Tebow is unbelievably bad.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- MadCityBucky
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,873
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
The niners defense is sick. That was an unbelievable catch by Scheffler
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,738
- And1: 8,150
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Newz wrote:This QB draft class looks like it is going to turn out to be pretty damn good.
Cam, Ponder and Dalton all look like they have a chance to be above average NFL QBs. (Cam already is, IMO) Plus you have guys like Locker who haven't really got on the field yet.
Agree. I think overall this past draft will be better for quarterbacks (Cam, dalton, ponder, mallett, locker) then the all hype qb's coming up in the next one (Luck, Barkley, jones, rg3)
Side note. Cam is filthy good. His ceiling is best player in the NFL.
Do it for Chuck
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,631
- And1: 4,466
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
I like Dalton, but he could still end up being Kyle Orton (not bad at all, just nothing flashy). Cam is really good. Ponder looks decent, we'll see.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Newz wrote:This QB draft class looks like it is going to turn out to be pretty damn good.
Cam, Ponder and Dalton all look like they have a chance to be above average NFL QBs. (Cam already is, IMO) Plus you have guys like Locker who haven't really got on the field yet.
It will be interesting to how Locker and Ponder turn out going forward because during the draft multiple people said that Minnesota wanted Locker and were bummed when he didn't slip to them, but decided to still take Ponder.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Turk Nowitzki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,495
- And1: 11,521
- Joined: Feb 26, 2010
- Location: on the Hellmouth
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,166
- And1: 15,034
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Tomorrow I'm gonna dress up like Tim Tebow and throw candy 50 feet over kids' heads .
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,934
- And1: 27,512
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Ayt wrote:Tomorrow I'm gonna dress up like Tim Tebow and throw candy 50 feet over kids' heads .
Then get down on a knee and pray to Jebus and thank him that he gave you the strength to throw it 50 feet over their heads.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,631
- And1: 4,466
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
I told a friend of mine that this was going to be another 17 carry, 29 yard day for Torain.
How they keep giving a scrub like him the ball over Helu who at least has some explosiveness confuses me.
How they keep giving a scrub like him the ball over Helu who at least has some explosiveness confuses me.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,631
- And1: 4,466
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Calling a Tebow comeback here. How many screens will he need to complete to get back in it is the only question.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Teebs is a disaster.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,934
- And1: 27,512
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Newz wrote:Teebs is a disaster.
You are dissing Tebow!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBHzt6wRjYc[/youtube]
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- LikeABosh
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,138
- And1: 8,859
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
New England's D looks terrible.
"Numbers don't tell the whole story" - **** that, they're terrible
"Numbers don't tell the whole story" - **** that, they're terrible
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,631
- And1: 4,466
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
I don't know too many people that think the Pats D is very good.