ImageImage

Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Packers Talking Extension with Aaron Jones

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,833
And1: 1,944
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread 

Post#161 » by Treebeard » Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:37 pm

Matches Malone wrote:
Read on Twitter


I was good with them retaining Pettine going into last season, but the inability to adapt to defending the run this year was a system problem. That, and they sometimes seemed to struggle with general in-game adaptations.

Did Pettine sell La Fluer, Gute, and Murphy on their struggles being largely personnel based?
*******************************************************
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,740
And1: 29,571
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#162 » by Ron Swanson » Wed Jan 22, 2020 10:57 pm

Fine with retaining Pettine for the same reason I was fine retaining Capers after the 2009 season. It was an embarrassing performance against an opposing offense, but all in all, it was still just one game. The defense has made strides each of the last two years and you have to look at the whole picture. That being said, Pettine has zero excuses to not field a Top-10 or 15 unit next season. Plenty of high picks and big money free agent signings have been invested on that side of the ball. He's firmly on the hot seat otherwise.
User avatar
ibanezjp
Senior
Posts: 658
And1: 288
Joined: Mar 16, 2010
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#163 » by ibanezjp » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:17 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Fine with retaining Pettine for the same reason I was fine retaining Capers after the 2009 season. It was an embarrassing performance against an opposing offense, but all in all, it was still just one game. The defense has made strides each of the last two years and you have to look at the whole picture. That being said, Pettine has zero excuses to not field a Top-10 or 15 unit next season. Plenty of high picks and big money free agent signings have been invested on that side of the ball. He's firmly on the hot seat otherwise.


Yeah, safe move for locker room culture and continuity’s sake to keep him. I thought overall he did a really good job this year but man that 49ers game was a fireable offense in my opinion. I didn’t think capers had to go after 2009, that was just a really good performance by a HOF QB in Warner that day. 2012 against Kaep was when he should’ve gone as that game he got caught with his pants down. I would’ve taken a swing at someone else since we only have a short window with Rodgers anyway but it seems like no team besides the 49ers could’ve exposed us like that. Maybe Tennessee, but so many teams want to pass the ball and that was a strength of ours and Petine’s plan of limiting big plays and letting them move up and down the field slowly but not score got us to 13-3. I think Shanahan at least offensively is thinking on another level right now. Almost Belichick like in the advantage he gives his team.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,974
And1: 16,655
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#164 » by humanrefutation » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:34 pm

I would have fired Pettine. He made virtually no adjustments against the 49ers until the game was totally out of hand. Some of it invoked his lack of credible ILBs, some of it was on the players themselves. But dude was basically running out 1 DL looks against a defense that just ran down his throat in unprecedented fashion. Something like 150 yards were gained before contact. That's absurd. And that isn't something entirely new and unexpected, like when Kaep destroyed us on the read-option. It was just run the **** over - a flashback to the same issue that plagued our defense earlier in the year.

Coupled with the fact that MLF wasn't able to choose his own guy when he started here - something generally afforded to new head coaches - would have tipped me towards showing him the door.
User avatar
ibanezjp
Senior
Posts: 658
And1: 288
Joined: Mar 16, 2010
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#165 » by ibanezjp » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:35 pm

Read on Twitter


This is really sad to watch how frustrated he sounds. I know it’s on him ultimately it that was the same feeling I had during the game. Concerning for the future if he can’t get his guys motivated on the door step of a super bowl. Like someone else said here, the further we get away from this the more this is becoming a huge missed opportunity. This is quickly ranking higher and higher on the list of NFCCG losses. My list is probably something like

2014 (obviously the worst)
2019
2007
1995
2016

The 2016 team just didn’t belong and I never feel bad about losing that game. 95 we could’ve beat the Steelers but we couldn’t get past cowboys for third straight year. Very infuriating but probably loses its sting since we won the next year. 2019 I think is now worse than 2007 for the fact that we’d have a much better shot at beating the chiefs than the 07 team had at beating the perfect Pats.
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,833
And1: 1,944
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#166 » by Treebeard » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:39 pm

It wouldn't have broken my heart for Pettine to be dropped. Having said that, who would have been the most likely available candidates? That's a moot point now, of course.
*******************************************************
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,733
And1: 15,247
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#167 » by rilamann » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:41 pm

Gute losses some credibility as a GM for bringing Pettine back. Pettine is mediocre at best and after last Sunday, I don't see how you bring him back if you're serious about getting to a Super Bowl. Pettine is not championship level, and it's pretty obvious.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,172
And1: 9,769
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#168 » by crkone » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:04 am

humanrefutation wrote:I would have fired Pettine. He made virtually no adjustments against the 49ers until the game was totally out of hand. Some of it invoked his lack of credible ILBs, some of it was on the players themselves. But dude was basically running out 1 DL looks against a defense that just ran down his throat in unprecedented fashion. Something like 150 yards were gained before contact. That's absurd. And that isn't something entirely new and unexpected, like when Kaep destroyed us on the read-option. It was just run the **** over - a flashback to the same issue that plagued our defense earlier in the year.

Coupled with the fact that MLF wasn't able to choose his own guy when he started here - something generally afforded to new head coaches - would have tipped me towards showing him the door.


Yeah I generally don't like to make rash decisions but I thought Pettine needed to go. His entire game plan and the non-intensity of the defense was unacceptable.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,658
And1: 55,951
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#169 » by MickeyDavis » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:07 am

rilamann wrote:Gute losses some credibility as a GM for bringing Pettine back. Pettine is mediocre at best and after last Sunday, I don't see how you bring him back if you're serious about getting to a Super Bowl. Pettine is not championship level, and it's pretty obvious.

Gute doesn't decide on staff. Murphy does. Maybe Murphy gave MLF final authority on staff (I doubt it) but both MLF and Gute report directly to Murphy.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
ibanezjp
Senior
Posts: 658
And1: 288
Joined: Mar 16, 2010
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#170 » by ibanezjp » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:08 am

rilamann wrote:Gute losses some credibility as a GM for bringing Pettine back. Pettine is mediocre at best and after last Sunday, I don't see how you bring him back if you're serious about getting to a Super Bowl. Pettine is not championship level, and it's pretty obvious.


I don’t know, PFF had us as the 8th best defense overall. If the offense is just a little better I think 8th is definitely good enough to win the owl. I’m just thinking more and more that SF is just a really horrible matchup for us. I mean we dominated seattle and they beat SF once and almost twice.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,711
And1: 4,316
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#171 » by BUCKnation » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:54 am

I'm mostly fine with keeping pettine, but he got worked by Shanahan, who seems to know his stuff inside and out, which could pose problems if they remain a contender next year and that seems like a given.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,733
And1: 15,247
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#172 » by rilamann » Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:39 am

MickeyDavis wrote:
rilamann wrote:Gute losses some credibility as a GM for bringing Pettine back. Pettine is mediocre at best and after last Sunday, I don't see how you bring him back if you're serious about getting to a Super Bowl. Pettine is not championship level, and it's pretty obvious.

Gute doesn't decide on staff. Murphy does. Maybe Murphy gave MLF final authority on staff (I doubt it) but both MLF and Gute report directly to Murphy.

Yeah, you're right, I always forget about that. I make the mistake of assuming the GM actually gets to be the GM. Having followed the Bucks during the Herb Kohl years, I should know better than to always assume that..lol.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,733
And1: 15,247
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#173 » by rilamann » Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:41 am

ibanezjp wrote:
rilamann wrote:Gute losses some credibility as a GM for bringing Pettine back. Pettine is mediocre at best and after last Sunday, I don't see how you bring him back if you're serious about getting to a Super Bowl. Pettine is not championship level, and it's pretty obvious.


I don’t know, PFF had us as the 8th best defense overall. If the offense is just a little better I think 8th is definitely good enough to win the owl. I’m just thinking more and more that SF is just a really horrible matchup for us. I mean we dominated seattle and they beat SF once and almost twice.

Pettine is mediocre, I think you could do worse than Pettiine at D coordinator. However I think if you want to win a Super Bowl you'll have to do better than Pettine.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,645
And1: 13,758
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#174 » by th87 » Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:10 am

Looking forward to Shanahan running circles around Pettine for years to come.
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,645
And1: 13,758
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#175 » by th87 » Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:17 am

ibanezjp wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is really sad to watch how frustrated he sounds. I know it’s on him ultimately it that was the same feeling I had during the game. Concerning for the future if he can’t get his guys motivated on the door step of a super bowl. Like someone else said here, the further we get away from this the more this is becoming a huge missed opportunity. This is quickly ranking higher and higher on the list of NFCCG losses. My list is probably something like

2014 (obviously the worst)
2019
2007
1995
2016

The 2016 team just didn’t belong and I never feel bad about losing that game. 95 we could’ve beat the Steelers but we couldn’t get past cowboys for third straight year. Very infuriating but probably loses its sting since we won the next year. 2019 I think is now worse than 2007 for the fact that we’d have a much better shot at beating the chiefs than the 07 team had at beating the perfect Pats.


Exactly my sentiment. We didn't go down swinging.

We inexplicably stuck with a tactical error until it killed us, and the person in charge of it will remain. And it's not like we'll avoid SF in the future either; Shanahan will have plenty of opportunities to be one step ahead of us.
User avatar
Frank Nova
Head Coach
Posts: 7,368
And1: 3,552
Joined: Jul 04, 2008
Location: Shootin’ dice with Larry Bird in Barcelona
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#176 » by Frank Nova » Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:19 am

rilamann wrote:Gute losses some credibility as a GM for bringing Pettine back. Pettine is mediocre at best and after last Sunday, I don't see how you bring him back if you're serious about getting to a Super Bowl. Pettine is not championship level, and it's pretty obvious.
Player effort was the scapegoat that saved Pettines job. When the impact players aren't making any impact its just all finger pointing and Pettine seems like the type of guy that could sell the idea that the players didnt execute moreso than the gameplan blew donkey dicks. Pettine couldve wouldve and shouldve been fired monday morning, its really a **** joke he wasn't. And he's back for year 2 (3) so I guess we have to see how BG drafts and spends now before making anymore criticisms.

Sent from my SM-N950U using RealGM mobile app
RIP Kobe Forever. GOAT 8-24. Long Live Giannis
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,973
And1: 5,026
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#177 » by RRyder823 » Thu Jan 23, 2020 3:23 am

rilamann wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:
rilamann wrote:Gute losses some credibility as a GM for bringing Pettine back. Pettine is mediocre at best and after last Sunday, I don't see how you bring him back if you're serious about getting to a Super Bowl. Pettine is not championship level, and it's pretty obvious.

Gute doesn't decide on staff. Murphy does. Maybe Murphy gave MLF final authority on staff (I doubt it) but both MLF and Gute report directly to Murphy.

Yeah, you're right, I always forget about that. I make the mistake of assuming the GM actually gets to be the GM. Having followed the Bucks during the Herb Kohl years, I should know better than to always assume that..lol.
Even in a normal setting it still isnt the GM that decides the coaching staff

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,496
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread 

Post#178 » by DrWood » Thu Jan 23, 2020 3:27 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:If you want to blame Rodgers for aging - so be it. He's the same age as Favre was for the infamous Giants playoff game. But I think it's unfair to expect the same production we've seen in the past with fewer weapons than he's had in a decade, all while aging. Give him some help or build a Top 5 defense. Blaming him is easy - and stupid.


Favre was actually two years older than A-Rod for the January 2008 Giants NFC title game. And Favre by that point had a lot more miles and hits on him, as A-Rod really didn't start as full time QB until age 25.

Think there is nuance to the A-Rod discussion. I don't blame him for yesterday. But at the same time, to win we need him to be prime A-Rod. He's not that anymore and hasn't been for the last two years. And that's not coming back.

Sure, he's still capable of having great games every now and then. But this team is going to have to live with him in the game manager QB role, while getting more playmakers on the team.

There was one reason why the Packers lost--they kept missing tackles. Anything else is insignificant.

edit: OK, the turnovers were somewhat significant.
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,516
And1: 2,303
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#179 » by stillgotgame » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:04 pm

Why is the blame for the defensive ineptitude only on Pet? Isn’t LaFluer his boss? He’s gotta be more proactive if something isn’t working. Pettine ran the scheme, it didn’t work, but LaFluer did nothing that I could see.

I really like the structure of the 49ers front office. Coach is the boss of the GM. The real football guy makes the decisions, not some staff guy. Love it. Shanahan has a lot of power and has done a fantastic job. They’re a very complete team.
Bucks in 6
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Adams, Clark, and ZDS named to Pro Bowl 

Post#180 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:14 pm

Honestly you can't blame that horrific game on any one person. Top down everyone sucked and was responsible.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.

Return to Green Bay Packers