ImageImage

Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,203
And1: 9,787
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#721 » by crkone » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:50 am

Ends on a PI. Fitting.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#722 » by Jollay » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:50 am

What we cant challenge just for the helluva it that there was pass interference?
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,556
And1: 8,130
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#723 » by Mags FTW » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:50 am

He was on MVS' back, but whatever
TroyD92
RealGM
Posts: 23,724
And1: 11,375
Joined: Mar 28, 2013
Location: Renewed Hope
 

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#724 » by TroyD92 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:50 am

Isn’t that pass interference
VooDoo7 wrote:
JEIS wrote:

Kidd would have curb stomped him.

Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.


Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
User avatar
Magic Giannison
RealGM
Posts: 27,848
And1: 27,302
Joined: Aug 08, 2014
   

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#725 » by Magic Giannison » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:50 am

Sorry guys it seems i was bad luck ...
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,116
And1: 41,634
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#726 » by emunney » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:51 am

Jesus Christ that was an unbelievably rough ending to a game from all angles.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,591
And1: 1,778
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#727 » by MoMM » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:51 am

OH GOD!

So basically we had 2 TDs to score in the 3-yard line or less and couldn't make any of them.

Congrats! We deserved to lose it.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,448
And1: 42,632
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#728 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:51 am

That was the most unwatchable **** of a game I've ever seen.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,166
And1: 27,780
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#729 » by trwi7 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:52 am

Magic Giannison wrote:Sorry guys it seems i was bad luck ...


I blame Embiid.

Read on Twitter
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,512
And1: 7,063
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#730 » by XtremeDunkz » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:52 am

**** game with Dallas next.
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
ACGB
RealGM
Posts: 10,757
And1: 2,877
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: 414
 

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#731 » by ACGB » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:53 am

This isn't sour grapes. Once the Packers are bad I have no interest in this. It's an awful game that makes no sense.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,379
And1: 17,245
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#732 » by JayMKE » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:53 am

Blew it, just infuriating game all around.
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,116
And1: 41,634
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#733 » by emunney » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:53 am

Lazard is still #1.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
TJ_Ford_11
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,257
And1: 967
Joined: Nov 09, 2005
Location: Hawaii
         

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#734 » by TJ_Ford_11 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:53 am

trwi7 wrote:
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.


But there was over a quarter to play still. You never know what’s going to happen the rest of the game. Too much time left to go for two


A two possession lead is always better than a one possession lead no matter the time especially with no risk of trailing if the opponent scores a touchdown.



Go for two in the first quarter if it creates a two possession game?
Image
User avatar
dedned
Analyst
Posts: 3,737
And1: 1,480
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: nowhere
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#735 » by dedned » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:53 am

TroyD92 wrote:Isn’t that pass interference

Yes. The rules suck cause that can't be challenged. Tho it was a turnover sonit should get looked at. Tho maybe they don't care about pi then. Kinda F'y. Think that would be the play you would have reviewable pi for. But wtf do I know.
Image
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,166
And1: 27,780
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#736 » by trwi7 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:53 am

TJ_Ford_11 wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:
But there was over a quarter to play still. You never know what’s going to happen the rest of the game. Too much time left to go for two


A two possession lead is always better than a one possession lead no matter the time especially with no risk of trailing if the opponent scores a touchdown.



Go for two in the first quarter if it creates a two possession game?


I wouldn't hate it.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,094
And1: 4,533
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#737 » by BUCKnation » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:53 am

F*** me that loss was preventable
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,011
And1: 29,989
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#738 » by Ron Swanson » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:54 am

Whelp, defense gave the offense two shots at tying it up.

:dontknow:
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,116
And1: 41,634
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#739 » by emunney » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:54 am

dedned wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:Isn’t that pass interference

Yes. The rules suck cause that can't be challenged. Tho it was a turnover sonit should get looked at. Tho maybe they don't care about pi then. Kinda F'y. Think that would be the play you would have reviewable pi for. But wtf do I know.


I thought all turnovers and scoring plays were automatically reviewed?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,986
And1: 15,536
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#740 » by rilamann » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:54 am

Between our play and the officiating, that game was really annoying to watch.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****

Return to Green Bay Packers