Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,203
- And1: 9,787
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Ends on a PI. Fitting.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
Jollay
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 13,024
- And1: 661
- Joined: Apr 25, 2003
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
What we cant challenge just for the helluva it that there was pass interference?
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
Mags FTW
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,556
- And1: 8,130
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
He was on MVS' back, but whatever
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
TroyD92
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,724
- And1: 11,375
- Joined: Mar 28, 2013
- Location: Renewed Hope
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Isn’t that pass interference
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- Magic Giannison
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,848
- And1: 27,302
- Joined: Aug 08, 2014
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Sorry guys it seems i was bad luck ...
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,116
- And1: 41,634
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Jesus Christ that was an unbelievably rough ending to a game from all angles.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- MoMM
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,591
- And1: 1,778
- Joined: Jan 08, 2002
- Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
OH GOD!
So basically we had 2 TDs to score in the 3-yard line or less and couldn't make any of them.
Congrats! We deserved to lose it.
So basically we had 2 TDs to score in the 3-yard line or less and couldn't make any of them.
Congrats! We deserved to lose it.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 108,448
- And1: 42,632
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
That was the most unwatchable **** of a game I've ever seen.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,166
- And1: 27,780
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
XtremeDunkz
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,512
- And1: 7,063
- Joined: Mar 08, 2012
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
**** game with Dallas next.
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
ACGB
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,757
- And1: 2,877
- Joined: Jan 24, 2006
- Location: 414
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
This isn't sour grapes. Once the Packers are bad I have no interest in this. It's an awful game that makes no sense.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- JayMKE
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,379
- And1: 17,245
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
- Location: LA
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,116
- And1: 41,634
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Lazard is still #1.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- TJ_Ford_11
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,257
- And1: 967
- Joined: Nov 09, 2005
- Location: Hawaii
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
trwi7 wrote:TJ_Ford_11 wrote:trwi7 wrote:
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.
But there was over a quarter to play still. You never know what’s going to happen the rest of the game. Too much time left to go for two
A two possession lead is always better than a one possession lead no matter the time especially with no risk of trailing if the opponent scores a touchdown.
Go for two in the first quarter if it creates a two possession game?

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- dedned
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,737
- And1: 1,480
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: nowhere
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
TroyD92 wrote:Isn’t that pass interference
Yes. The rules suck cause that can't be challenged. Tho it was a turnover sonit should get looked at. Tho maybe they don't care about pi then. Kinda F'y. Think that would be the play you would have reviewable pi for. But wtf do I know.

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,166
- And1: 27,780
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:trwi7 wrote:TJ_Ford_11 wrote:
But there was over a quarter to play still. You never know what’s going to happen the rest of the game. Too much time left to go for two
A two possession lead is always better than a one possession lead no matter the time especially with no risk of trailing if the opponent scores a touchdown.
Go for two in the first quarter if it creates a two possession game?
I wouldn't hate it.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,094
- And1: 4,533
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
F*** me that loss was preventable
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,013
- And1: 29,990
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Whelp, defense gave the offense two shots at tying it up.

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,116
- And1: 41,634
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
dedned wrote:TroyD92 wrote:Isn’t that pass interference
Yes. The rules suck cause that can't be challenged. Tho it was a turnover sonit should get looked at. Tho maybe they don't care about pi then. Kinda F'y. Think that would be the play you would have reviewable pi for. But wtf do I know.
I thought all turnovers and scoring plays were automatically reviewed?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,986
- And1: 15,536
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: The Land of Giannis.
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Between our play and the officiating, that game was really annoying to watch.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****












