Week 8: Non-Packers
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Week 8: Non-Packers
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Week 8: Non-Packers
http://accuscore.com/football-betting-s ... ing-system
Playoff projections nearly halfway through:
NFC:
1. Packers (13.5-2.5)
2. Saints (11.2-4.8)
3. Niners (10.8-5.2)
4. Cowboys (9.3-6.7)
5. Falcons (9.2-6.8)
6. Lions (9.1-6.9)
AFC:
1. Patriots (12.0-4.0)
2. Steelers (11.2-4.8)
3. Chargers (10.1-5.9)
4. Texans (9.6-6.4)
5. Ravens (10.3-5.7)
6. Bills (9.1-6.9)
Games of note this week:
Saints @ Rams - go Rams
Dolphins @ Giants - go Dolphins
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Redskins @ Bills - go Bills
Lions @ Broncos - go Broncos
Browns @ Niners - go Browns
Cowboys @ Eagles - don't care, I guess go Eagles
Some pretty bad matchups, lots of heavy favorites in the NFC games.
Playoff projections nearly halfway through:
NFC:
1. Packers (13.5-2.5)
2. Saints (11.2-4.8)
3. Niners (10.8-5.2)
4. Cowboys (9.3-6.7)
5. Falcons (9.2-6.8)
6. Lions (9.1-6.9)
AFC:
1. Patriots (12.0-4.0)
2. Steelers (11.2-4.8)
3. Chargers (10.1-5.9)
4. Texans (9.6-6.4)
5. Ravens (10.3-5.7)
6. Bills (9.1-6.9)
Games of note this week:
Saints @ Rams - go Rams
Dolphins @ Giants - go Dolphins
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Redskins @ Bills - go Bills
Lions @ Broncos - go Broncos
Browns @ Niners - go Browns
Cowboys @ Eagles - don't care, I guess go Eagles
Some pretty bad matchups, lots of heavy favorites in the NFC games.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Bernard Berrian released. They got good return on that investment.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Marley2Hendrix
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,715
- And1: 2,601
- Joined: Jun 16, 2003
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
LUKE23 wrote:Bernard Berrian released. They got good return on that investment.
Yep, bernard DID NOT add to Minnesota's league leading number of players arrested during his time with the vikings. I think that is a net positive for that franchise (note - I didn't look it up to verify that Berrian did not get arrested, which may not have been a safe assumption on my part).
You gotta make it sexy! Hips and nips, otherwise I'm not eating.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Letting Berrian go was one of, if not the smartest moves the Bears have made in the last 10 years.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 103,200
- And1: 55,709
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Crap games this week. Good time to take a Sunday NFL break and get ready for the rest of the season.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- SheedsWeed
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,931
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
- Contact:
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Saw a segment on NFL Live with TO working out today. I wonder if any teams will sign him. They mentioned SF as a possible team, but idk if they want his distractions considering they started the season pretty decently.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,626
- And1: 4,262
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
SheedsWeed wrote:Saw a segment on NFL Live with TO working out today. I wonder if any teams will sign him. They mentioned SF as a possible team, but idk if they want his distractions considering they started the season pretty decently.
he didnt cause any problems in buffalo, im surprised no one else is giving him a shot
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,496
- And1: 59
- Joined: Oct 19, 2005
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
LUKE23 wrote:Games of note this week:
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Why are we cheering for the Vikings here?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 107,879
- And1: 42,171
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
skitch815 wrote:LUKE23 wrote:Games of note this week:
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Why are we cheering for the Vikings here?
The more wins they get the further they are away from an impact player. Luck, Blackmon, etc.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,626
- And1: 4,262
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
DrugBust wrote:skitch815 wrote:LUKE23 wrote:Games of note this week:
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Why are we cheering for the Vikings here?
The more wins they get the further they are away from an impact player. Luck, Blackmon, etc.
makes sense, i was wondering the same thing at first
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
BUCKnation wrote:he didnt cause any problems in buffalo, im surprised no one else is giving him a shot
He's old, he wasn't very good last year, he is coming off of a major surgery and he is a serious risk in the locker room.
I'd be surprised if anyone did give him a shot.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- SheedsWeed
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,931
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
- Contact:
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Newz wrote:BUCKnation wrote:he didnt cause any problems in buffalo, im surprised no one else is giving him a shot
He's old, he wasn't very good last year, he is coming off of a major surgery and he is a serious risk in the locker room.
I'd be surprised if anyone did give him a shot.
I don't know, the way Oakland evaluated Carson Palmer's worth, they might sign T.O. and officially "go all-in this year."
Wow, I still can't believe the draft picks they gave up for that guy. Unbelievable.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Honestly, if I'm Chicago, I'm giving him a look.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,496
- And1: 59
- Joined: Oct 19, 2005
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
The surgery definitely is a huge flag but would you really say TO wasn't very good last year? 72 catches 983 yards and 9 TDs seems pretty good considering he was Cincy's #2 WR
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Ill-yasova
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,364
- And1: 2,562
- Joined: Jul 13, 2006
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,626
- And1: 4,262
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
LUKE23 wrote:Honestly, if I'm Chicago, I'm giving him a look.
speaking of...
http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/7152162/chicago-bears-take-chance-terrell-owens
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Badgerlander
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,063
- And1: 7,488
- Joined: Jun 29, 2007
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Carimi is back
Chris Harris confirmed he was released this morning. Was inactive in Week 6, started Week 7.
Chris Harris confirmed he was released this morning. Was inactive in Week 6, started Week 7.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Spoiler:
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
THE PACKERS HAVE DONE IT!
WE ARE AT THE TOP OF THE REALGM POWER RANKINGS! SWEET FORMULA!!!!!11!
WE ARE AT THE TOP OF THE REALGM POWER RANKINGS! SWEET FORMULA!!!!!11!
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,601
- And1: 4,456
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
I don't necessarily see what is so horrible about those formulas. They take a larger sample to straighten themselves out.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
GrendonJennings wrote:I don't necessarily see what is so horrible about those formulas. They take a larger sample to straighten themselves out.
So when is it going to straighten itself out? Almost 50% of the season is gone and it's supposed to be a week-by-week power ranking.
The formula still can't determine it's dumb to have the Saints as the 9th best team in the league?
I'd agree it wouldn't be horrible if it ever came even remotely close to projecting an accurate list.