GT: Pats @ Pack
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
GT: Pats @ Pack
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,389
- And1: 8,012
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
GT: Pats @ Pack
I guess nobody is watching.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Rodger's looks off. Adams had a step on his guy both times and neither throw was catchable.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,600
- And1: 4,251
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Terrible play calling in the redzone.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- LikeABosh
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,125
- And1: 8,855
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Mags FTW wrote:I guess nobody is watching.
New England is a good team. Too scary to watch
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,180
- And1: 1,383
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Let's go Pack.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
-
- Senior
- Posts: 731
- And1: 171
- Joined: Dec 26, 2012
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
surprised we chose to receive to start the game, it seems like we almost always defer. love the blocking on those lacy runs and rodgers had all day to throw on that defensive holding call. Even though had some early success with the run, i hope MM doesn't forget what brought us here- #12 and his arm.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- SupremeHustle
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,423
- And1: 30,978
- Joined: Feb 11, 2005
- Location: Cloud 9
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Balls2TheWalls wrote:Rodger's looks off. Adams had a step on his guy both times and neither throw was catchable.
He needs to R-E-L-A-X.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,180
- And1: 1,383
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Barring ton!
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
-
- Senior
- Posts: 731
- And1: 171
- Joined: Dec 26, 2012
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
hopefully we get a little subconscious hometown bias from Ed
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,785
- And1: 27,353
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Belichick is crazy enough to fake punt here.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Barrington is a load.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- LittleRooster
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,599
- And1: 3,247
- Joined: Apr 02, 2010
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Barrington showing up. No idea what Hyde was doing there
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- LikeABosh
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,125
- And1: 8,855
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Hyde, please don't do that
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- Aaron It Out
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,804
- And1: 3,101
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
- Location: Black Mercedes
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
What are you doing Hyde?
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
-
- Senior
- Posts: 731
- And1: 171
- Joined: Dec 26, 2012
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
how does that work, what does the announcer mean by free play?
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,785
- And1: 27,353
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
If it touched a Patriots player wouldn't the ball be dead at the spot it was touched?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,389
- And1: 8,012
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
It was touched. He can pick it up.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,150
- And1: 9,761
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
He was trying to catch them off guard. Didn't work.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,600
- And1: 4,251
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
It's actually a really smart play. If the kicking team touches it, but doesn't pick it up, the receiving team can grab it and run with it. Even if they fumble, they still keep the ball, except it is just where the kicking team touched it first. Only positive outcomes can occur, similar to an offsides free play.
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: GT: Pats @ Pack
Mags FTW wrote:It was touched. He can pick it up.
So if hyde touches it after, it's not a fumble for us?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.