Stocco to the Pack

Joeflyers · Post #1 » by **Joeflyers** » Wed May 2, 2007 4:38 am

Sorry if posted

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=600076

Ill-yasova · Post #2 » by **Ill-yasova** » Wed May 2, 2007 4:41 am

I'm not usually one to use multiple icons, but , COME ON!!!

MikeIsGood · Post #3 » by **MikeIsGood** » Wed May 2, 2007 4:42 am

To be honest, I doubt he makes the team. But best of luck to him, and I of course hope he plays well enough to make the team. I just don't see it happening.

Super solid QB in college; really turned my opinion of him around and I was a supporter for his Senior season. But I just don't think he has the tools to make it in the pros. But I guess we'll see. He could prove me wrong again.

Ill-yasova · Post #4 » by **Ill-yasova** » Wed May 2, 2007 4:46 am

Product of an excellent receiving core.

Ayt · Post #5 » by **Ayt** » Wed May 2, 2007 4:54 am

Ill-yasova wrote::banghead:
I'm not usually one to use multiple icons, but , COME ON!!!

Its just a tryout. He has no future in the NFL.

MajorDad · Post #6 » by **MajorDad** » Wed May 2, 2007 5:00 am

the packers will probably show him off in an exhibition so that he can try to catch on with somebody. As camp fodder goes, he's as good as anybody.

trwi7 · Post #7 » by **trwi7** » Wed May 2, 2007 6:56 am

Ill-yasova wrote:Product of an excellent receiving core.

Because he had such a great, proven recieving core last year. :crazy:

Fort Minor · Post #8 » by **Fort Minor** » Wed May 2, 2007 6:58 am

Ayt wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Its just a tryout. He has no future in the NFL.

Post #9 » by **MickeyDavis** » Wed May 2, 2007 1:11 pm

Stocco >>>>>>>>>> Rodgers

ahagen87 · Post #10 » by **ahagen87** » Wed May 2, 2007 3:36 pm

i dont know why everyone hates on stocco he has made tremendous strides since his early days...even after loosing 3 of his passing targets to the pros he still put up great numbers. i dont see how this isnt a nice 3rd qb. you guys are jumping on him like we are trying him out to succeed farve. ive watched him ever since he came into college football and stats wise and opinon wise he is one of the top qbs to ever play at wisconsin.

Profound23 · Post #11 » by **Profound23** » Wed May 2, 2007 6:34 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Stocco >>>>>>>>>> Rodgers

Would not go that far, but possibly Stocco=Rodgers

mnstinks · Post #12 » by **mnstinks** » Wed May 2, 2007 8:36 pm

Ingle Martin > Stocco

crkone · Post #13 » by **crkone** » Wed May 2, 2007 8:43 pm

I'll jump into this:

Stocco>Favre

Ill-yasova · Post #14 » by **Ill-yasova** » Wed May 2, 2007 8:58 pm

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Because he had such a great, proven recieving core last year.

You're right. Hubbard, Beckum, and Swan were a terrible recieving corps. Beckum led all TE's in the nation in recieving. Hubbard and Swan each had 600 yards. Not to mention 5 TD's from all 3 players. What was I thinking? Stocco carried that team :roll:

.

The Brewers aren't proven either. Doesn't mean they aren't really good.[/b]

trwi7 · Post #15 » by **trwi7** » Wed May 2, 2007 9:04 pm

Ill-yasova wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

You're right. Hubbard, Beckum, and Swan were a terrible recieving corps. Beckum led all TE's in the nation in recieving. Hubbard and Swan each had 600 yards. Not to mention 5 TD's from all 3 players. What was I thinking? Stocco carried that team .

Not saying they didn't turn out to be good but the 3 of them combined for ONE catch prior to last year.

You can't just give Stocco a little bit of credit for getting them the ball?

Ill-yasova · Post #16 » by **Ill-yasova** » Wed May 2, 2007 9:14 pm

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Not saying they didn't turn out to be good but the 3 of them combined for ONE catch prior to last year.

You can't just give Stocco a little bit of credit for getting them the ball?

Very true. They were unproven. But I think we all can agree that not many people had the weapons Stocco had these last couple of years.

Ayt · Post #17 » by **Ayt** » Wed May 2, 2007 9:15 pm

^And Beckum spent the previous season on D. Stocco had a damn fine year.

Regardless, he was a solid college QB but he simply isn't good enough to play in the NFL.

trwi7 · Post #18 » by **trwi7** » Wed May 2, 2007 9:42 pm

Ayt wrote:^And Beckum spent the previous season on D. Stocco had a damn fine year.

Regardless, he was a solid college QB but he simply isn't good enough to play in the NFL.

Agreed. Almost no athleticism to escape when the pocket collapses. Decent arm, nothing special though but he had a damn fine college career and got a degree from a great university which is more than 95% of people can say.