Darrell Jackson traded to SF for late 4th round pick

horaceworthy · Post #1 » by **horaceworthy** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:15 pm

Why couldn't we have swung a deal like that and gotten the offense a proven weapon. I like Rice and I haven't given up on Williamson yet (he's got one more season before I do that), but it would have been real nice to get the offense a proven 1,000 yard WR like Jackson, since both Rice and Williamson are unproven as NFL receivers.

Post #2 » by **revprodeji** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:24 pm

yea, besides the fact that they hate us maybe? I really dont know. I would have made that trade no doubt.

weird they make it with a rival

dunkonu21 · Post #3 » by **dunkonu21** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 6:39 pm

I kinda like that we have young recievers with our young qb so they can grow together...

Post #4 » by **revprodeji** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 6:41 pm

true, true...I see value in that. Plus all players should buy into the system easier

horaceworthy · Post #5 » by **horaceworthy** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 9:08 pm

I'd be fine with having a few young receivers, but it takes a couple years for most receivers to adjust to the league, and I'd prefer we had at least one guy who'd established himself as a reliable target so that TJax had a safety net. I don't want his confidence and mechanics to get crushed by guys dropping balls or not being able to get open. We ended up getting a 3rd rounder for our late 4th though, so I'm happy with that.