Image

Anyone else upset with Raptors management right now?

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

blue_gold7
Ballboy
Posts: 46
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 19, 2008

Anyone else upset with Raptors management right now? 

Post#1 » by blue_gold7 » Sat Apr 5, 2008 2:03 pm

I am, if they were to protest that game and win it would be huge for us right now. Oh well....
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#2 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Sat Apr 5, 2008 4:14 pm

We would be within 2 games I believe. If we beat Atlanta it would be 1 game. This could have been huge, I'm a little upset yes. I really don't see much of a difference from picking #10 or #11 than I do at #15.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,711
And1: 13,952
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

 

Post#3 » by Scoot McGroot » Sat Apr 5, 2008 5:23 pm

Eh, they're in a playoff race as well, and could use the win as much as we could. I trust their judgment that they're doing what they think is best for their franchise. I can't imagine them sacrificing a game if it meant the difference between matchups or possibly a home-court in the first round.
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#4 » by FreeRon » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:13 am

From their standpoint, though, maybe they get a better matchup from dropping, or maybe they just didn't want to have to play the game over from that point this close to the playoffs. There's no guarantee that they make the shot if they play it over. On top of that, what are the odds of the NBA replaying it? What would they do if Toronto missed the shot? Play overtime again? They already did that. So if Toronto misses they lose? It just doesn't make sense to play over.
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#5 » by JoshB914 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 7:50 am

They didn't protest because the NBA probably told them they wouldn't win. Reversing the decision would have gone against every decision Stern has ever made with regard to his referees. It would have been a waste of time and $$$.
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

 

Post#6 » by Miller4ever » Sun Apr 6, 2008 3:14 pm

Yup, mostly because the NBA told the Raps they REALLY don't like to be wrong. Like when there's a brawl. Overpunishing is not wrong. Destroying a franchise is okay, because Stern said so. Also, the Knicks get all the breaks.

Protesting would be unnecessary if the Raps held on to a double-digit lead.
User avatar
JazzItUp13
Veteran
Posts: 2,640
And1: 1
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Whatchu want!?

 

Post#7 » by JazzItUp13 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 10:43 pm

yeah. It was worth a shot...what's 10k in this damn league? the price for 1 game in a 10 day contract? Stupid raps. I will be even more pissed if we miss the playoffs by 1 gm.
I got a question why they hating on me....
User avatar
TSC25
Veteran
Posts: 2,549
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Location: Indianapolis

 

Post#8 » by TSC25 » Mon Apr 7, 2008 12:00 am

JoshB914 wrote:They didn't protest because the NBA probably told them they wouldn't win. Reversing the decision would have gone against every decision Stern has ever made with regard to his referees. It would have been a waste of time and $$$.


Plus if Stern thinks it would screw the Pacers by not playing it again then we all know he wouldnt do it!
User avatar
count55
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,431
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Location: In Memoriam: pf

 

Post#9 » by count55 » Mon Apr 7, 2008 11:15 am

I've pulled the draft related talk out of this topic. This thread is probably pretty much dead now, but it should move back to discussing the Raps' decision not to protest the Hawks game.
I have no idea what you're talking about, and clearly, neither do you.

Return to Indiana Pacers