Charcoal Filtered wrote:We had more than the MLE even with extending Foster. Subtract Foster, Jones, and Watson. That was plenty of money to absorb JJ by just using cap space.
We were under the luxury tax, but we would not have been under the cap at all, subtracting the 3 guys that shared the MLE and Foster. That would've put Indy at around $54 million in salaries committed to only 11 players (meaning we'd have to add a couple of minimum salaried guys). That would've put Indy only about $2million under the salary cap. Once again, not enough to take on Jared Jeffries and his $6.5 million salary. Possibly could've then included some side salary to make the numbers work to take on Jeffries, but we wouldn't have had enough to take on Jordan Hill's contract as well, lessening the value of the deal immensely.
We just weren't going to be in that position, without convincing a guy like Drew Gooden to take a ridiculous non-guaranteed deal.