Granger
for
Millsap
CJ Miles
Millsap would be a 20/10 guy on your team when he doesn't need to share touches with Jefferson and CJ would be a 15ppg starter. Fair value? We could also throw in Price, or Elson to make the money match.
Trade Proposal
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Re: Trade Proposal
-
Miller4ever
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,596
- And1: 283
- Joined: Jun 24, 2005
- Location: Location: Location:
Re: Trade Proposal
Put it in the trade thread next time.
It's fair value, but we don't have the need to make this move right now.
It's fair value, but we don't have the need to make this move right now.
Re: Trade Proposal
-
Indy2thaWindy
- Banned User
- Posts: 10,619
- And1: 16
- Joined: Jun 15, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
Re: Trade Proposal
We don't value Miles like Utah does, so to us he is just a throw in where he isn't to you guys.
I wouldn't do it.
I wouldn't do it.
Re: Trade Proposal
-
Boneman2
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,314
- And1: 1,665
- Joined: Jul 07, 2003
- Location: Indy
-
Re: Trade Proposal
I'm with Indy, we could sign David West or Z. Randolph outright, and keep Granger.
Trading Granger for almost any PF makes absolutely no sense at all. To me that PF would have to be head-n-shoulders above the two guys I just mentioned.
Thats where I am at.. to the point that I would sign Randolph if it meant we didn't have to trade Danny. Once this team has a grinder down low, we'll take our respect forcibly.
Trading Granger for almost any PF makes absolutely no sense at all. To me that PF would have to be head-n-shoulders above the two guys I just mentioned.
Thats where I am at.. to the point that I would sign Randolph if it meant we didn't have to trade Danny. Once this team has a grinder down low, we'll take our respect forcibly.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
Re: Trade Proposal
-
kdawg531
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 795
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 03, 2002
- Location: Bloomington, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: Trade Proposal
Indy2thaWindy wrote:We don't value Miles like Utah does, so to us he is just a throw in where he isn't to you guys.
I wouldn't do it.
I agree. Plus that would put us at 16 guys on the roster. I wouldn't have a problem cutting a couple guys but this doesn't seem like something we need to do right now.
Re: Trade Proposal
-
Draft Master J
- Banned User
- Posts: 358
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 04, 2010
- Location: King George
- Contact:
Re: Trade Proposal
Agreed with Boneman. Millsap is good but I don't think I'd give up Granger for him, especially with McBob/T looking solid and two or three nice PFs being available in the upcoming class of free agents, certainly better than the (attainable) SFs that will be available.
Re: Trade Proposal
-
Indy4Life
- Sophomore
- Posts: 167
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jul 05, 2008
Re: Trade Proposal
How about we counter with:
Ford-Dunleavy-Foster
for
Kirilinko - Milsap
Collison-Price-Lance
George-Rush (makes me think of GSP everytime I see this duo)
Granger-Kirilinko-Jones
Milsap-Hansbrough
Hibbert-Jones
Ford-Dunleavy-Foster
for
Kirilinko - Milsap
Collison-Price-Lance
George-Rush (makes me think of GSP everytime I see this duo)
Granger-Kirilinko-Jones
Milsap-Hansbrough
Hibbert-Jones
Re: Trade Proposal
-
Starkiller
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,014
- And1: 269
- Joined: Nov 24, 2009
-
Re: Trade Proposal
Indy4Life wrote:How about we counter with:
Ford-Dunleavy-Foster
for
Kirilinko - Milsap
Collison-Price-Lance
George-Rush (makes me think of GSP everytime I see this duo)
Granger-Kirilinko-Jones
Milsap-Hansbrough
Hibbert-Jones
You forgot McRoberts in your depth chart, and I love that trade, but Utah would never take it.
This ^