Image

Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 632
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#21 » by 8305 » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:25 am

Miller4ever wrote:Hansbrough is smart and he's gonna get better. He was pretty slipshod as a team defender but as soon as his effort gets funneled correctly from overly incessant boxing out to sound decision-making, he'll be at least average, and I think he can be good. Remember, he's never had a full offseason and his rookie year was basically a do-over.


That's how I see too.

Hansbrough is a better player than Hickson now and I like him better long term.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,047
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#22 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:15 am

8305 wrote:
Miller4ever wrote:Hansbrough is smart and he's gonna get better. He was pretty slipshod as a team defender but as soon as his effort gets funneled correctly from overly incessant boxing out to sound decision-making, he'll be at least average, and I think he can be good. Remember, he's never had a full offseason and his rookie year was basically a do-over.


That's how I see too.

Hansbrough is a better player than Hickson now and I like him better long term.


Well, that's simply incorrect about Hansbrough being a better player than Hickson right now. Maybe that only has to do with the fact that Hickson has more NBA experience than Tyler and that he's further ahead of the curve, but right now, Hickson is a superior player to Hansbrough.

Don't get me wrong, I'd like to ADD Hickson to Hansbrough. I think between those two, you've got a great PF rotation for the long haul, especially with Roy Hibbert.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 632
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#23 » by 8305 » Sun Jun 19, 2011 12:23 pm

Not saying I wouldn't like add Hickson too. No getting around his superior rebounding numbers to Hansbrough. They are both experiencing growing pains as defenders although I think Hansbrough is further along in this phase. Do you think Hickson is a better offensive player? Hansbrough had a pretty strong stretch in his own right.
Indy2thaWindy
Banned User
Posts: 10,619
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 15, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#24 » by Indy2thaWindy » Sun Jun 19, 2011 12:58 pm

8305 wrote:Not saying I wouldn't like add Hickson too. No getting around his superior rebounding numbers to Hansbrough. They are both experiencing growing pains as defenders although I think Hansbrough is further along in this phase. Do you think Hickson is a better offensive player? Hansbrough had a pretty strong stretch in his own right.


Hansbrough had a good stretch of games.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/tyler_hansbrough/game_by_game_stats.html

But Hickson had some ridiculous games which seems like every other game starting in January.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jj_hickson/game_by_game_stats.html

If he could just find some consistency, I see no reason why he can't be an all-star. Hickson is also almost 3 years younger than Hansbrough.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 632
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#25 » by 8305 » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:21 pm

Indy2thaWindy wrote:
8305 wrote:Not saying I wouldn't like add Hickson too. No getting around his superior rebounding numbers to Hansbrough. They are both experiencing growing pains as defenders although I think Hansbrough is further along in this phase. Do you think Hickson is a better offensive player? Hansbrough had a pretty strong stretch in his own right.


Hansbrough had a good stretch of games.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/tyler_hansbrough/game_by_game_stats.html

But Hickson had some ridiculous games which seems like every other game starting in January.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jj_hickson/game_by_game_stats.html

If he could just find some consistency, I see no reason why he can't be an all-star. Hickson is also almost 3 years younger than Hansbrough.


Have to admit Hickson had some monster games. Statistically he's achieved more offensively than Hansbroug so you got me on that point. Still I wouldn't move Hansbrough for him though. Not all value is measured statistically and I think Hansbrough brings some unique intangible qualities that the Pacers need. Cop out? Maybe. Me being a fan of Tyler's style of play and over estimating his value? Probably. FWIW, I didn't think that much of him in college. It wasn't until I had a chance to see him regularly that I developed an appreciation for his game.
paulgeorge24
Banned User
Posts: 340
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 25, 2011

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#26 » by paulgeorge24 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:08 am

8305 wrote:
Indy2thaWindy wrote:
8305 wrote:Not saying I wouldn't like add Hickson too. No getting around his superior rebounding numbers to Hansbrough. They are both experiencing growing pains as defenders although I think Hansbrough is further along in this phase. Do you think Hickson is a better offensive player? Hansbrough had a pretty strong stretch in his own right.


Hansbrough had a good stretch of games.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/tyler_hansbrough/game_by_game_stats.html

But Hickson had some ridiculous games which seems like every other game starting in January.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jj_hickson/game_by_game_stats.html

If he could just find some consistency, I see no reason why he can't be an all-star. Hickson is also almost 3 years younger than Hansbrough.


Have to admit Hickson had some monster games. Statistically he's achieved more offensively than Hansbroug so you got me on that point. Still I wouldn't move Hansbrough for him though. Not all value is measured statistically and I think Hansbrough brings some unique intangible qualities that the Pacers need. Cop out? Maybe. Me being a fan of Tyler's style of play and over estimating his value? Probably. FWIW, I didn't think that much of him in college. It wasn't until I had a chance to see him regularly that I developed an appreciation for his game.

I KNEW IT. MYSTERY SOLVED.
User avatar
Kaner
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,625
And1: 8
Joined: Nov 23, 2010
Location: PHX/CLE

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#27 » by Kaner » Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:45 pm

What do u guys see Brandon Rush's ceiling as? I honestly am kinda intrigued by the one posters offer of Rush+15 for Hickson, Cleveland has ZERO SG, and also was rumored to want Marshon Brooks around pick 15...that would be instant young depth at the 2 spot, and would thin out our PF rotation, leaving Samuels, Jamison and Varejao to man the 4 spot.
Image
User avatar
Starkiller
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,014
And1: 269
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
     

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#28 » by Starkiller » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:00 pm

Kaner wrote:What do u guys see Brandon Rush's ceiling as? I honestly am kinda intrigued by the one posters offer of Rush+15 for Hickson, Cleveland has ZERO SG, and also was rumored to want Marshon Brooks around pick 15...that would be instant young depth at the 2 spot, and would thin out our PF rotation, leaving Samuels, Jamison and Varejao to man the 4 spot.


Not much better than what he is now, but what he is now, most people don't really realize, if that makes sense.

He's a great wing defender and good 3 shooter, but most people don't know that because most don't know much about Indy and Rush doesn't play as much anymore.
This ^
Macho King
Banned User
Posts: 63
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2011

Re: Report: Cavaliers shopping J.J. Hickson, too 

Post#29 » by Macho King » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:15 pm

Hickson's a little bit more productive than I realized. Granted, his offense is inflated due to post-LeBron Cleveland being an embarrassment, but he's a very strong rebounder. I'd do Rush & #15 for him.

Return to Indiana Pacers