Image

Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, boomershadow, Jake0890

ducler
Cold Hard Gameday Facts
Posts: 10,947
And1: 7,518
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: France
Contact:
   

Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#1 » by ducler » Wed Mar 4, 2020 12:35 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
User avatar
boomershadow
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 3,626
And1: 3,563
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
Location: Naptown
   

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#2 » by boomershadow » Wed Mar 4, 2020 2:18 pm

Read on Twitter
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 15,352
And1: 2,142
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#3 » by basketballwacko2 » Thu Mar 5, 2020 4:27 am

I tried I couldn't watch.
User avatar
Pacersike
Analyst
Posts: 3,105
And1: 756
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Location: Belgium

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#4 » by Pacersike » Thu Mar 5, 2020 12:35 pm

No worries, this season is all about developing chemistry for upcoming seasons.

And yes, Pacers need to develop great team chemistry to be able to win playoffs series.

Sab and/or Myle will only enter their primes next season (turning 25 years old in the playoffs).

Brogdon, who we all knew is often hurt, might play with pain if these were playoffs games.

Vic has the clutch gene and those things don't just go away, they are written in your body.

We do need a Thad Young type of player though, preferably someone a tad better than him.

The best is yet to come.

Go Pacers!
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,815
And1: 3,744
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#5 » by Scoot McGroot » Thu Mar 5, 2020 2:47 pm

Also, Milwaukee is simply the best team in the league and steamrolling everyone else. Absolutely no shame in losing by 19 to them minus two of our best players in Oladipo and Brogdon.
User avatar
Pacersike
Analyst
Posts: 3,105
And1: 756
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Location: Belgium

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#6 » by Pacersike » Thu Mar 5, 2020 3:59 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, Milwaukee is simply the best team in the league and steamrolling everyone else. Absolutely no shame in losing by 19 to them minus two of our best players in Oladipo and Brogdon.

Feeling no shame is a bit too sunshiny for me, considering the Bucks didn't have to push through and our best players were like -40.

As long as they use their feelings of shame in a good way to find better ways to play the Bucks. Getting steamrolled is never ok, unless you are a roadway.
User avatar
Jimmmycrackcorn
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,693
And1: 810
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
     

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#7 » by Jimmmycrackcorn » Thu Mar 5, 2020 4:06 pm

Not trying to be snarky....but are y'all legit concerned about Brogdon's ability to stay healthy yet?
Pacers_Freak
Starter
Posts: 2,407
And1: 2,187
Joined: Oct 06, 2016
   

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#8 » by Pacers_Freak » Thu Mar 5, 2020 4:26 pm

Jimmmycrackcorn wrote:Not trying to be snarky....but are y'all legit concerned about Brogdon's ability to stay healthy yet?


Not trying to be snarky.... the way this season has gone I'm concerned about everyone on our rosters ability to stay healthy.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,815
And1: 3,744
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#9 » by Scoot McGroot » Thu Mar 5, 2020 4:34 pm

Pacersike wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, Milwaukee is simply the best team in the league and steamrolling everyone else. Absolutely no shame in losing by 19 to them minus two of our best players in Oladipo and Brogdon.

Feeling no shame is a bit too sunshiny for me, considering the Bucks didn't have to push through and our best players were like -40.

As long as they use their feelings of shame in a good way to find better ways to play the Bucks. Getting steamrolled is never ok, unless you are a roadway.



You expect our team minus two starters, two of our 4 best players, to compete and beat the best team, by far, in the league every single night, on their home court? If so, you’ve got a point. If not, maybe you’re over reading into what I posted?
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,815
And1: 3,744
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#10 » by Scoot McGroot » Thu Mar 5, 2020 4:37 pm

Jimmmycrackcorn wrote:Not trying to be snarky....but are y'all legit concerned about Brogdon's ability to stay healthy yet?


Not really. Milwaukee was willing to let him go and get worse only because of fear of his injuries. We knew what we were walking into. However, I think if Vic were healthy all year, Malcom probably would’ve actually healed from some of his early injuries. As such, he keeps coming back early in an attempt to help the roster. Probably partially why his teammates love him. I have higher hopes for next year and that he’ll heal up this summer.
User avatar
Pacersike
Analyst
Posts: 3,105
And1: 756
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Location: Belgium

Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET 

Post#11 » by Pacersike » Wed Jun 24, 2020 6:41 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
Pacersike wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, Milwaukee is simply the best team in the league and steamrolling everyone else. Absolutely no shame in losing by 19 to them minus two of our best players in Oladipo and Brogdon.

Feeling no shame is a bit too sunshiny for me, considering the Bucks didn't have to push through and our best players were like -40.

As long as they use their feelings of shame in a good way to find better ways to play the Bucks. Getting steamrolled is never ok, unless you are a roadway.



You expect our team minus two starters, two of our 4 best players, to compete and beat the best team, by far, in the league every single night, on their home court? If so, you’ve got a point. If not, maybe you’re over reading into what I posted?

I'm not and I don't get the point of your reply to be honest. I'm just reading and trying to read, best of health to everyone :)

Return to Indiana Pacers