Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- Cold Hard Gameday Facts
- Posts: 15,519
- And1: 8,943
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
- Location: France
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
- boomershadow
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,380
- And1: 6,305
- Joined: Jul 14, 2014
- Location: Naptown
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,267
- And1: 3,934
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
I tried I couldn't watch.
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
- Pacersike
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,389
- And1: 825
- Joined: Jun 10, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
No worries, this season is all about developing chemistry for upcoming seasons.
And yes, Pacers need to develop great team chemistry to be able to win playoffs series.
Sab and/or Myle will only enter their primes next season (turning 25 years old in the playoffs).
Brogdon, who we all knew is often hurt, might play with pain if these were playoffs games.
Vic has the clutch gene and those things don't just go away, they are written in your body.
We do need a Thad Young type of player though, preferably someone a tad better than him.
The best is yet to come.
Go Pacers!
And yes, Pacers need to develop great team chemistry to be able to win playoffs series.
Sab and/or Myle will only enter their primes next season (turning 25 years old in the playoffs).
Brogdon, who we all knew is often hurt, might play with pain if these were playoffs games.
Vic has the clutch gene and those things don't just go away, they are written in your body.
We do need a Thad Young type of player though, preferably someone a tad better than him.
The best is yet to come.
Go Pacers!
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,768
- And1: 11,063
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
Also, Milwaukee is simply the best team in the league and steamrolling everyone else. Absolutely no shame in losing by 19 to them minus two of our best players in Oladipo and Brogdon.
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
- Pacersike
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,389
- And1: 825
- Joined: Jun 10, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, Milwaukee is simply the best team in the league and steamrolling everyone else. Absolutely no shame in losing by 19 to them minus two of our best players in Oladipo and Brogdon.
Feeling no shame is a bit too sunshiny for me, considering the Bucks didn't have to push through and our best players were like -40.
As long as they use their feelings of shame in a good way to find better ways to play the Bucks. Getting steamrolled is never ok, unless you are a roadway.
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
- Jimmmycrackcorn
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,904
- And1: 983
- Joined: Feb 09, 2017
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
Not trying to be snarky....but are y'all legit concerned about Brogdon's ability to stay healthy yet?
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,901
- And1: 2,713
- Joined: Oct 06, 2016
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
Jimmmycrackcorn wrote:Not trying to be snarky....but are y'all legit concerned about Brogdon's ability to stay healthy yet?
Not trying to be snarky.... the way this season has gone I'm concerned about everyone on our rosters ability to stay healthy.
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,768
- And1: 11,063
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
Pacersike wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, Milwaukee is simply the best team in the league and steamrolling everyone else. Absolutely no shame in losing by 19 to them minus two of our best players in Oladipo and Brogdon.
Feeling no shame is a bit too sunshiny for me, considering the Bucks didn't have to push through and our best players were like -40.
As long as they use their feelings of shame in a good way to find better ways to play the Bucks. Getting steamrolled is never ok, unless you are a roadway.
You expect our team minus two starters, two of our 4 best players, to compete and beat the best team, by far, in the league every single night, on their home court? If so, you’ve got a point. If not, maybe you’re over reading into what I posted?
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,768
- And1: 11,063
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
Jimmmycrackcorn wrote:Not trying to be snarky....but are y'all legit concerned about Brogdon's ability to stay healthy yet?
Not really. Milwaukee was willing to let him go and get worse only because of fear of his injuries. We knew what we were walking into. However, I think if Vic were healthy all year, Malcom probably would’ve actually healed from some of his early injuries. As such, he keeps coming back early in an attempt to help the roster. Probably partially why his teammates love him. I have higher hopes for next year and that he’ll heal up this summer.
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
- Pacersike
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,389
- And1: 825
- Joined: Jun 10, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Re: Game 62: Indiana Pacers (37-24) @ Milwaukee Bucks (52-9) - 7:00 PM ET
Scoot McGroot wrote:Pacersike wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, Milwaukee is simply the best team in the league and steamrolling everyone else. Absolutely no shame in losing by 19 to them minus two of our best players in Oladipo and Brogdon.
Feeling no shame is a bit too sunshiny for me, considering the Bucks didn't have to push through and our best players were like -40.
As long as they use their feelings of shame in a good way to find better ways to play the Bucks. Getting steamrolled is never ok, unless you are a roadway.
You expect our team minus two starters, two of our 4 best players, to compete and beat the best team, by far, in the league every single night, on their home court? If so, you’ve got a point. If not, maybe you’re over reading into what I posted?
I'm not and I don't get the point of your reply to be honest. I'm just reading and trying to read, best of health to everyone