Big J wrote:thesack12 wrote:Big J wrote:Darnold looking good again. Shoulda kept him.
1) Last season you couldn't stand Darnold, repeatedly insinuated he sucked and Lance should have been ahead of him
2) Purdy is SUBSTANTIALLY cheaper than Darnold
3) Even if you want to play the ridiculous Darnold is better than Purdy card, you do realize that Darnold is on a 1 year contract so the possibility exists that SF could bring him back if they so choose to do so, right?
Its almost like you don't realize that Purdy has not been given an extension yet.
I actually think Darnold has better traditional physical traits which gives him a higher upside. I doubt he'd want to come back here after we let him leave.
Yes, yes we know.
When it comes to evaluating QB's, you only care about physical measureables.
SF didn't let Darnold leave, he was a free agent.
Darnold was a 2 time failure before he got to SF. Sam's career was in the crapper. SF and Kyle rehabilitated Darnold's confidence and his leaguewide image. Darnold signing a 1 year contract with SF was by design. It worked out just as he hoped it would, as it led to him getting another chance to be a starting QB.