Trade Targets
Re: Trade Targets
- Yogatti
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,428
- And1: 2,195
- Joined: Oct 29, 2018
-
Re: Trade Targets
We're going to replace Trezz with Thompson hopefully
Re: Trade Targets
-
og15
- Forum Mod - Clippers

- Posts: 51,161
- And1: 33,997
- Joined: Jun 23, 2004
- Location: NBA Fan
-
Re: Trade Targets
Don't care for IT. Don't even think he will see the court. I have no problem with Morris. I think his slightly bigger size and much better shooting ability will benefit the team. Harkless is better defending the 1/2 but he's better defending the 3/4 IMO. He has his attitude issues, but I think that should be fine.
Re: Trade Targets
-
og15
- Forum Mod - Clippers

- Posts: 51,161
- And1: 33,997
- Joined: Jun 23, 2004
- Location: NBA Fan
-
Re: Trade Targets
clipperlover wrote:NippySudz wrote:That's what I thought. I thought he's getting waived.MartinToVaught wrote:
Well, guess we won't have to worry about Isaiah's defense after all.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Makes no sense to waive him. He can score, give Lou rest and his contract ends at the end of the year.
Hard to justify inefficient scoring with poor size and negative defense, very hard to justify playing a guy like that on a championship aspiring team.
Re: Trade Targets
-
NippySudz
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,922
- And1: 1,460
- Joined: Jul 08, 2019
Re: Trade Targets
clipperlover wrote:NippySudz wrote:That's what I thought. I thought he's getting waived.MartinToVaught wrote:
Well, guess we won't have to worry about Isaiah's defense after all.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Makes no sense to waive him. He can score, give Lou rest and his contract ends at the end of the year.
It makes perfect sense to waive him. This isn't the Thomas is the Celtics. This is 2020 Thomas
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Re: Trade Targets
-
NippySudz
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,922
- And1: 1,460
- Joined: Jul 08, 2019
Re: Trade Targets
We need a mobile center than can stretch the floor.
Zu isn't agile and trezz isn't a defender.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Zu isn't agile and trezz isn't a defender.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Re: Trade Targets
-
TheNewEra
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,954
- And1: 10,693
- Joined: Aug 28, 2008
- Location: Lob City
-
Re: Trade Targets
Don’t really see the point of Collison unless he’s a improved defender. Can’t keep stocking guys that need to shoot
Re: Trade Targets
-
TheNewEra
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,954
- And1: 10,693
- Joined: Aug 28, 2008
- Location: Lob City
-
Re: Trade Targets
NippySudz wrote:We need a mobile center than can stretch the floor.
Zu isn't agile and trezz isn't a defender.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Two roster spots have to wait and see who hits buyouts
Re: Trade Targets
- TucsonClip
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,535
- And1: 950
- Joined: Jan 19, 2011
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Targets
MartinToVaught wrote:
Well, guess we won't have to worry about Isaiah's defense after all.
Praise be. Hes not a good fit with the Clippers, and has been terrible this year.
Plus, why would I want to go to the NBA? Duke players suck in the pros.
- Shane Battier
- Shane Battier
Re: Trade Targets
- QRich3
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 5,844
- And1: 3,947
- Joined: Apr 03, 2011
-
Re: Trade Targets
Yeah I think it’s best that we don’t keep him. Two guys just been waived in Burke and Frazier that I’d rather have than IT.
Not great that we had to salary dump a lottery pick a year and a half into his career though
Not great that we had to salary dump a lottery pick a year and a half into his career though
Re: Trade Targets
-
TheNewEra
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,954
- And1: 10,693
- Joined: Aug 28, 2008
- Location: Lob City
-
Re: Trade Targets
QRich3 wrote:Yeah I think it’s best that we don’t keep him. Two guys just been waived in Burke and Frazier that I’d rather have than IT.
Not great that we had to salary dump a lottery pick a year and a half into his career though
Can think of it as Jerome was sacrificed so Mann and Kabengele could stay
Re: Trade Targets
-
clipperlover
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,330
- And1: 1,155
- Joined: Sep 10, 2019
Re: Trade Targets
IT can take Robinson's minutes for now. If a buyout option comes along later, they could still dump him. At least, keep him around until he can't be picked up on a playoff roster. They guy can still hit the 3.
Re: Trade Targets
- Yogatti
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,428
- And1: 2,195
- Joined: Oct 29, 2018
-
Re: Trade Targets
IT got waived.....jesus christ. Stop mentioning that **** scrub's name
Re: Trade Targets
-
NippySudz
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,922
- And1: 1,460
- Joined: Jul 08, 2019
Re: Trade Targets
Dump him. We don't have a guard issue and the guys need reps together.clipperlover wrote:IT can take Robinson's minutes for now. If a buyout option comes along later, they could still dump him. At least, keep him around until he can't be picked up on a playoff roster. They guy can still hit the 3.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Re: Trade Targets
-
TheNewEra
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,954
- And1: 10,693
- Joined: Aug 28, 2008
- Location: Lob City
-
Re: Trade Targets
MartinToVaught wrote:TheNewEra wrote:We legit might curb stomp some teams
Not unless we upgrade the bench defense during buyout season.
Two open roster spots have to believe defense and playmaking will be the goal
Re: Trade Targets
-
clipperlover
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,330
- And1: 1,155
- Joined: Sep 10, 2019
Re: Trade Targets
NippySudz wrote:Dump him. We don't have a guard issue and the guys need reps together.clipperlover wrote:IT can take Robinson's minutes for now. If a buyout option comes along later, they could still dump him. At least, keep him around until he can't be picked up on a playoff roster. They guy can still hit the 3.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Why dump him? We have an open roster spot without dumping him. Kick the tires on him and see what he has. If you cut him and then Lou gets hurt, you can't go get him. The guy has playoff experience. He could allow Lou to take the night off against bottom feeder teams.
Two Spots Open: One Will Be a Playmaker
-
TrueLAfan
- Senior Mod - Clippers

- Posts: 8,265
- And1: 1,795
- Joined: Apr 11, 2001
Two Spots Open: One Will Be a Playmaker
So who's around for us to get as a guy that can run the offense for 10-15 mpg?
Trey Burke: Better shooting, worse defending than Shabazz Napier, so about equal in overall value. Career backup sort of guy--which is kinda what we need. So he’d help. He’s kind of who I’m pushing for here.
Tim Frazier; a level below Burke.
Darren Collison: The best we could do. Probably. In some ways, I’d actually rather have Burke than Darren Collison. Probably not a popular opinion, but Collison is … a little bit of a drama guy. Not the kind of locker room we’ve been pushing. If he signs, good for us--hope he's in shape and doesn't mind being a 10-15 mpg player.
Trey Burke: Better shooting, worse defending than Shabazz Napier, so about equal in overall value. Career backup sort of guy--which is kinda what we need. So he’d help. He’s kind of who I’m pushing for here.
Tim Frazier; a level below Burke.
Darren Collison: The best we could do. Probably. In some ways, I’d actually rather have Burke than Darren Collison. Probably not a popular opinion, but Collison is … a little bit of a drama guy. Not the kind of locker room we’ve been pushing. If he signs, good for us--hope he's in shape and doesn't mind being a 10-15 mpg player.

Re: Trade Targets
- MartinToVaught
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,736
- And1: 17,803
- Joined: Oct 19, 2014
-
Re: Trade Targets
clipperlover wrote:NippySudz wrote:Dump him. We don't have a guard issue and the guys need reps together.clipperlover wrote:IT can take Robinson's minutes for now. If a buyout option comes along later, they could still dump him. At least, keep him around until he can't be picked up on a playoff roster. They guy can still hit the 3.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Why dump him? We have an open roster spot without dumping him. Kick the tires on him and see what he has. If you cut him and then Lou gets hurt, you can't go get him. The guy has playoff experience. He could allow Lou to take the night off against bottom feeder teams.
Do you really want to see a Lou/Isaiah lineup that badly? Because that's what would inevitably happen with Doc and we'd have to watch some of the worst "defense" imaginable.

Re: Trade Targets
- esqtvd
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,187
- And1: 4,864
- Joined: Jun 24, 2017
- Location: LA LA LA LAND
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Targets
QRich3 wrote:Yeah I think it’s best that we don’t keep him. Two guys just been waived in Burke and Frazier that I’d rather have than IT.
Not great that we had to salary dump a lottery pick a year and a half into his career though
burying your mistakes
a worse pick than anything Doc ever did LOL
Are We Having Fun Yet?Re: Trade Targets
-
clipperlover
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,330
- And1: 1,155
- Joined: Sep 10, 2019
Re: Trade Targets
MartinToVaught wrote:clipperlover wrote:NippySudz wrote:Dump him. We don't have a guard issue and the guys need reps together.
Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
Why dump him? We have an open roster spot without dumping him. Kick the tires on him and see what he has. If you cut him and then Lou gets hurt, you can't go get him. The guy has playoff experience. He could allow Lou to take the night off against bottom feeder teams.
Do you really want to see a Lou/Isaiah lineup that badly? Because that's what would inevitably happen with Doc and we'd have to watch some of the worst "defense" imaginable.
No, I don't want to see a Lou/IT line-up in the 2nd unit. I can see a team that can have Lou/IT level scoring on the court for the majority of games. IT certainly isn't a defender, but then neither is Lou. IT can put the ball in the basket though and is on a very cheap contract. You don't dump him without seeing if he can fit into the system.
Return to Los Angeles Clippers









