ImageImageImageImageImage

WE DID IT! (HIBBERT PRESS CONFERENCE EDITION)

Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy

HERE WE COME

ROY
51
58%
HIBBERT
37
42%
 
Total votes: 88

User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#341 » by kblo247 » Wed Jul 8, 2015 9:19 am

crazyeights wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/TJFsports/status/617951963737501696[/tweet]

Interesting stuff here.

If we manage our rotations/minutes correctly, Roy can be a great rim protector for us.


Eights I see your tweet and raise you Hibbert's defensive shot chart

Image
Image
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#342 » by kblo247 » Wed Jul 8, 2015 9:20 am

Funnel your ass off boys if you got common sense. And Scott to make the most of Roy would be best to play him in 7 minute stretches to start the first and third and end the second and fourth
Image
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,933
And1: 3,011
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

 

Post#343 » by tugs » Wed Jul 8, 2015 10:47 am

That's the % misses/makes of opponents?
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: 

Post#344 » by kblo247 » Wed Jul 8, 2015 11:09 am

tugs wrote:That's the % misses/makes of opponents?

It's what teams shoot vs ROY when he contests those areas. He can change a game defensively.

Example, last year teams shoot at a 44% clip vs him in the painted area. We were a bottom I've orst team in the league at paint protection fg% and points wise.

Another semi interesting note for those keeping score, we were eighth in pace last year for the games Kobe played, so yeah we should be able to run with him at the 3 and Roy at the 5 decently well
Image
User avatar
ratra_1211
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,711
And1: 271
Joined: Oct 08, 2012
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
   

Re: Re: Re: 

Post#345 » by ratra_1211 » Wed Jul 8, 2015 1:21 pm

kblo247 wrote:
tugs wrote:That's the % misses/makes of opponents?

It's what teams shoot vs ROY when he contests those areas. He can change a game defensively.

Example, last year teams shoot at a 44% clip vs him in the painted area. We were a bottom I've orst team in the league at paint protection fg% and points wise.

Another semi interesting note for those keeping score, we were eighth in pace last year for the games Kobe played, so yeah we should be able to run with him at the 3 and Roy at the 5 decently well


How do you measure pace?
Can it be inflated by the fact that kobe shoot alot?
User avatar
Danny Darko
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 18,742
And1: 6,055
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
         

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#346 » by Danny Darko » Wed Jul 8, 2015 1:54 pm

I don't know why people like Ed's D. Ed was awful at actual defense and only had the occasional flashy block. Roy is the real deal defensively.
Image
ak7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 1,383
Joined: Jun 04, 2012

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#347 » by ak7 » Wed Jul 8, 2015 2:11 pm

In a league where defensive centers who protect the rim are a must, I like the low-risk, high-reward potential of this move. Kupchak saved a bit of face with this move, in my opinion. I actually like this more so than signing LMA and forcing Randle to the 3 spot. Preserve our cap space, take a flier on a guy who can impact the game in a way we haven't had a player do so in a while, and hopefully win some games this year.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,149
And1: 33,846
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#348 » by Slava » Wed Jul 8, 2015 3:17 pm

If Hibbert had Kwame hands, he'd still be getting paid big bucks for his rim protection alone. It surprises me how much Larry wanted him out that he sent him to us for free.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
oneseven
Sophomore
Posts: 189
And1: 32
Joined: May 29, 2015

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#349 » by oneseven » Wed Jul 8, 2015 4:22 pm

It's a pickle. We want him to be good but not too good. If he beasts it and returns to 12-13 form he'll probably want big big money and to play with a LOB true contender, not a team a few yrs away still.
thread killer wrote:Asterisk anything after 1989. The 4-team expansion ruined the NBA and all its history and records like steroids ruined baseball.

Amen brother
User avatar
BEazy
RealGM
Posts: 10,101
And1: 2,497
Joined: Aug 06, 2010
     

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#350 » by BEazy » Wed Jul 8, 2015 10:29 pm

I'm worried that if DeAndre goes back to the Clippers that the Pacers will say **** it and send Hibbert to the Mavs for Ellis. I'm very concerned about this because Larry might say give us more assets and you can have Hibbert...Going to pay close attention to this situation because ultimately it might **** us over...

My reason to be concerned: DJ signs with the Clippers, Mavs are left with no center. They could just ultimately say Lakers out and just do a swap of Ellis and Hibbert. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but you never know...
Image

Long Live The Black Mamba. Kobe Bean Bryant Laker For Life. 8/24
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,605
And1: 12,319
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#351 » by Kilroy » Wed Jul 8, 2015 10:42 pm

Trades are different than free agent signings. Trades have to be approved by the league. I've never seen a team back out of an agreed upon trade without cause.
Agreeing to sign a contract is different. It's basically just the word of the player. But even then, it's almost unprecedented that a player back out.

What they're really discussing though is a sign and trade... Not trying to change DAJ's mind about leaving.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
xBulletproof
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,881
And1: 5,918
Joined: May 26, 2013
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#352 » by xBulletproof » Wed Jul 8, 2015 11:03 pm

Kilroy wrote:Trades are different than free agent signings. Trades have to be approved by the league. I've never seen a team back out of an agreed upon trade without cause.
Agreeing to sign a contract is different. It's basically just the word of the player. But even then, it's almost unprecedented that a player back out.

What they're really discussing though is a sign and trade... Not trying to change DAJ's mind about leaving.


Pretty sure trades are just agreements until the same time as free agent signings. Teams could still back out.

That said, as a Pacer fan I would be disappointed if we did so. It would be pretty ****ed up.

Either way a sign and trade for Ellis doesn't change anything for us cap wise. There would be no advantage unless they decided to give us a 1st.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,673
And1: 23,988
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#353 » by dockingsched » Wed Jul 8, 2015 11:18 pm

Teams don't back out of trades because the ramifications of it would be very long term. They have to continue dealings with other teams and agents forever.

For players what's the real downside except for public opinion?
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
dipstick
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,920
And1: 218
Joined: Aug 31, 2001
     

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#354 » by dipstick » Wed Jul 8, 2015 11:28 pm

dockingsched wrote:Teams don't back out of trades because the ramifications of it would be very long term. They have to continue dealings with other teams and agents forever.

For players what's the real downside except for public opinion?



For players, reputation when dealing with other teams after this contract runs out. Then again that may be 4 or 5 years down the line and the damage has already been done by now.

Whatever happens, Im happy we didnt get the knucklehead.

We will find out soon enough also as we are rushing tp finish all the deals up so that we can sign Russell his max rookie scale contract. Just wondering why no word is out about the final cap figure.
User avatar
john248
Starter
Posts: 2,367
And1: 651
Joined: Jul 06, 2010
 

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#355 » by john248 » Thu Jul 9, 2015 12:38 am

Slava wrote:If Hibbert had Kwame hands, he'd still be getting paid big bucks for his rim protection alone. It surprises me how much Larry wanted him out that he sent him to us for free.


Given the trends of what we're seeing, how defense only bigs can be played off the court, and Bird wanting a quick rebuild, it can't be that surprising.



dipstick wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Teams don't back out of trades because the ramifications of it would be very long term. They have to continue dealings with other teams and agents forever.

For players what's the real downside except for public opinion?


For players, reputation when dealing with other teams after this contract runs out. Then again that may be 4 or 5 years down the line and the damage has already been done by now.

Whatever happens, Im happy we didnt get the knucklehead.

We will find out soon enough also as we are rushing tp finish all the deals up so that we can sign Russell his max rookie scale contract. Just wondering why no word is out about the final cap figure.


The player's reputation is just short term. If DAJ still puts up high volume numbers, he'll still be sought out in free agency. I know you're thinking that teams won't take him seriously the next time around, but that doesn't apply since we've seen teams over and over bend over backwards to sign a player for reasons worse than changing their mind in free agency.
The Last Word
dipstick
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,920
And1: 218
Joined: Aug 31, 2001
     

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#356 » by dipstick » Thu Jul 9, 2015 1:07 am

john248 wrote:
Slava wrote:If Hibbert had Kwame hands, he'd still be getting paid big bucks for his rim protection alone. It surprises me how much Larry wanted him out that he sent him to us for free.


Given the trends of what we're seeing, how defense only bigs can be played off the court, and Bird wanting a quick rebuild, it can't be that surprising.



dipstick wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Teams don't back out of trades because the ramifications of it would be very long term. They have to continue dealings with other teams and agents forever.

For players what's the real downside except for public opinion?


For players, reputation when dealing with other teams after this contract runs out. Then again that may be 4 or 5 years down the line and the damage has already been done by now.

Whatever happens, Im happy we didnt get the knucklehead.

We will find out soon enough also as we are rushing tp finish all the deals up so that we can sign Russell his max rookie scale contract. Just wondering why no word is out about the final cap figure.


The player's reputation is just short term. If DAJ still puts up high volume numbers, he'll still be sought out in free agency. I know you're thinking that teams won't take him seriously the next time around, but that doesn't apply since we've seen teams over and over bend over backwards to sign a player for reasons worse than changing their mind in free agency.


True, but this will leave a sour taste in teams' mouths. How can you go after a player then find out right before signing that you're screwed. Just like saving space for a rfa. It doesnt happen because of the uncertainty.

This is going to be a horrendous precedent if Jordan resigns with the Clippers. Could lead to teams sabotaging other teams with players reneging on "agreed" terms.
User avatar
Danny Darko
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 18,742
And1: 6,055
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
         

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#357 » by Danny Darko » Thu Jul 9, 2015 1:08 am

oh man Shelburne is also saying on the radio that Cuban might be able to grab Roy if DAJ flip flops... and that the clips aint leaving his house until he signs with them... I would be soo soo pissed.
Image
User avatar
TylersLakers
RealGM
Posts: 10,962
And1: 2,868
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
     

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#358 » by TylersLakers » Thu Jul 9, 2015 1:20 am

Unless Cuban is going to overpay, I doubt that happens. Lakers and Pacers have agreed to a trade. It's not like DeAndre's player decision to back out. This would be an executive backing out.
Image
dipstick
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,920
And1: 218
Joined: Aug 31, 2001
     

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#359 » by dipstick » Thu Jul 9, 2015 1:32 am

If Im Cuban, Im leaving. No sense in getting a no prinicple guy like Jordan. Then plot my revenge.
User avatar
Danny Darko
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 18,742
And1: 6,055
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
         

Re: WE DID IT! (HIBBERT EDITION) 

Post#360 » by Danny Darko » Thu Jul 9, 2015 1:32 am

TylersLakers wrote:Unless Cuban is going to overpay, I doubt that happens. Lakers and Pacers have agreed to a trade. It's not like DeAndre's player decision to back out. This would be an executive backing out.


Celtic HOF laker hater backing out of a Laker deal.
Image

Return to Los Angeles Lakers