ImageImageImageImageImage

2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion

Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy

Who do the Lakers draft on June 22nd with the 2nd overall pick?

Poll ended at Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:11 pm

Lonzo Ball
90
73%
Josh Jackson
33
27%
 
Total votes: 123

RKL
Junior
Posts: 427
And1: 78
Joined: Dec 13, 2012

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#341 » by RKL » Sun May 21, 2017 10:47 am

moonpie wrote:Draft prospect of the day: Bam Adebayo (C, Kentucky)
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Bam-Adebayo-72747/




I like Bam and TJ Leaf. TJ reminds me of a young Chandler Parsons. Oh and Luke Kennard.
BlackieMamba
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 33
Joined: May 17, 2017

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#342 » by BlackieMamba » Sun May 21, 2017 3:29 pm

Draft Night Trade

Lakers: #2, #28 & Luol Deng

Kings: #5 & #10

Why Sacramento Considers It:

1. They're Sacramento.
2. They fall in love with Josh Jackson who certainly won't be available at 5.
3. They fall in love with Ball and the publicity that surrounds him, with the idea of him being the face of their franchise and keeping the Kings relevant.

Why Lakers Consider It:

1. They don't if Boston passes on Fultz, he's way too good of a prospect and they shouldn't hesitate to pick him up if Boston passes.
2. This draft class is deep and moving down takes advantage of that fact.
3. Unload Luol Deng's ridiculous contract.
4. If Ball declines to workout for other teams he may even land to them at #5. But if he doesn't either Tatum or Fox certainly will be available and I believe both have just as high of a ceiling as Lonzo does.
5. The #10 can be used to draft a talented prospect such as; Jonathan Isaac, Ntilikina, Markannen, Zach or John Collins, or the #10 can be packaged with Russell or Randle for PG.

Who declines this offer?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Jkam31
Head Coach
Posts: 6,876
And1: 5,835
Joined: Feb 23, 2014

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#343 » by Jkam31 » Sun May 21, 2017 4:00 pm

trevm37 wrote:
Mirjalovic wrote:
Hank7 wrote:
If Ball is so good, how did Fox lay 39-points on Ball and UCLA in that NCAA tournament Ass whippin? Ball scored like...10-points? I'd pass on Ball. Take Fox Magic.


if Kobe is so good, why some random scrubs lay so-many points on his less than meh of 20 years career ?

really ? watch all full UCLA game and you will understand why Lonzo Ball is so special. In the first 5 minutes you will understand and by the time the game is over you will in awe and ask why you ever question about his ability.


Oh god, its gotten to the point where people are comparing Lonzo to Kobe? gtfo


Were you not outraged by the Kidd comparisons, outrages


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Leor_77
Analyst
Posts: 3,218
And1: 533
Joined: Dec 09, 2010

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#344 » by Leor_77 » Sun May 21, 2017 4:56 pm

I'm not one to usually care what other fans think, but there seems to be many fans from other teams (not just Celtics, but Sixers, Suns, etc. [i.e. teams that could potential get him if we pass on him]) that are not crazy about Ball. This certainly wasn't the case with Ingram and/or Russell (most people were in love with them as prospects).
User avatar
moonpie
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 2,692
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#345 » by moonpie » Sun May 21, 2017 5:40 pm

TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,253
And1: 9,958
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#346 » by TyCobb » Sun May 21, 2017 5:45 pm

LBC in the house. Bell for #28 por favor.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,136
And1: 33,835
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#347 » by Slava » Sun May 21, 2017 6:08 pm

Not even sure how but Luke Kennard shot upto 14th in the mocks.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
XXBKXX
Senior
Posts: 611
And1: 254
Joined: Nov 11, 2016
     

Hamidou Diallo 

Post#348 » by XXBKXX » Sun May 21, 2017 6:23 pm

Hamidou Diallo just posted a 44.5" vert in the draft which is second best of all time which beats Wiggins 44" vert. He's testing the waters in the draft before deciding to play in Kentucky. He's following the Thon Maker loop hole none and done path. Originally he was projected as an early second round now he's showing up as end of first round. With that vert he might be shooting up more. I would LOVE to get him at our 28th pick if he's there. Let him get some D league run and see how he does. Upside is too high. Have a feeling other teams will gamble on him though. Next year he will probably be a top 5 pick if things go as planned. What are your guys thoughts? You think he will be there for us at 28 and do you think we should draft him ? He's an interesting prospect for a SG.

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
BK
-----------------------
Lakers / Angels / Dolphins
User avatar
mcscotty
Rookie
Posts: 1,159
And1: 486
Joined: Mar 04, 2013
Location: Hong Kong
 

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#349 » by mcscotty » Sun May 21, 2017 7:05 pm

Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?
DaddyCool19
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,379
And1: 6,664
Joined: Jul 28, 2013

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#350 » by DaddyCool19 » Sun May 21, 2017 7:34 pm

mcscotty wrote:Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?


I don't think the Knicks would do it.
User avatar
mcscotty
Rookie
Posts: 1,159
And1: 486
Joined: Mar 04, 2013
Location: Hong Kong
 

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#351 » by mcscotty » Sun May 21, 2017 7:58 pm

DaddyCool19 wrote:
mcscotty wrote:Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?


I don't think the Knicks would do it.

I agree. Under normal circumstances, probably not. But their hands could be forced into making a deal that is satisfactory to the aforementioned players. The roster might not be appealing to Anthony, but the destination certainly is. Both these players want nothing to do with the triangle and they would both love to be in LA.
User avatar
AcecardZ
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,770
And1: 541
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Watching the Lakers play basketball...

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#352 » by AcecardZ » Sun May 21, 2017 8:08 pm

mcscotty wrote:Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?


**** no! Carmelo is washed up and Porzingis' body won't hold up! Add to that Kristaps didn't show much improvement over his rookie season.
Sometimes being wrong is awesome!!! :D
User avatar
aaron_gray
Analyst
Posts: 3,665
And1: 979
Joined: Nov 24, 2013

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#353 » by aaron_gray » Sun May 21, 2017 8:20 pm

Is the Maryland Justin Jackson staying in this year's draft
TyCobb wrote:Embiid at peak value after reaching a new maturity level.
User avatar
mcscotty
Rookie
Posts: 1,159
And1: 486
Joined: Mar 04, 2013
Location: Hong Kong
 

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#354 » by mcscotty » Sun May 21, 2017 8:23 pm

AcecardZ wrote:
mcscotty wrote:Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?


**** no! Carmelo is washed up and Porzingis' body won't hold up! Add to that Kristaps didn't show much improvement over his rookie season.


I'm no Melo fan, but we'd get a couple of shooters who can stretch the floor and Melo could snag us something at the trade deadline in his contract year. That's kind of how we could sell it to him. The guy needs to start over professionally and personally. Come out to LA and unwind, if things don't work out, we'll get you on a contender.
User avatar
aaron_gray
Analyst
Posts: 3,665
And1: 979
Joined: Nov 24, 2013

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#355 » by aaron_gray » Sun May 21, 2017 8:25 pm

I also want to add 2 qualifiers to the Houston pick.

a. If you do choose to move Deng (or Mozzy, if possible), given the Lakers lack of draft capital over the next few years, whoever we draft with the Houston pick will most likely have to be thrown in there.

b. The Houston pick will probably not see much playing time.

With those in mind, I would draft whoever has the most potential (maybe Giles if he's available, but anyone who's athletic/long) regardless of past production.
TyCobb wrote:Embiid at peak value after reaching a new maturity level.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,136
And1: 33,835
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#356 » by Slava » Sun May 21, 2017 8:45 pm

aaron_gray wrote:I also want to add 2 qualifiers to the Houston pick.

a. If you do choose to move Deng (or Mozzy, if possible), given the Lakers lack of draft capital over the next few years, whoever we draft with the Houston pick will most likely have to be thrown in there.

b. The Houston pick will probably not see much playing time.

With those in mind, I would draft whoever has the most potential (maybe Giles if he's available, but anyone who's athletic/long) regardless of past production.


Diallo is probably your best bet for that kind of move. I'm not sure if Giles will hold up health wise so anyone drafting him would need to think of the first 4 years as the best production from him.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,823
And1: 4,829
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#357 » by snaquille oatmeal » Sun May 21, 2017 8:58 pm

so I've been watching Fullz highlights on you tube and they show that he has great penetration skills especially in the break, he can also spot up shoot; however, that is it, that is all I see. I can't find highlights of him in the half court sets or pick and rolls etc. is it me or does Lonzo, Fox, and Jackson look like they can do more? what am I not seeing?
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
User avatar
XXBKXX
Senior
Posts: 611
And1: 254
Joined: Nov 11, 2016
     

Re: RE: Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#358 » by XXBKXX » Sun May 21, 2017 9:05 pm

ozymandias818 wrote:
Michael Lucky wrote:
MrWaffles wrote:

That was under old leadership though. Magic/Rob/Luke know what to do.

Ball vs Fox 1-1. Best out of 3. Winner gets to become a Laker.

Ugh I hope we don't evaluate players based on their 1-1 skills.

I don't think we're picking Fox (though if he absolutely destroys him in workouts...). But it'll be nice to bring someone in that wiped the floor with Ball on national television, see if he's learned anything since then and maybe get him a little angry and see how he reacts. His link to Fox isn't going anywhere. I think we take Ball almost regardless of what happens, but I also think it's a win-win for LA to put Lonzo up against him in any capacity they can.

This just shows why Lonzo needs a real agent and not let Lavar run things. He should let Lavar run the promotional business side but hire a real agent to take care of the basketball business area. If Lonzo really wants to be a Laker, playing D'aron Fox, in a publicized one on one match is not the way to go. Lonzo has more to lose than fox does. Any half witt agent knows this is a bad move for Lonzo. This is just Lavar's pride with his dad goggles on thinking no one is better than his son.

Fox has next level quickness that would probably kill in a one on one workout. One of Lonzos strengths (passing, making teammates better) isn't visible in a one on one. Lavar is going to mismanage his son out of millions of dollars and it's a shame -- he already did it with the shoe endorsements. If I'm in Lonzos camp, I tell him no work-outs and only do interviews. Don't even pick up the phone until two weeks before the draft. Theres enough footage out there on Lonzo to get him in the top two pick. Only thing he can do right now is hurt his draft spot.

This is all from Lonzos perspective obviously. Now if you're the Lakers, you would love to get Lonzo and Fox workout against each other. It's just hard for me to imagine someone letting this happen from Lonzos side. It's just such a bad decision.





Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
BK
-----------------------
Lakers / Angels / Dolphins
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,160
And1: 6,803
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#359 » by Michael Lucky » Sun May 21, 2017 10:08 pm

snaquille oatmeal wrote:so I've been watching Fullz highlights on you tube and they show that he has great penetration skills especially in the break, he can also spot up shoot; however, that is it, that is all I see. I can't find highlights of him in the half court sets or pick and rolls etc. is it me or does Lonzo, Fox, and Jackson look like they can do more? what am I not seeing?

You are watching the wrong YouTube tapes. The pick n rolls are one of his strengths among many. He also prefers shooting off the dribble so again not sure which tapes you are looking at. Besides you don't average 23ppg just on catch and shoots and transitions. You don't get that many opportunities to score that much.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,136
And1: 33,835
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition 

Post#360 » by Slava » Sun May 21, 2017 10:11 pm

Michael Lucky wrote:
snaquille oatmeal wrote:so I've been watching Fullz highlights on you tube and they show that he has great penetration skills especially in the break, he can also spot up shoot; however, that is it, that is all I see. I can't find highlights of him in the half court sets or pick and rolls etc. is it me or does Lonzo, Fox, and Jackson look like they can do more? what am I not seeing?

You are watching the wrong YouTube tapes. The pick n rolls are one of his strengths among many.


He's a lot like D'Angelo Russell with less subtlety and more leaping ability. He actually shot poorer than Russell in college, which is why it makes me laugh when people suggest Russell is a bust and Fultz is the second coming.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:

Return to Los Angeles Lakers