moonpie wrote:Draft prospect of the day: Bam Adebayo (C, Kentucky)
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Bam-Adebayo-72747/
I like Bam and TJ Leaf. TJ reminds me of a young Chandler Parsons. Oh and Luke Kennard.
Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy
moonpie wrote:Draft prospect of the day: Bam Adebayo (C, Kentucky)
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Bam-Adebayo-72747/
trevm37 wrote:Mirjalovic wrote:Hank7 wrote:
If Ball is so good, how did Fox lay 39-points on Ball and UCLA in that NCAA tournament Ass whippin? Ball scored like...10-points? I'd pass on Ball. Take Fox Magic.
if Kobe is so good, why some random scrubs lay so-many points on his less than meh of 20 years career ?
really ? watch all full UCLA game and you will understand why Lonzo Ball is so special. In the first 5 minutes you will understand and by the time the game is over you will in awe and ask why you ever question about his ability.
Oh god, its gotten to the point where people are comparing Lonzo to Kobe? gtfo


+
=
mcscotty wrote:Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?
DaddyCool19 wrote:mcscotty wrote:Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?
I don't think the Knicks would do it.
mcscotty wrote:Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?
TyCobb wrote:Embiid at peak value after reaching a new maturity level.
AcecardZ wrote:mcscotty wrote:Would you trade the #2 and #28 and Deng for Porzingis and Anthony?
**** no! Carmelo is washed up and Porzingis' body won't hold up! Add to that Kristaps didn't show much improvement over his rookie season.
TyCobb wrote:Embiid at peak value after reaching a new maturity level.

aaron_gray wrote:I also want to add 2 qualifiers to the Houston pick.
a. If you do choose to move Deng (or Mozzy, if possible), given the Lakers lack of draft capital over the next few years, whoever we draft with the Houston pick will most likely have to be thrown in there.
b. The Houston pick will probably not see much playing time.
With those in mind, I would draft whoever has the most potential (maybe Giles if he's available, but anyone who's athletic/long) regardless of past production.
+
= 
ozymandias818 wrote:Michael Lucky wrote:MrWaffles wrote:
That was under old leadership though. Magic/Rob/Luke know what to do.
Ball vs Fox 1-1. Best out of 3. Winner gets to become a Laker.
Ugh I hope we don't evaluate players based on their 1-1 skills.
I don't think we're picking Fox (though if he absolutely destroys him in workouts...). But it'll be nice to bring someone in that wiped the floor with Ball on national television, see if he's learned anything since then and maybe get him a little angry and see how he reacts. His link to Fox isn't going anywhere. I think we take Ball almost regardless of what happens, but I also think it's a win-win for LA to put Lonzo up against him in any capacity they can.
snaquille oatmeal wrote:so I've been watching Fullz highlights on you tube and they show that he has great penetration skills especially in the break, he can also spot up shoot; however, that is it, that is all I see. I can't find highlights of him in the half court sets or pick and rolls etc. is it me or does Lonzo, Fox, and Jackson look like they can do more? what am I not seeing?

Michael Lucky wrote:snaquille oatmeal wrote:so I've been watching Fullz highlights on you tube and they show that he has great penetration skills especially in the break, he can also spot up shoot; however, that is it, that is all I see. I can't find highlights of him in the half court sets or pick and rolls etc. is it me or does Lonzo, Fox, and Jackson look like they can do more? what am I not seeing?
You are watching the wrong YouTube tapes. The pick n rolls are one of his strengths among many.
+
=