Cody Martin for PJ Tucker, rights to swap 2030 2nds
Clippers shave off $3M from their books and duck the luxury tax entirely. Charlotte gets some depth at the 4 and a very very very minor asset.
CHA/LAC bite sized trade
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
CHA/LAC bite sized trade
-
HornetJail
- RealGM
- Posts: 46,440
- And1: 14,186
- Joined: Feb 05, 2012
-
CHA/LAC bite sized trade
investigate Adam Silver
Re: CHA/LAC bite sized trade
-
jayjaysee
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,868
- And1: 7,830
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: CHA/LAC bite sized trade
This feels like a great trade for LAC, probably worth it without the second coming back really..
Though the Clips need a four a lot more than CLT does, so really should be looking at any option.
Think Ballmer might take on the extra two years of Grant Williams contract for free just to get a body..
Though the Clips need a four a lot more than CLT does, so really should be looking at any option.
Think Ballmer might take on the extra two years of Grant Williams contract for free just to get a body..
Re: CHA/LAC bite sized trade
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,822
- And1: 35,909
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: CHA/LAC bite sized trade
I mean Tucker isn't playable anymore. Charlotte should get that second outright IMO.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions