Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,708
And1: 99,194
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#1 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Sep 25, 2021 6:11 pm

Former poster, DocRI had a great series for dead periods like this that he called the Rolling Trade Challenge. I'm essentially stealing his idea, but making it less formal without a voting process or a "winner". Just would like to present something on a much smaller scale than the current 1/4 pole blockbusters for anyone interested.

This first challenge involves the Timberwolves. Long stretch of mediocrity interrupted only by the one Jimmy Butler year,and just had to fire their GM under a cloud of issues. New governors are on their way which should bring some hope, but they need more and need it now.

They have some talent in Towns and Edwards and to a lessor degree I suppose Beasley and Russell. Our Wolves fanbase are also super excited about the potential of McDaniels and maybe as soon as this year.

So my challenge to you is to bring in a legit starting-caliber forward to plug right into the starting lineup without trading any of Towns, Edwards, or McDaniels.

The aim here is realism. Giannis would be amazing obviously. Or Tatum. This isn't about imagining a scenario where that happens. This is hopefully anyway about a player who could conceivably be had who is good and complements their existing core.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,140
And1: 11,934
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#2 » by eminence » Sat Sep 25, 2021 6:17 pm

Think Memphis could be a partner. Anderson could be valued a bit higher than MIN would like to pay, but could work. I’d like Clarke as a low risk play.

Maybe there’s a super funny 3 team trade with Wiggins/Dlo involved.

Edit: on 2nd thought, KAT might kill Wiggins, so there’s nothing there
I bought a boat.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 21,074
And1: 7,980
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#3 » by jayjaysee » Sat Sep 25, 2021 6:35 pm

Might belong in the Simmons thread but what about;

Beasley, Prince, small value (strongly protected first or Reid) for Barnes and Bagley

Simmons ends up in Sacramento. Minnesota hopes for Bagley development, but adds a great fitting Barnes.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,860
And1: 5,941
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#4 » by psman2 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 6:53 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Might belong in the Simmons thread but what about;

Beasley, Prince, small value (strongly protected first or Reid) for Barnes and Bagley

Simmons ends up in Sacramento. Minnesota hopes for Bagley development, but adds a great fitting Barnes.


I guess it depends on what the rest of the Simmons deal looks like, I could see Philly preferring Barnes over Beasley in some scenarios and Beasley in others.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,860
And1: 5,941
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#5 » by psman2 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 6:59 pm

eminence wrote:Think Memphis could be a partner. Anderson could be valued a bit higher than MIN would like to pay, but could work. I’d like Clarke as a low risk play.

Maybe there’s a super funny 3 team trade with Wiggins/Dlo involved.

Edit: on 2nd thought, KAT might kill Wiggins, so there’s nothing there


Memphis could do something like Anderson and the worst of the Utah/LAL 1st for the Minny top 10 protected 1st. If Minny thinks they are a playoff team then they are giving up a pick at 15+ for Anderson and a pick that is likely 25+.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,506
And1: 17,973
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#6 » by babyjax13 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 8:08 pm

Beasley for Kyle Anderson + Brandon Clarke
Minnesota gets a starting caliber combo forward and a power forward prospect who could be a nice fit next to Simmons. Memphis gets a young-enough volume scorer + shooter.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,140
And1: 11,934
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#7 » by eminence » Sat Sep 25, 2021 8:12 pm

babyjax13 wrote:Beasley for Kyle Anderson + Brandon Clarke
Minnesota gets a starting caliber combo forward and a power forward prospect who could be a nice fit next to Simmons. Memphis gets a young-enough volume scorer + shooter.


Leave out Clarke (may need some other filler), and I could see it as a decent positional need swap. I don't get why Memphis would add the extra useful guy when they're already sending out the best player in the deal (Anderson).
I bought a boat.
Mamba4Goat
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 11,769
And1: 8,078
Joined: Dec 13, 2013
     

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#8 » by Mamba4Goat » Sat Sep 25, 2021 8:47 pm

I think something like…

Okogie+Layman+2nds for either Boucher or JaMychal Green (once he can be traded)
Prince plus a not small but not large asset (more than 2nds, less than a first—maybe a pick swap?) for Thad Young
Layman and 2nds for House (may be too small)

Are a few realistic-ish options. Minnesota could serve well to be a third team in a few potential Thad Young/Ben Simmons trades too. Should should Portland do Simmons for CJ+picks Minnesota could swoop in with a Beasley for Covington type trade. Similarly if Phoenix gets Thad Young and wants to potentially cut long term salary Okogie+Layman+2nds for Crowder could be plausible.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,297
And1: 14,192
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#9 » by Godaddycurse » Sat Sep 25, 2021 8:59 pm

Mamba4Goat wrote:I think something like…

Okogie+Layman+2nds for either Boucher or JaMychal Green (once he can be traded)
Prince plus a not small but not large asset (more than 2nds, less than a first—maybe a pick swap?) for Thad Young
Layman and 2nds for House (may be too small)

Are a few realistic-ish options. Minnesota could serve well to be a third team in a few potential Thad Young/Ben Simmons trades too. Should should Portland do Simmons for CJ+picks Minnesota could swoop in with a Beasley for Covington type trade. Similarly if Phoenix gets Thad Young and wants to potentially cut long term salary Okogie+Layman+2nds for Crowder could be plausible.


Dont think masai will dump boucher for 2 seconds and scraps. I find it odd you value him and house similarly when boucher was a much more productive player last year
Mamba4Goat
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 11,769
And1: 8,078
Joined: Dec 13, 2013
     

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#10 » by Mamba4Goat » Sat Sep 25, 2021 9:08 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:
Mamba4Goat wrote:I think something like…

Okogie+Layman+2nds for either Boucher or JaMychal Green (once he can be traded)
Prince plus a not small but not large asset (more than 2nds, less than a first—maybe a pick swap?) for Thad Young
Layman and 2nds for House (may be too small)

Are a few realistic-ish options. Minnesota could serve well to be a third team in a few potential Thad Young/Ben Simmons trades too. Should should Portland do Simmons for CJ+picks Minnesota could swoop in with a Beasley for Covington type trade. Similarly if Phoenix gets Thad Young and wants to potentially cut long term salary Okogie+Layman+2nds for Crowder could be plausible.


Dont think masai will dump boucher for 2 seconds and scraps. I find it odd you value him and house similarly when boucher was a much more productive player last year

Sorry—I was a little vague on “2nds” (didn’t want minor value tinkering to take away from the ideas). I think House and Boucher are roughly a Josh Okogie and a 2nd apart in terms of trade value though.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 21,074
And1: 7,980
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#11 » by jayjaysee » Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:07 pm

Minnesota has the tax space to offer Layman+Okogie for Kuzmaz

I don’t really have Kuzma as positive value but I don’t have Minnesota’s package as very valuable either. Either team could say they are owed a second or two and I wouldn’t care.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,126
And1: 4,607
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#12 » by wolves_89 » Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:25 am

jayjaysee wrote:Minnesota has the tax space to offer Layman+Okogie for Kuzmaz

I don’t really have Kuzma as positive value but I don’t have Minnesota’s package as very valuable either. Either team could say they are owed a second or two and I wouldn’t care.


The Wolves have less than $1M in space under the luxury tax line and trading Layman+Okogie for Kuzma adds $5M. I can't see Minnesota going over the luxury tax line for Kuzma.
DoItALL9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,935
And1: 1,345
Joined: Oct 08, 2016
       

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#13 » by DoItALL9 » Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:32 am

If Minnesota believed in Marvin Bagley going forward as a 3 or 4 next to Towns he could be a potential get.

The ask shouldn't be much from Sacramento. I wouldn't be surprised by a couple of seconds, or a future highly protected first, or Okogie or something like that at this point.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,712
And1: 43,980
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#14 » by zimpy27 » Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:26 am

Realistically the best 4 that the Wolves could have is one that can anchor and lead a defense for their side.. They don't need a 4 to come in that will take too many shots away from KAT either.

Vanderbilt is actually a decent option for them and I haven't really seen a significantly better option so far in this thread.

Isaac is the best fit and I think he could be a realistic get.
Isaac for Prince+Nowell+MIN22FRP+MIN24FRP

Magic have Wagner and Okeke coming through and they are still in the market to rebuild through draft. The 2 FRPs helps them and Nowell is a nice young SG prospect. Prince fills a 1 year gap at SF where they currently only have Ross.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,526
And1: 6,600
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#15 » by shangrila » Sun Sep 26, 2021 5:10 am

zimpy27 wrote:Realistically the best 4 that the Wolves could have is one that can anchor and lead a defense for their side.. They don't need a 4 to come in that will take too many shots away from KAT either.

Vanderbilt is actually a decent option for them and I haven't really seen a significantly better option so far in this thread.

Isaac is the best fit and I think he could be a realistic get.
Isaac for Prince+Nowell+MIN22FRP+MIN24FRP

Magic have Wagner and Okeke coming through and they are still in the market to rebuild through draft. The 2 FRPs helps them and Nowell is a nice young SG prospect. Prince fills a 1 year gap at SF where they currently only have Ross.

Isaac is untradeable. Not because he has no value but because no team is going to pay actual price given his injury history and the Magic aren't going to sell low on one of their best players.
SmokeyPaw
Starter
Posts: 2,207
And1: 1,163
Joined: May 14, 2016
 

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#16 » by SmokeyPaw » Sun Sep 26, 2021 7:38 pm

shangrila wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Realistically the best 4 that the Wolves could have is one that can anchor and lead a defense for their side.. They don't need a 4 to come in that will take too many shots away from KAT either.

Vanderbilt is actually a decent option for them and I haven't really seen a significantly better option so far in this thread.

Isaac is the best fit and I think he could be a realistic get.
Isaac for Prince+Nowell+MIN22FRP+MIN24FRP

Magic have Wagner and Okeke coming through and they are still in the market to rebuild through draft. The 2 FRPs helps them and Nowell is a nice young SG prospect. Prince fills a 1 year gap at SF where they currently only have Ross.

Isaac is untradeable. Not because he has no value but because no team is going to pay actual price given his injury history and the Magic aren't going to sell low on one of their best players.


My understanding that he wont get vaccinated. As a result he may not be able to play in certain cities (NY, SF, LA?). Posssbly not a big problem for a team thats not expected to compete for the playoffs. But likely a big problem for a playoff bound team.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,140
And1: 11,934
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#17 » by eminence » Sun Sep 26, 2021 8:21 pm

SmokeyPaw wrote:
shangrila wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Realistically the best 4 that the Wolves could have is one that can anchor and lead a defense for their side.. They don't need a 4 to come in that will take too many shots away from KAT either.

Vanderbilt is actually a decent option for them and I haven't really seen a significantly better option so far in this thread.

Isaac is the best fit and I think he could be a realistic get.
Isaac for Prince+Nowell+MIN22FRP+MIN24FRP

Magic have Wagner and Okeke coming through and they are still in the market to rebuild through draft. The 2 FRPs helps them and Nowell is a nice young SG prospect. Prince fills a 1 year gap at SF where they currently only have Ross.

Isaac is untradeable. Not because he has no value but because no team is going to pay actual price given his injury history and the Magic aren't going to sell low on one of their best players.


My understanding that he wont get vaccinated. As a result he may not be able to play in certain cities (NY, SF, LA?). Posssbly not a big problem for a team thats not expected to compete for the playoffs. But likely a big problem for a playoff bound team.


As of currently I believe road players can play in all cities except possibly Toronto? It's the home players who can't play in NYC/SF.
I bought a boat.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,712
And1: 43,980
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#18 » by zimpy27 » Sun Sep 26, 2021 8:31 pm

eminence wrote:
SmokeyPaw wrote:
shangrila wrote:Isaac is untradeable. Not because he has no value but because no team is going to pay actual price given his injury history and the Magic aren't going to sell low on one of their best players.


My understanding that he wont get vaccinated. As a result he may not be able to play in certain cities (NY, SF, LA?). Posssbly not a big problem for a team thats not expected to compete for the playoffs. But likely a big problem for a playoff bound team.


As of currently I believe road players can play in all cities except possibly Toronto? It's the home players who can't play in NYC/SF.


Is it just home players? Where does it say that? That doesn't really make sense
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 45,032
And1: 14,316
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#19 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Sep 26, 2021 8:47 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
eminence wrote:
SmokeyPaw wrote:
My understanding that he wont get vaccinated. As a result he may not be able to play in certain cities (NY, SF, LA?). Posssbly not a big problem for a team thats not expected to compete for the playoffs. But likely a big problem for a playoff bound team.


As of currently I believe road players can play in all cities except possibly Toronto? It's the home players who can't play in NYC/SF.


Is it just home players? Where does it say that? That doesn't really make sense


In GS that is the case, it’s been reported. Part of it is simply the ability for the state to legislate what it’s local employers can do, not what employers from out of state and wanting to avoid that inevitable lawsuit. Though I’m sure they’ll still get filed suit.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,712
And1: 43,980
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Non-Rolling Trade Challenge -- Forward Thinking in Minnesota 

Post#20 » by zimpy27 » Sun Sep 26, 2021 9:02 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
eminence wrote:
As of currently I believe road players can play in all cities except possibly Toronto? It's the home players who can't play in NYC/SF.


Is it just home players? Where does it say that? That doesn't really make sense


In GS that is the case, it’s been reported. Part of it is simply the ability for the state to legislate what it’s local employers can do, not what employers from out of state and wanting to avoid that inevitable lawsuit. Though I’m sure they’ll still get filed suit.


Do you have a link? Trying to find commentary on this.

Does that mean interstate fans can come into the stadium unvaccinated too?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie

Return to Trades and Transactions