Brooklyn - Toronto
Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck
Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,763
- And1: 13,721
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Brooklyn - Toronto
Brooklyn trade: Johnson, Wolf
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,912
- And1: 4,486
- Joined: Dec 16, 2014
- Contact:
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
I don’t get it, from the Raps pov. Cam Johnson won’t get much playing time at the 3 or 4.
Raps have Ingram, Scottie, CMB, Mogbo, Ochai, Gradey all vying for minutes at the 3&4.
Feels like an RJ Barrett move just for the sake of it.
Raps have Ingram, Scottie, CMB, Mogbo, Ochai, Gradey all vying for minutes at the 3&4.
Feels like an RJ Barrett move just for the sake of it.
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,763
- And1: 13,721
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
MessiahUjiri wrote:I don’t get it, from the Raps pov. Cam Johnson won’t get much playing time at the 3 or 4.
Raps have Ingram, Scottie, CMB, Mogbo, Ochai, Gradey all vying for minutes at the 3&4.
Feels like an RJ Barrett move just for the sake of it.
Upgrades our spacing and bench production, fills backup C hole and keeps us out of tax this and next year (gives us room to re-sign poeltl and agbaji)
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,767
- And1: 4,041
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
Raps are already pretty stack at the forward spot, no? Cam Jo is a better floor spacer than the others, but still
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 6,816
- And1: 8,180
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
MessiahUjiri wrote:I don’t get it, from the Raps pov. Cam Johnson won’t get much playing time at the 3 or 4.
Raps have Ingram, Scottie, CMB, Mogbo, Ochai, Gradey all vying for minutes at the 3&4.
Feels like an RJ Barrett move just for the sake of it.
Agree
I also have absolutely no idea how well Wolf will be in the NBA. As a Michigan alum, I always catch a few UM Bball games, and Wolf is one of the most confounding prospects I've ever followed on the Wolverines. He has skills that should translate, including great passing vision, and he could be a surprise hit. OTOH he may very well not have enough athleticism to hang in the league at all. I just don't know.
I'm still thinking the best move for TOR to stop digging a hole is to flip BI at the TDL
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 756
- And1: 761
- Joined: May 06, 2007
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
Godaddycurse wrote:Brooklyn trade: Johnson, Wolf
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
2 best assets in the deal are from the Raps. Easy pass.
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,763
- And1: 13,721
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
bobbyp3588 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Brooklyn trade: Johnson, Wolf
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
2 best assets in the deal are from the Raps. Easy pass.
Nah Barrett is the worst asset in this deal
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,419
- And1: 2,818
- Joined: Feb 11, 2007
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
I don't get Wolf's inclusion. Nets are trading a valuable player and taking on slightly negative salary, while only getting one pick, yet they need to kick back a just drafted player?
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,710
- And1: 5,455
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
Godaddycurse wrote:Brooklyn trade: Johnson, Wolf
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
If the 1st is unprotected the Nets say yes for sure. There's a good chance the Raptors are bad next year. If it's protected, there's no way the Nets do it.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 756
- And1: 761
- Joined: May 06, 2007
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
Godaddycurse wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Brooklyn trade: Johnson, Wolf
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
2 best assets in the deal are from the Raps. Easy pass.
Nah Barrett is the worst asset in this deal
Nope.
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,763
- And1: 13,721
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
TheNetsFan wrote:I don't get Wolf's inclusion. Nets are trading a valuable player and taking on slightly negative salary, while only getting one pick, yet they need to kick back a just drafted player?
Hea included because i think unprotected 1st + barrett > johnson, or at least the consensus is johnson wouldnt fetch high variance pick normally/otherwise in the other OKC threads
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,419
- And1: 2,818
- Joined: Feb 11, 2007
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
Variance is greatly overrated on this board, especially for a pick one season out. If the Raptors want Johnson, they need to put at least a first on the table. If they're afraid they'll implode, put some light protection that rolls over for multiple years. If you don't want to have your tradeable draft picks tied up for multiple years, don't protect it and live with the outcome.
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,453
- And1: 3,000
- Joined: Jun 29, 2021
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
Godaddycurse wrote:Brooklyn trade: Johnson, Wolf
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
Is that pick unprotected? Why do you do this to us?
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,763
- And1: 13,721
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
wegotthabeet wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Brooklyn trade: Johnson, Wolf
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
Is that pick unprotected? Why do you do this to us?
Yes, i think we can make playoffs in the east/the new FO isnt going to tank anyways. I think webster and Tolzman will try their hardest to win to secure a promotion
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 6,816
- And1: 8,180
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
Godaddycurse wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Brooklyn trade: Johnson, Wolf
Toronto trade: Barrett, TOR 2026 1st
Why for Toronto: Playoff push. Ownership doesn't want to tank anymore.. Wolf theoretically should fit well with CMB on the bench + Toronto liked him during the predraft process
Why for Brooklyn: get a high variance 1st for Johnson unlike the other offers we see
Poeltl/Wolf
Johnson/CMB
Barnes/Dick
Ingram/Agbaji
IQ/Shead
2 best assets in the deal are from the Raps. Easy pass.
Nah Barrett is the worst asset in this deal
Wolf is a better asset than Barrett? I feel like the valuations of Barrett have jumped the shark
Look, I get scepticism about Barrett's statistical improvement as a starter in TOR. It could be all empty stats. Too much tanking and injuries. He's spent so much time playing beside rookies and GLeaguers, and every position except C, that it is impossible to know if his jumps in efficiency and D will translate to playing as a 4th option in the starting line-up. But just like I don't think we can project from his 100 or so games starting in TOR, I don't think we can completely ignore that time either. We also shouldn't ignore that, on a CMNT (with SGA, Brooks, Dort, Murray and Nembhard) RJ Barrett was arguably the second best player in 2 successive summers of international competition.
If Barrett is as negative as perceptions on this board are, might as well wait until next off-season to trade him as he will be cheaper to move when he is on an expiring contract.
I'd still rather flip BI at the TDL -- hopefully after recouping some value better than the late FRP he cost.
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,677
- And1: 35,740
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
bobbyp3588 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:
2 best assets in the deal are from the Raps. Easy pass.
Nah Barrett is the worst asset in this deal
Nope.
The Raptors just shopped him and found no takers.
Raptors Are Reportedly Shopping Veteran Guard https://share.google/c3vnxW6BXxmNTy4MM
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,415
- And1: 3,706
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
jbk1234 wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
Nah Barrett is the worst asset in this deal
Nope.
The Raptors just shopped him and found no takers.
Raptors Are Reportedly Shopping Veteran Guard https://share.google/c3vnxW6BXxmNTy4MM
Where in the article does it say that no teams are interested?
Seems like you just made that up and then pasted a random article



Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,677
- And1: 35,740
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
Thaddy wrote:jbk1234 wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:
Nope.
The Raptors just shopped him and found no takers.
Raptors Are Reportedly Shopping Veteran Guard https://share.google/c3vnxW6BXxmNTy4MM
Where in the article does it say that no teams are interested?
He's still on the roster.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,763
- And1: 13,721
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
oldncreaky wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:
2 best assets in the deal are from the Raps. Easy pass.
Nah Barrett is the worst asset in this deal
Wolf is a better asset than Barrett? I feel like the valuations of Barrett have jumped the shark
Look, I get scepticism about Barrett's statistical improvement as a starter in TOR. It could be all empty stats. Too much tanking and injuries. He's spent so much time playing beside rookies and GLeaguers, and every position except C, that it is impossible to know if his jumps in efficiency and D will translate to playing as a 4th option in the starting line-up. But just like I don't think we can project from his 100 or so games starting in TOR, I don't think we can completely ignore that time either. We also shouldn't ignore that, on a CMNT (with SGA, Brooks, Dort, Murray and Nembhard) RJ Barrett was arguably the second best player in 2 successive summers of international competition.
If Barrett is as negative as perceptions on this board are, might as well wait until next off-season to trade him as he will be cheaper to move when he is on an expiring contract.
I'd still rather flip BI at the TDL -- hopefully after recouping some value better than the late FRP he cost.
Wolf didnt get a chance to go on the court depreciate yet

Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,415
- And1: 3,706
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Re: Brooklyn - Toronto
jbk1234 wrote:Thaddy wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
The Raptors just shopped him and found no takers.
Raptors Are Reportedly Shopping Veteran Guard https://share.google/c3vnxW6BXxmNTy4MM
Where in the article does it say that no teams are interested?
He's still on the roster.
You stated some random opinion, pasted a random article from MSN lol. Then you double down. Nice.
Return to Trades and Transactions