BFRESH44 wrote:And it's not about "excepeting they're not going to the playoffs"
It's about wanting to see some type of direction and momentum that can be caried onto next season..
This is some serious losing going on. Like we were a Kareem Rush three ball late from possibly losing 27 straight. That's some serious futilty. Historical futility.
Also on the lottery, look at recent lottery history and see how many times the single worst team has had the number 1 spot. Very few times...You want to be in that 3rd worst category.
Hell Portland had the 7TH worst record, and ended up having number 1 last year.
You want to be in 3rd worst, 4th worst range...Adds up better.

I agree with you on the idea of losing, it's fun to do the 'Going Streaking' thread here and cheer for the loss, but I really do hope the team isn't doing it that way (although it also sucks hard if they actually are this bad) because you see the organisations that tolerate tanking (like Boston) take years to build up that winning mentality again.
But the whole thing about the worst record, and not getting good picks is like a
Gamblers Fallacy. At the end of the day, worst pick = best chance at top pick, and not being any worse than 4th, which is great news in a draft with at least 4 really good prospects.
The worst record in the league has yielded in the 14 drafts since '93 (when the league did the weightings on the ball after Orlando got consecutive 1st picks):
1st pick: 2 times
2nd pick: 6 times
3rd pick: 2 times
4th pick: 4 times
Or for the sake of this draft, with 2 top prospects seemingly in Rose and Beasley
Worst record: 8 top 2 picks
Second worst record: 3 top 2 picks
Third worst record: 5 top 2 picks
Fourth worst record: 2 top 2 picks
Fifth worst record: 5 top 2 picks
Sixth worst record: 3 top 2 picks
Seventh worst record: 1 top 2 pick
Eighth worst record: 1 top 2 pick
So if you want a top 2 pick in the draft, both historically and mathematically, your best chance is to be the worst team.