ImageImageImage

Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread

Moderators: KingDavid, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ, heat4life

contract
RealGM
Posts: 13,969
And1: 23,804
Joined: Jan 11, 2009
Location: on your last nerve
 

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#581 » by contract » Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:09 am

HeatGuyInChicago wrote:I blame Riley and Wade. They both have regret.

Pat is smoking a Cuban cigar, drinking Champagne, and laughing maniacally as "Bitch better have my money" plays on a loop.
.
:meditate:
contract
RealGM
Posts: 13,969
And1: 23,804
Joined: Jan 11, 2009
Location: on your last nerve
 

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#582 » by contract » Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:13 am

gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)

I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:

http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278

In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.

Pat just ran Wade off so he'd have money to go whale hunting. I'm expecting whales.
.
:meditate:
User avatar
Shewasfly
General Manager
Posts: 8,332
And1: 14,133
Joined: Aug 05, 2014
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#583 » by Shewasfly » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:08 am

QUIZ wrote:
gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)

I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:

http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278

In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.

What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.

Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.

Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.

Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y

Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.

IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.


Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.

Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.
Image
Saudades.
User avatar
Hallstar
Head Coach
Posts: 6,827
And1: 7,784
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#584 » by Hallstar » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:23 am

contract wrote:
gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)

I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:

http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278

In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.

Pat just ran Wade off so he'd have money to go whale hunting. I'm expecting whales.

Thank you.

If we don't get Westbrook, that's the 4th year of off season failure
User avatar
QUIZ
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 32,014
And1: 78,769
Joined: Feb 02, 2014
Location: South Florida
Contact:
 

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#585 » by QUIZ » Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:19 am

Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.

Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.

Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.

Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.
Don’t let us get one. — Nikola Jovic

Dru Smith very lucky he got that 500k this year. He should invest and manage a subway after all this-MettaWorldPanda
unowen85
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,558
And1: 2,840
Joined: Jul 01, 2003
Location: Maryland
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#586 » by unowen85 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:12 am

Wade's belief is greater than your doubt.
For a long time it gave me nightmares,witnessing an injustice like that.It’s a constant reminder of just how unfair this world can be.I can still hear them taunting him, Silly Rabbit tricks are for kids.I mean why couldn’t they just give him some cereal?
User avatar
Hallstar
Head Coach
Posts: 6,827
And1: 7,784
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#587 » by Hallstar » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:16 pm

QUIZ wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.

Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.

Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.

Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.

The lowest per since his rookie season was 3rd among SGs though :lol:

Riley owes us a superstar if Wade is who would "hold us back"
User avatar
gom
Heat forum: Expert Predictor
Posts: 18,634
And1: 42,766
Joined: May 30, 2014
Location: Earth-616
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#588 » by gom » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:21 pm

QUIZ wrote:
gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)

I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:

http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278

In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.

What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.

Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.

Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.

Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y

Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.

IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.


I definitely agree his productivity would have likely dived if not this year, then next year. I also believe, however, that we're not winning anything soon anyway, so his production is hardly an issue anyhow.

Riley wants to win now. I understand his motivation. He's at the end of his career too, and he also has the same "special motivation" that Lebron has, right?

Now that the Kobe retirement tour is done I think you're seeing a different take by Laker's fans, a feeling of pride. Also their team has a good future (not saying ours doesn't.)
Image
I remember 11-30 with these guys. ^
contract
RealGM
Posts: 13,969
And1: 23,804
Joined: Jan 11, 2009
Location: on your last nerve
 

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#589 » by contract » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:49 pm

Hallstar wrote:
contract wrote:
gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)

I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:

http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278

In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.

Pat just ran Wade off so he'd have money to go whale hunting. I'm expecting whales.

Thank you.

If we don't get Westbrook, that's the 4th year of off season failure

Signing Westbrook would mean having to flip Dragic for another star player. Westbrook and Whiteside alone aren't winning anything.
.
:meditate:
User avatar
Hallstar
Head Coach
Posts: 6,827
And1: 7,784
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#590 » by Hallstar » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:50 pm

contract wrote:
Hallstar wrote:
contract wrote:Pat just ran Wade off so he'd have money to go whale hunting. I'm expecting whales.

Thank you.

If we don't get Westbrook, that's the 4th year of off season failure

Signing Westbrook would mean having to flip Dragic for another star player. Westbrook and Whiteside alone aren't winning anything.


Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming
contract
RealGM
Posts: 13,969
And1: 23,804
Joined: Jan 11, 2009
Location: on your last nerve
 

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#591 » by contract » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:13 pm

Hallstar wrote:
contract wrote:
Hallstar wrote:Thank you.

If we don't get Westbrook, that's the 4th year of off season failure

Signing Westbrook would mean having to flip Dragic for another star player. Westbrook and Whiteside alone aren't winning anything.


Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming

Pat wouldn't make the trade without assurances from Westbrook that he'd re-sign here. Besides, I don't think we have any picks that we can trade anytime soon.
.
:meditate:
User avatar
Hallstar
Head Coach
Posts: 6,827
And1: 7,784
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#592 » by Hallstar » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:22 pm

contract wrote:
Hallstar wrote:
contract wrote:Signing Westbrook would mean having to flip Dragic for another star player. Westbrook and Whiteside alone aren't winning anything.


Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming

Pat wouldn't make the trade without assurances from Westbrook that he'd re-sign here.

Well, we know what assurances are worth these days
User avatar
KingDavid
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 31,558
And1: 41,142
Joined: Sep 04, 2013
       

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#593 » by KingDavid » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:49 pm

Shewasfly wrote:
QUIZ wrote:
gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)

I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:

http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278

In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.

What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.

Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.

Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.

Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y

Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.

IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.


Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.

Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

How many of them had their Mcl removed in college? The reason why Wade's minutes are low at this age has a lot to do with injury.

Maybe he gets a great 3pt shot and plays pg down the line? That could extend his career. That could have helped years ago...he's always been a great leader. All the damage comes from landing.

Mj playing sf is a strawman. Kobe played sf one year as well.

I've seen examples of it from players in their 30s. You crash and burn around that age as a professional athlete. Wade's iq is really high though. I think he makes another adjustment in his game.
#HEATLifer

Long Live Kobe Bryant. My idol's idol.
User avatar
KingDavid
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 31,558
And1: 41,142
Joined: Sep 04, 2013
       

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#594 » by KingDavid » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:50 pm

Hallstar wrote:
contract wrote:
Hallstar wrote:
Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming

Pat wouldn't make the trade without assurances from Westbrook that he'd re-sign here.

Well, we know what assurances are worth these days

Different situation.

Dragic comes to mind. He didn't even fool around with other teams.
#HEATLifer

Long Live Kobe Bryant. My idol's idol.
User avatar
KingDavid
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 31,558
And1: 41,142
Joined: Sep 04, 2013
       

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#595 » by KingDavid » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:55 pm

QUIZ wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.

Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.

Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.

Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.

Yep.

Sad realities. Happens in the NFL too. If you're not an elite qb, making it beyond 32 and productive is a miracle.
#HEATLifer

Long Live Kobe Bryant. My idol's idol.
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,450
And1: 18,637
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#596 » by BBallFreak » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:06 pm

Hallstar wrote:
contract wrote:
Hallstar wrote:
Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming

Pat wouldn't make the trade without assurances from Westbrook that he'd re-sign here.

Well, we know what assurances are worth these days

See Harden, James
User avatar
Shewasfly
General Manager
Posts: 8,332
And1: 14,133
Joined: Aug 05, 2014
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#597 » by Shewasfly » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:52 pm

QUIZ wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.

Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.

Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.

Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.


I'm just telling you that you're using premises that do not seem to me to tell the whole story. And you continue to do so. I could get into a debate with you about putting some context to that "lowest efficiency of his entire career" number but I don't really see the point.

I don't see anything in his stats that say he's going to be a bench player other than your age and no other factors comparisons. But if he is, hey he'll be one of many whom Riley has committed to paying huge amounts of money for the next 3+ years. And as its been said a bunch of times already, paying Wade did nothing to stop us from winning now or in the near future. It just ensured we will lose.
Image
Saudades.
User avatar
Shewasfly
General Manager
Posts: 8,332
And1: 14,133
Joined: Aug 05, 2014
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#598 » by Shewasfly » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:53 pm

gom wrote:
QUIZ wrote:
gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)

I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:

http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278

In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.

What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.

Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.

Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.

Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y

Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.

IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.


I definitely agree his productivity would have likely dived if not this year, then next year. I also believe, however, that we're not winning anything soon anyway, so his production is hardly an issue anyhow.

Riley wants to win now. I understand his motivation. He's at the end of his career too, and he also has the same "special motivation" that Lebron has, right?

Now that the Kobe retirement tour is done I think you're seeing a different take by Laker's fans, a feeling of pride. Also their team has a good future (not saying ours doesn't.)


If Pat let Wade leave because he wants to win now then his moves are even dumber than I initially thought.

I don't think the next few off seasons bode any better than the last 3 poor ones did, but I'm curious to see the excuses he will get.
Image
Saudades.
User avatar
Shewasfly
General Manager
Posts: 8,332
And1: 14,133
Joined: Aug 05, 2014
   

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#599 » by Shewasfly » Wed Jul 20, 2016 4:18 pm

KingDavid wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:
QUIZ wrote:What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.

Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.

Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe

Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.

Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y

Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.

IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.


Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.

Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

How many of them had their Mcl removed in college?


This has zero to do with the argument that was presented which was essentially "age age age age age". Injury history is actually a valid theory. Questions around how Wade's knee will hold up would be the real issue. If it wasn't for that and he still had the same minutes played, I'd be much more sure to say he'll be reasonably efficient for the next 2 season. I think the closest situation in which a star player has played so few minutes is Grant Hill, and he surged for a couple of years (in regards to his own production) after 35.

The rest of your post also doesn't seem to address what was originally being talked about so I skipped it.
Image
Saudades.
User avatar
KingDavid
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 31,558
And1: 41,142
Joined: Sep 04, 2013
       

Re: Dwyane Wade Appreciation Thread 

Post#600 » by KingDavid » Wed Jul 20, 2016 5:16 pm

Hallstar wrote:
QUIZ wrote:
Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.

Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.

Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.

Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.

The lowest per since his rookie season was 3rd among SGs though :lol:

Riley owes us a superstar if Wade is who would "hold us back"

I don't agree with losing Wade.

But if you want to make sense of it for the sake of discussion; we lost Deng and JJ. We're not picking up a player of Luol's caliber off the waiver wire. Having Wade seemingly without Bosh for another half season would likely mean we make the playoffs just to be first round fodder. So now we're not bad enough to be in the lottery AND we're not good enough to contend. Rinse, repeat for either 2/50 or 3/60.
#HEATLifer

Long Live Kobe Bryant. My idol's idol.

Return to Miami Heat