HeatGuyInChicago wrote:I blame Riley and Wade. They both have regret.
Pat is smoking a Cuban cigar, drinking Champagne, and laughing maniacally as "Bitch better have my money" plays on a loop.
Moderators: KingDavid, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ, heat4life
HeatGuyInChicago wrote:I blame Riley and Wade. They both have regret.
gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)
I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:
http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278
In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.
QUIZ wrote:gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)
I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:
http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278
In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.
What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.
Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.
Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.
Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y
Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.
IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.

contract wrote:gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)
I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:
http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278
In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.
Pat just ran Wade off so he'd have money to go whale hunting. I'm expecting whales.

Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.
Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

QUIZ wrote:Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.
Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.
Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.
Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.
Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.
QUIZ wrote:gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)
I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:
http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278
In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.
What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.
Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.
Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.
Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y
Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.
IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.

Hallstar wrote:contract wrote:gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)
I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:
http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278
In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.
Pat just ran Wade off so he'd have money to go whale hunting. I'm expecting whales.
Thank you.
If we don't get Westbrook, that's the 4th year of off season failure
contract wrote:Hallstar wrote:contract wrote:Pat just ran Wade off so he'd have money to go whale hunting. I'm expecting whales.
Thank you.
If we don't get Westbrook, that's the 4th year of off season failure
Signing Westbrook would mean having to flip Dragic for another star player. Westbrook and Whiteside alone aren't winning anything.
Hallstar wrote:contract wrote:Hallstar wrote:Thank you.
If we don't get Westbrook, that's the 4th year of off season failure
Signing Westbrook would mean having to flip Dragic for another star player. Westbrook and Whiteside alone aren't winning anything.
Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming
contract wrote:Hallstar wrote:contract wrote:Signing Westbrook would mean having to flip Dragic for another star player. Westbrook and Whiteside alone aren't winning anything.
Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming
Pat wouldn't make the trade without assurances from Westbrook that he'd re-sign here.

Shewasfly wrote:QUIZ wrote:gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)
I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:
http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278
In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.
What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.
Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.
Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.
Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y
Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.
IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.
Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.

Hallstar wrote:contract wrote:Hallstar wrote:
Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming
Pat wouldn't make the trade without assurances from Westbrook that he'd re-sign here.
Well, we know what assurances are worth these days

QUIZ wrote:Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.
Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.
Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.
Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.
Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.

Hallstar wrote:contract wrote:Hallstar wrote:
Oh I know, but it's better than the Dragic, Winslow, picks for Westbrook rental I see coming
Pat wouldn't make the trade without assurances from Westbrook that he'd re-sign here.
Well, we know what assurances are worth these days
QUIZ wrote:Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.
Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.
Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.
Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.
Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.

gom wrote:QUIZ wrote:gom wrote:3/60 would have closed the deal. We could have matched what the Bulls offered too if we would have waived McRoberts and then stretched him (assuming no team picked him up.)
I agree pretty much with everything Albert has to say here:
http://heathoops.com/2016/07/pat-riley-addresses-the-miami-heat-summer/#more-29278
In my opinion, however, our faith is misplaced in entertaining the 2017 Summer free agency market. I prefer to build the team internally. My fear is that we will dump assets for rentals (like one year of Westbrook) and try to win now, rather than have the patience to collect ourselves and work from a position of strength.
What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.
Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.
Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.
Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y
Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.
IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.
I definitely agree his productivity would have likely dived if not this year, then next year. I also believe, however, that we're not winning anything soon anyway, so his production is hardly an issue anyhow.
Riley wants to win now. I understand his motivation. He's at the end of his career too, and he also has the same "special motivation" that Lebron has, right?
Now that the Kobe retirement tour is done I think you're seeing a different take by Laker's fans, a feeling of pride. Also their team has a good future (not saying ours doesn't.)

KingDavid wrote:Shewasfly wrote:QUIZ wrote:What do you think about 2 guards historically dropping off after the age of 34? Both Kobe and MJ (For different reasons) did not have good seasons after the age of 34. In fact they were both awful from there on out.
Here is a list of guards sorted by WS ages 35+: http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
The top 20 are almost entirely PG's other than Ray who was an excellent 3pt shooter. The track record for athletic non shooting 2 guards post 35 is not good.
Post 36? http://bkref.com/tiny/scPFe
Even worse, Ray and Manu while effective yet essentially turned into bench players playing 22 and 25mpg respectively.
Post 37? http://bkref.com/tiny/JeL6y
Again PG's and bench players. You're a sensible guy gom, $60mill is a lot to commit when the next 3 seasons are likely to play out that way. Personally I think Wade will be decent this season 17 4 and 3 on 50TS% but after this season we'll see a major drop off.
IDK man, whether he stayed or left we still wouldn't have been very good.
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.
Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.
How many of them had their Mcl removed in college?


Hallstar wrote:QUIZ wrote:Shewasfly wrote:
Lots of information on that website. I see that by 35, Kobe had played over 45,000 minutes. Next year, Wade will have played barely over 30,000. All the other guys on the lists that you shared have considerably lower minutes played as well. I'm not saying this is definitely why the drop offs happen, but I find it interesting that with all the analytics people want to use these days for their own agendas, they have issues actually being analytical.
Also MJ shouldn't be in the conversation since he was 38 when he played again, but either way he was classified as SF when he came back so he wouldn't have made it to your list no matter what.
Doesn't change the fact that you can't really come up with any shooting guards having good seasons post 35. The best example would be Ray Allen and he was a 3pt specialist averaging 16ppg. Last season Wade had the lowest efficiency of his entire career and the lowest PER since his rookie season.
Now you could just look at this and say that it's all just my agenda talking... or you could acknowledge that the decline started in 2012 and has continued without stopping since. Now could Wade defy the odds like Tom Brady and continue performing at a high level? Yeah, but history and his own stats tell us that by the 2017 season he'll be a bench player playing around 26mpg.
Which is where he was heading if he had stayed here anyway. Spo probably would've got him down to 29mpg this season.
The lowest per since his rookie season was 3rd among SGs though![]()
Riley owes us a superstar if Wade is who would "hold us back"