Vertical Limit wrote:I feel a blockbuster deal is coming, and it’s going to involve Lebron being moved. And it may end up with Giannis moving to LA.
Not sure the Lakers really care for Wiggins now to be honest. I thought it made sense if they were keeping Lebron… but it looks like there is a possibility that lebron will waive his NTC for a trade that moves him out..
The lakers are trying to kickstart their new era right now with Luka.
Maybe we can get in on it.. i assume the lakers will need a third team involved and if we can get assets in return lets do it..
LeBron has a no-trade clause, and he isn't OKing a deal to Milwaukee.
FWIW, this is from ESPN:
ESPN's Bobby Marks reported on "Get Up" this morning that there is not a robust trade market for the 40-year-old superstar. "I talked to numerous teams yesterday and asked that same question. 'Would you give up basically the farm?' You'd have to give up four or five players to go get LeBron James for one year, and the unanimous answer was no, they wouldn't."
I can only see Cleveland (Garland and Strus), San Antonio (Vassell, Barnes, and Johnson), Minnesota (Gobert, DVV, and Conley), and the Knicks (for Towns) as viable options here. Philadelphia, Golden St and Miami have an outside shot at LeBron, but someone would have to eat Paul George's deal and LeBron would have to trust Embiid would be healthy. Golden St would have to either trade Butler or the Lakers would have to take Kuminga in a S&T along with D Green. Miami basically only has Wiggins and garbage contracts to offer.
And I imagine LeBron would want Bronny to go with him, which would cost a team a draft pick.