Garbs_7 wrote:Who are the 7 people who want Mark Jackson to coach this team? I just want to talk...
Mostly Raptor trolls
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

Garbs_7 wrote:Who are the 7 people who want Mark Jackson to coach this team? I just want to talk...

RedMosquito76 wrote:Over the years, I have enjoyed lurking on this board because you guys are great at bringing forward any snippet of news about my beloved Bucks. On that same note, when there's a decision looming and nothing is leaking, I've noticed the board tends to freak out a bit.
As for me, I can agree that the delay is a bit unsettling but I like to think that with nothing leaking there's no pressure from anyone other than fans for them to be in a hurry. Let the market develop, talk to the guys you're at all interested in, and then when you are confident you have your guy you make your hire. Nobody's hired anybody yet so no one is off the board and there's no need to rush. I can't believe I'm going to say this, but "trust the process"
RiotPunch wrote:jimmybones wrote:RiotPunch wrote:How about, "Where were you when Bud was self-destructing/not adjusting/not using timeouts?"
What exactly are you proposing an assistant can or should do there?
Being in their coaches ear, keeping him on track with game management. Speaking up in timeouts if they notice something isn't working. Not sitting back and doing nothing. I'm all for Lee getting his shot, but a great assistant steps in to try to stop the bleeding, imo.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
JayMKE wrote:they should lie and just say Nurse interviewed, I can't take Horst being so stupid that he actually thinks Monty Williams, Mark Jackson, and Doc Rivers would be good hires. Not a basketball mind, go back to FedEx loser.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?

Matches Malone wrote:Vogel is solid but he doesn't really get me excited. I go back and forth on wanting a veteran coach who's got experience or a young assistant that might be more of an offensive tactician and is ready to grind every night. I'm just glad we have the most coachable superstar.
paulpressey25 wrote:Matches Malone wrote:Vogel is solid but he doesn't really get me excited. I go back and forth on wanting a veteran coach who's got experience or a young assistant that might be more of an offensive tactician and is ready to grind every night. I'm just glad we have the most coachable superstar.
Can’t get excited at all about Vogel. He’s been fired at three different places, in three very different settings (Indiana, Orlando, LA).
If we’re going to upgrade from Bud, let’s upgrade.
paulpressey25 wrote:Matches Malone wrote:Vogel is solid but he doesn't really get me excited. I go back and forth on wanting a veteran coach who's got experience or a young assistant that might be more of an offensive tactician and is ready to grind every night. I'm just glad we have the most coachable superstar.
Can’t get excited at all about Vogel. He’s been fired at three different places, in three very different settings (Indiana, Orlando, LA).
If we’re going to upgrade from Bud, let’s upgrade.

Prez wrote:I’d be okay with Vogel provided they bring in a talented/creative assistant for the offense. Not exactly sure who that’d be though.
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
RiotPunch wrote:Prez wrote:I’d be okay with Vogel provided they bring in a talented/creative assistant for the offense. Not exactly sure who that’d be though.
I am really liking the idea of Borrego as a lead assistant. Joining with Vogel or whoever in Milwaukee seems like a really smart play for him to get back to the head coaching ranks. That Charlotte offense was balanced and exploited mismatches.

paulpressey25 wrote:We've had these discussions in years past. You aren't able to mix and match head coaches with assistants that you like. Remember, the head coach wants his own people/own staff. And guys interviewing for a job, are interviewing the THE job, not thinking or wanting the guy who is ultimately hired to bring them on staff.
You take Vogel (or any of these guys) based on who they are and what they've done. That's what you're going to get.
paulpressey25 wrote:We've had these discussions in years past. You aren't able to mix and match head coaches with assistants that you like. Remember, the head coach wants his own people/own staff. And guys interviewing for a job, are interviewing the THE job, not thinking or wanting the guy who is ultimately hired to bring them on staff.
You take Vogel (or any of these guys) based on who they are and what they've done. That's what you're going to get.
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis

RiotPunch wrote:Mostly true. Lakers did force Kidd on Vogel in LA, though.
On the flip side, Atkinson backed out of the Charlotte gig over not having full freedom hiring his staff.
paulpressey25 wrote:RiotPunch wrote:Mostly true. Lakers did force Kidd on Vogel in LA, though.
On the flip side, Atkinson backed out of the Charlotte gig over not having full freedom hiring his staff.
True...and that didn't work out in LA, just like it didn't work forcing Lawrence Frank on Kidd (or vice versa).
If you guys all like Vogel, that's great. I'd just like a coach who either is a dynamic personality or an innovator. Don't feel like I get either with Vogel.
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis