MickeyDavis wrote:Woelfel is still alive? Is Larry Harris still feeding him stuff to gauge fan interest?
He doesn't know anything anymore.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
MickeyDavis wrote:Woelfel is still alive? Is Larry Harris still feeding him stuff to gauge fan interest?
RiotPunch wrote:
MKE: Kuzma
WAS: Adams, Connaughton, Jeff Green, picks via MKE/HOU
HOU: Lopez, Beauchamp
TGW wrote:Would you guys do Chet Holgren and two FRPs for Giannis?
Bernman wrote:RiotPunch wrote:Daver wrote:
Anyway wecan keep midds n atill get this guy
MKE: Kuzma
WAS: Adams, Connaughton, Jeff Green, picks via MKE/HOU
HOU: Lopez, Beauchamp
I thought of a similar move, but no picks via us, & we need a big back who's a viable starter but costs little. That's where it gets tricky.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
KnicksGod wrote:Middleton probably the most underrated player in NBA History
Swapping Middleton for Kuzma would allow the Bucks to move below the second tax apron, Robbins and Aldridge outline, saving them money and generating more roster flexibility while also allowing them to avoid having their 2032 first-round pick become “frozen” at season’s end.
However, Kuzma is in the midst of the worst season of his career and The Athletic’s duo says the Wizards would be seeking draft capital in order to acquire Middleton, who has battled injuries in recent years.
A straight-up swap of the two players also wouldn’t quite be possible due to the difference in their salaries, so for matching purposes, the Wizards would have to send out a second player along with Kuzma ($23.5MM cap hit; $26.5MM apron hit) in order to take back Middleton ($31.7MM cap hit; $34MM apron hit).
LUKE23 wrote:Kuzma is a longer contract than Midds and is still a worse player, even with Midds' issues. I wouldn't do the deal at all, but if it was done there needs to be an asset coming back to the Bucks, not vice versa.
LUKE23 wrote:Kuzma is a longer contract than Midds and is still a worse player, even with Midds' issues. I wouldn't do the deal at all, but if it was done there needs to be an asset coming back to the Bucks, not vice versa.